| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Bufe, Alexander, et al.
(författare)
-
Costs of bleeds relating to acute coronary syndrome therapies.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Economics. - : Informa Healthcare. - 1369-6998 .- 1941-837X. ; 13:2, s. 236-240
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To estimate the costs to manage selected types of bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with antithrombotics, including antiplatelet, and fibrinolytic therapies: decrease in haemoglobin >3 g/dL, puncture site, and bleeding requiring transfusion of blood products.Methods: Retrospective chart reviews of ACS patients experiencing decrease in Hb, puncture site, or bleeding requiring transfusion were conducted in hospitals in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden to determine the total length of stay (LOS), stay post-bleeding, procedures to identify the extent of bleeding, number and types of transfusion products, patient demographics, reason for hospital admission and disposition upon discharge. Country-specific costs were applied to estimate the average cost per patient by type of bleeding event.Results: Records of 158 ACS patients with the bleeding complications were examined (26.9% decrease in Hb, 35.5% puncture site, and 37.8% transfusion). The average LOS was 10.6 days for decreasing Hb, 7.7 days for puncture site bleeding, and 11.3 days for patients receiving transfusions due to these bleeding events. The average costs per patient ranged between €3,986 and €10,252. The LOS ranged widely both within and across countries.Limitations: The study has a small sample size and costs are confounded by co-morbidities.Conclusions: The estimated costs for decreasing Hb, puncture site bleeding and bleeding resulting in transfusions provide a tool for researchers to conduct economic analyses of bleeding events associated with therapies for ACS.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Jendle, Johan, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Willingness-to-pay for benefits associated with basal insulin treatment of type 2 diabetes
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Economics. - Oxfordshire, United Kingdom : Taylor & Francis. - 1369-6998 .- 1941-837X. ; 15:2, s. 261-263
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Data from a 20-week trial comparing insulin detemir and neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes were analyzed using willingness-to-pay (WTP) data, a proxy for patient preference. The advantages of insulin detemir relative to NPH insulin with respect to a lower hypoglycemia rate and less weight gain were associated with a value of €27.87 per month.
|
|
| 8. |
- Jendle, Johan, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Willingness to pay for diabetes drug therapy in type 2 diabetes patients : based on LEAD clinical programme results
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Economics. - Oxfordshire, United Kingdom : Taylor & Francis. - 1369-6998 .- 1941-837X. ; 15:Suppl 2, s. 1-5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the preferences of people with diabetes for liraglutide vs other glucose lowering drugs, based on outcomes of clinical trials.Methods: Willingness to pay (WTP) for diabetes drug treatment was assessed by combining results from a recent WTP study with analysis of results from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) programme. The LEAD programme included six randomised clinical trials with 3967 participants analysing efficacy and safety of liraglutide 1.2 mg (LEAD 1-6 trials), rosiglitazone (LEAD 1 trial), glimepiride (LEAD 2-3 trials), insulin glargine (LEAD 5 trial), and exenatide (LEAD 6 trial). The WTP survey used discrete choice experimental (DCE) methodology to evaluate the convenience and clinical effects of glucose lowering treatments.Results: People with type 2 diabetes were prepared to pay an extra €2.64/day for liraglutide compared with rosiglitazone, an extra €1.94/day compared with glimepiride, an extra €3.36/day compared with insulin glargine, and an extra €0.81/day compared with exenatide. Weight loss was the largest component of WTP for liraglutide compared with rosiglitazone, glimepiride, and insulin glargine. Differences in the administration of the two drugs was the largest component of WTP for liraglutide (once daily anytime) compared with exenatide (twice daily with meals). A limitation of the study was that it was based on six clinical trials where liraglutide was the test drug, but each trial had a different comparator, therefore the clinical effects of liraglutide were much better documented than the comparators.Conclusions: WTP analyses of the clinical results from the LEAD programme suggested that participants with type 2 diabetes were willing to pay appreciably more for liraglutide than other glucose lowering treatments. This was driven by the relative advantage of weight loss compared with rosiglitazone, glimepiride, and insulin glargine, and administration frequency compared with exenatide.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Ohsfeldt, Robert L., et al.
(författare)
-
Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 20 mg for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality : a Swedish economic evaluation of the Jupiter trial
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Economics. - : Informa Healthcare. - 1369-6998 .- 1941-837X. ; 15:1, s. 125-133
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE:This study estimated the long-term health outcomes, healthcare costs, and cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 20 mg therapy in primary prevention of major cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a Swedish population.METHODS:Based on data from the JUPITER trial, long-term CVD outcomes with rosuvastatin vs no active treatment were estimated for patients with an elevated baseline CVD risk (Framingham CVD score >20%, sub-population of JUPITER population) and for a population similar to the total JUPITER population. Using a decision-analytic model, trial CVD event rates were combined with epidemiological and cost data specific for Sweden. First and subsequent CVD events and death were estimated over a lifetime perspective. The observed relative risk reduction was extrapolated beyond the trial duration. Incremental effectiveness was measured as life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained.RESULTS:Treating 100,000 patients with rosuvastatin 20 mg was estimated to avoid 14,692 CVD events over the lifetime (8021 non-fatal MIs, 3228 non-fatal strokes, and 4924 CVD deaths) compared to placebo. This translated into an estimated gain of 42,122 QALYs and 36,865 total life years (LYG). Rosuvastatin was both more effective and less costly over a lifetime perspective, and rosuvastatin is subsequently a dominant alternative compared to no treatment in the assessed population. Using the overall JUPITER population, rosuvastatin was dominant for the lifetime horizon. In the sensitivity analysis, rosuvastatin was the dominant treatment strategy over a 20-year time horizon, and cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per QALY) of SEK 1783 over a 10-year time horizon.LIMITATIONS:Some model inputs were derived from literature or other data sources, but uncertainty was controlled by sensitivity analyses.CONCLUSIONS:Results indicate that rosuvastatin 20 mg treatment is a cost-effective option vs no-treatment in patients with Framingham CVD risk >20% in Sweden and might even be cost saving if taking a long-term perspective.
|
|
