| 1. |
- Blaser, Annika Reintam, et al.
(författare)
-
Abdominal compliance : A bench-to-bedside review
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. - 2163-0755 .- 2163-0763. ; 78:5, s. 1044-1053
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Abdominal compliance (AC) is an important determinant and predictor of available workspace during laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, critically ill patients with a reduced AC are at an increased risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome, both of which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite this, AC is a concept that has been neglected in the past. AC is defined as a measure of the ease of abdominal expansion, expressed as a change in intra-abdominal volume (IAV) per change in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): AC = Delta IAV/Delta IAP AC is a dynamic variable dependent on baseline IAV and IAP as well as abdominal reshaping and stretching capacity. Whereas AC itself can only rarely be measured, it always needs to be considered an important component of IAP. Patients with decreased AC are prone to fulminant development of abdominal compartment syndrome when concomitant risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension are present. This review aims to clarify the pressure-volume relationship within the abdominal cavity. It highlights how different conditions and pathologies can affect AC and which management strategies could be applied to avoid serious consequences of decreased AC. We have pooled all available human data to calculate AC values in patients acutely and chronically exposed to intra-abdominal hypertension and demonstrated an exponential abdominal pressure-volume relationship. Most importantly, patients with high level of IAP have a reduced AC. In these patients, only small reduction in IAV can significantly increase AC and reduce IAPs. A greater knowledge on AC may help in selecting a better surgical approach and in reducing complications related to intra-abdominal hypertension.
|
|
| 2. |
- Manser, S. S, et al.
(författare)
-
Do screening and a randomized brief intervention at a Level 1 trauma center impact acute stress reactions to prevent later development of posttraumatic stress disorder?
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. - Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 2163-0755 .- 2163-0763. ; 85:3, s. 466-475
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% to 40% of trauma survivors experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma reports that early screening and referral has the potential to improve outcomes and that further study of screening and intervention for PTSD would be beneficial. This prospective randomized study screened hospitalized patients for traumatic stress reactions and assessed the effect of a brief intervention in reducing later development of PTSD.METHODS: The Primary Care PTSD (PC-PTSD) screen was administered to admitted patients. Patients with symptoms were randomized to an intervention or control group. The brief intervention focused on symptom education and normalization, coping strategies, and utilizing supports. The control group received a 3-minute educational brochure review. Both groups completed in-hospital interviews, then 45- and 90-day telephone interviews. Follow-up collected the PTSD checklist-civilian (PCL-C) assessment and qualitative data on treatment-seeking barriers.RESULTS: The PC-PTSD screen was successful in predicting later PTSD symptoms at both 45 days ( = 0.43, p < 0.001) and 90 days ( = 0.37, p < 0.001) even after accounting for depression. Correlations of the intervention with the PCL-C scores and factor score estimates did not reach statistical significance at either time point (p = 0.827; p = 0.838), indicating that the brief intervention did not decrease PTSD symptoms over time. Of those at or above the PCL-C cutoff at follow-ups, a minority had sought treatment for their symptoms (43.2%). Primary barriers included focusing on their injury or ongoing rehabilitation, financial concerns, or location of residence.CONCLUSION: The PC-PTSD screen identified patients who later assess positive for PTSD using the PCL-C. The brief intervention did not reduce 45- and 90-day PTSD development. Follow-up interviews revealed lack of treatment infrastructure in the community. It will be important for trauma centers to align with community resources to address the treatment needs of at-risk patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Manzano-Nunez, Ramiro, et al.
(författare)
-
A meta-analysis of the incidence of complications associated with groin access after the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients.
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 2163-0755 .- 2163-0763. ; 85:3, s. 626-634
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Serious complications related to groin access have been reported with the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of complications related to groin access from the use of REBOA in adult trauma patients.METHODS: We identified articles in MEDLINE and EMBASE. We reviewed all studies that involved adult trauma patients that underwent the placement of a REBOA and included only those that reported the incidence of complications related to groin access. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed RESULTS: We 13 studies with a total of 424 patients. REBOA was inserted most commonly by trauma surgeons or emergency room physicians. Information regarding puncture technique was reported in 12 studies and was available for a total of 414 patients. Percutaneous access and surgical cutdown were performed in 304 (73.4%) and 110 (26.5%) patients respectively. Overall, complications related to groin access occurred in 5.6% of patients (n=24/424). Lower limb amputation was required in 2.1% of patients (9/424), of which three cases (3/424 [0.7%]) were directly related to the vascular puncture from the REBOA insertion. A meta-analysis which used the logit transformation showed a 5% (95% CI 3%-9%) incidence of complications without significant heterogeneity (LR test: χ2 = 0.73, p=0.2, Tau-square=0.2). In a second meta-analysis, we used the Freeman-Turkey double arcsine transformation and found an incidence of complications of 4% (95% CI 2%-7%) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 16.3%).CONCLUSION: We found that the incidence of complications related to groin access was of four to five percent based on a meta-analysis of 13 studies published worldwide. Currently, there are no benchmarks or quality measures as a reference to compare, and thus, further work is required to identify these benchmarks and improve the practice of REBOA in trauma surgery.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Level III.
|
|
| 4. |
- Reva, Viktor A., et al.
(författare)
-
Field and en route resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta : A feasible military reality?
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. - Philadelphia, PA, United States : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 2163-0755 .- 2163-0763. ; 83:1, s. S170-S176
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Severe non-compressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) remains a leading cause of potentially preventable death in modern military conflicts. Resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has demonstrated potential as an effective adjunct to the treatment of NCTH in the civilian early hospital and even pre-hospital settings - but the application of this technology for military pre-hospital use has not been well described. We aimed to assess the feasibility of both field and en route pre-hospital REBOA in the military exercise setting simulating a modern armed conflict.METHODS: Two adult male Sus Scrofa underwent simulated junctional combat injury in the context of a planned military training exercise. Both underwent zone I REBOA in conjunction with standard tactical combat casualty care (TCCC) interventions - one during point of injury care and the other during en route flight care. Animals were sequentially evacuated to two separate Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs) by rotary wing platform where the balloon position was confirmed by chest X-Ray. Animals then underwent different damage control thoracic and abdominal procedures before euthanasia.RESULTS: The first swine underwent immediate successful REBOA at the point of injury 7:30 minutes after the injury. It required 6 minutes total from initiation of procedure to effective aortic occlusion. Total occlusion time was 60 minutes. In the second animal, the REBOA placement procedure was initiated immediately after take-off (17:40 minutes after the injury). Although the movements and vibration of flight were not significant impediments, we only succeeded to put a 6-Fr sheath into a femoral artery during the 14 minutes flight due to lighting and visualization challenges. After the sheath had been upsized in the FST, the REBOA catheter was primarily placed in zone I followed by its replacement to zone III. Both animals survived to study completion and the termination of training. No complications were observed in either animal.CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the potential feasibility of REBOA for use during tactical field and en route (flight) care of combat casualties. Further study is needed to determine the optimal training and utilization protocols required to facilitate the effective incorporation of REBOA into military pre-hospital care capabilities.
|
|
| 5. |
- Wahlgren, Carl-Magnus, et al.
(författare)
-
Management and outcome of pediatric vascular injuries
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. - 2163-0755 .- 2163-0763. ; 79:4, s. 563-567
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND Vascular injuries in children are relatively uncommon. The objective of this population-based study was to investigate the epidemiology, management, and early outcomes of pediatric vascular injuries. METHODS A nationwide survey of prospectively collected data on pediatric vascular injuries in children 15 years or younger between 1987 and 2013 was conducted. Data were retrieved from the National Vascular Surgery registry (Swedvasc) and cross-matched with the National Population Register for mortality data. Demographics, operative techniques, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS There were 222 children (boys, n = 148; girls, n = 74) included in this study, with a mean (SD) age of 9.6 (4.1) years (range, 0.5-15 years; <6 years, 18 %; 6-10 years, 39%; >10 years, 42%). Blunt trauma mechanism (n = 146, 66%) was dominant, followed by penetrating (n = 51, 23%) and iatrogenic trauma (n = 21, 9%). Anatomic locations of vascular injuries were primarily upper extremities (n = 134, 60%) and lower extremities (n = 65, 29%), followed by the abdomen (n = 16, 7.2%). Upper extremity injuries were most common in the age group of 10 years or younger (78%, 100 of 128), and lower extremity injuries were most common in the age group of 11 years to 15 years (48%, 45 of 94). Major repair techniques included interposition graft (n = 54, 24%), patch (n = 43, 19%), primary repair (lateral suture/direct anastomosis) (n = 27, 12%), bypass (n = 21, 9.5%), and endovascular techniques (n = 8, 3.7%). Exploration or release of artery was performed in 51 cases (23%). Vein (n = 110) was the dominant graft material, and synthetic grafts (polytetrafluoroethylene/dacron) were only used in four open cases. The most common postoperative complication was arterial occlusion/thrombosis (n = 12). At 30-day follow-up, there was one above-knee and two below-knee amputations as well as one death. No more deaths at 1-year follow-up did occur. CONCLUSION This nationwide population-based study shows that traumatic vascular injuries in children are associated with high limb salvage rates and low mortality. Blunt trauma mechanism is dominant, and injuries are primarily located to the upper and lower extremities. The preferred repair techniques are venous patch angioplasty and interposition graft, and the frequency of endovascular repair is still low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiologic study, level III.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Genét, Gustav Folmer, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of propranolol and clonidine on brain edema, blood-brain barrier permeability, and endothelial glycocalyx disruption after fluid percussion brain injury in the rat
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. - 2163-0755. ; 84:1, s. 89-96
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury causes a disruption of the vascular endothelial glycocalyx layer that is associated with an overactivation of the sympathoadrenal system. We hypothesized that early and unselective beta-blockade with propranolol alone or in combination with the alfa2-agonist clonidine would decrease brain edema, blood-brain barrier permeability, and glycocalyx disruption at 24 hours after trauma. METHODS We subjected 53 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats to lateral fluid percussion brain injury and randomized infusion with propranolol (n = 16), propranolol + clonidine (n = 16), vehicle (n = 16), or sham (n = 5) for 24 hours. Primary outcome was brain water content at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were blood-brain barrier permeability and plasma levels of syndecan-1 (glycocalyx disruption), cell damage (histone-complexed DNA fragments), epinephrine, norepinephrine, and animal motor function. RESULTS We found no difference in brain water content (mean ± SD) between propranolol (80.8 ± 0.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 80.7-81.0) and vehicle (81.1 ± 0.6%; 95% CI, 80.8-81.4) (p = 0.668) or between propranolol/clonidine (80.8 ± 0.3%; 95% CI, 80.7-81.0) and vehicle (p = 0.555). We found no effect of propranolol and propranolol/clonidine on blood-brain barrier permeability and animal motor scores. Unexpectedly, propranolol and propranolol/clonidine caused an increase in epinephrine and syndecan-1 levels. CONCLUSION This study does not provide any support for unselective beta-blockade with propranolol or the combination of propranolol and the alfa2-agonist clonidine on brain water content. The novel finding of an increase in plasma concentrations of epinephrine and syndecan-1 after propranolol treatment in traumatic brain injury is of unclear significance and should be investigated further.
|
|
