| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Minchenia, Alena
(författare)
-
Behind the “Failed Revolution” : Becoming Patriots, or the Work of Shame in Belarusian Protests
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society. - 2364-5334. ; 3:1, s. 21-51
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article looks at the politics of shame in relation to the suppressed protests of December 2010 that challenged the re-election of Aliaksandr Lukashenka as president of Belarus (1994–present). My empirical data consist of independent media publications, blog posts, and interviews that speak of “shame” as an emotional response to the protest, its aftermath, and its general context. The article investigates what lines of social differentiation are animated in the circulation of shame discourse, how ashamed subjects are constructed and positioned in this process, and what shame does in relation to protest and its community. Theoretically it engages with discussions on the ambivalence of shame in constructing national narratives and in social movement struggles. The findings suggest that shame, employed as a marker of a patriot of a “non-existent Belarusian nation” and “failed democracy,” creates multiple divisions along the lines of class, civic engagement, and political views. This in turn curtails social mobilization, and ultimately contributes to making social change unimaginable in the present.
|
|
| 3. |
- Rudling, Per A.
(författare)
-
Yushchenko's Fascist : The Bandera Cult in Ukraine and Canada
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society. - 2364-5334. ; 3:2, s. 129-178
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Viktor Yushchenko’s 2010 designation of Stepan Bandera, the war‐time leader of the most radical and violent branch of the Ukrainian far right, as a national hero constituted, in many ways, the climax of the third post‐Soviet Ukrainian president’s instrumentalization of history. Yushchenko’s political use of history triggered sharply polarized, and often emotional discussions of Bandera’s role in history, not only in Ukraine, but also in Canada, the United States, Poland, and Israel. This article analyzes the “Bandera debate” against the backdrop of the significant advances in the historiography of war‐time Ukrainian nationalism since the openings of archives in recent decades.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
