| 1. |
- Abreu-Mendes, Pedro, et al.
(författare)
-
Myofascial Pelvic Pain : Best Orientation and Clinical Practice. Position of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel on Chronic Pelvic Pain
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Urology Focus. - : Elsevier. - 2405-4569. ; 9:1, s. 172-177
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- CONTEXT: Despite the high prevalence of a myofascial pain component in chronic pelvic pain (CPP) syndromes, awareness and management of this component are lacking among health care providers.OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current state of the art for the management of myofascial pain in chronic primary pelvic pain syndromes (CPPPS) according to scientific research and input from experts from the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on CPP.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A narrative review was undertaken using three sources: (1) information in the EAU guidelines on CPP; (2) information retrieved from the literature on research published in the past 3 yr on myofascial pelvic pain; and (3) expert opinion from panel members.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Studies confirm a high prevalence of a myofascial pain component in CPPPS. Examination of the pelvic floor muscles should follow published recommendations to standardize findings and disseminate the procedure. Treatment of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction and pain in the context of CPP was found to contribute to CPP control and is feasible via different physiotherapy techniques. A multidisciplinary approach is the most effective.CONCLUSIONS: Despite its high prevalence, the myofascial component of CPP has been underevaluated and undertreated to date. Myofascial pain must be assessed in all patients with CPPPS. Treatment of the myofascial pain component is relevant for global treatment success. Further studies are imperative to reinforce and better define the role of each physiotherapy technique in CPPPS.PATIENT SUMMARY: Pain and inflammation of the body's muscle and soft tissues (myofascial pain) frequently occurs in pelvic pain syndromes. Its presence must be evaluated to optimize management for each patient. If diagnosed, myofascial pain should be treated.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Krzyzanowska, Agnieszka, et al.
(författare)
-
Development, Validation, and Clinical Utility of a Six-gene Signature to Predict Aggressive Prostate Cancer
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Urology Focus. - 2405-4569. ; 9:6, s. 983-991
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Molecular signatures in prostate cancer (PCa) tissue can provide useful prognostic information to improve the understanding of a patient's risk of harbouring aggressive disease. Objective: To develop and validate a gene signature that adds independent prognostic information to clinical parameters for better treatment decisions and patient management. Design, setting, and participants: Expression of 14 genes was evaluated in radical prostatectomy (RP) tissue from an Irish cohort of PCa patients (n = 426). A six-gene molecular risk score (MRS) was identified with strong prognostic performance to predict adverse pathology (AP) at RP or biochemical recurrence (BCR). The MRS was combined with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, to create a molecular and clinical risk score (MCRS), and validated in a Swedish cohort (n = 203). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary AP outcome was assessed by the likelihood ratio statistics and area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) from logistic regression models. The secondary time to BCR outcome was assessed by likelihood ratio statistics and C-indexes from Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results and limitations: The six-gene signature was significantly (p < 0.0001) prognostic and added significant prognostic value to clinicopathological features for AP and BCR outcomes. For both outcomes, both the MRS and the MCRS increased the AUC/C-index when added to European Association of Urology (EAU) and CAPRA scores. Limitations include the retrospective nature of this study. Conclusions: The six-gene signature has strong performance for the prediction of AP and BCR in an independent clinical validation study. MCRS improves prognostic evaluation and can optimise patient management after RP. Patient summary: We found that the expression panel of six genes can help predict whether a patient is likely to have a disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy surgery.
|
|
| 5. |
- Liedberg, Fredrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Quinolone Prophylaxis in Conjunction with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Instillations for Bladder Cancer : Time To Reconsider the Evidence and Open the Quinolone Box?
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Urology Focus. - 2405-4569.
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations represent a cornerstone in the treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Instillation schedule and dose modifications have been evaluated in efforts to reduce the incidence of adverse events (AEs), but none so far has the same treatment efficacy as the full-dose recommended schedule. It has been shown that prophylactic quinolone use in conjunction with BCG instillations reduces AE incidence and improves timely completion of instillation regimens and patient survival. However, the European Medicines Agency imposed restrictions on the use of quinolones in 2019 because of side effects. Nevertheless, rational use of quinolone prophylaxis could be considered for selected individuals treated with BCG without risk factors for quinolone-associated side effects in conjunction with patient information about side-effect symptoms. Patient summary: Bladder instillations of BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin) are used in the treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Antibiotics from the quinolone class can reduce the adverse effects of BCG and help patients in completing the treatment course; however, these antibiotics have their own side effects. Our mini review suggests that the antibiotics could be used in selective cases if patients are given adequate information on these side effects and their symptoms.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Perera, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Urology Focus. - : Elsevier BV. - 2405-4569. ; 9:4, s. 662-668
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as the preferred treatment for men with low-risk disease. In order to optimize risk stratification and exclude undiagnosed higher-grade disease, most AS protocols recommend a confirmatory biopsy.Objective: We aimed to compare outcomes among men with grade group (GG) 2/3 prostate cancer on initial biopsy with those among men whose disease was initially GG1 but was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy.Design, setting, and participants: We reviewed patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in two cohorts: "immediate RP group,"with GG2/3 cancer on diagnostic biopsy, and "AS group,"with GG1 cancer on initial biopsy that was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Probabilities of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and salvage therapy were determined using multivariable Cox regression models with risk adjustment. Risks of adverse pathology at RP were also compared using logistic regression.Results and limitations: The immediate RP group comprised 4009 patients and the AS group comprised 321 patients. The AS group had lower adjusted rates of adverse pathology (27% vs 35%, p = 0.003). BCR rates were lower in the AS group, although this did not reach conventional significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06, p = 0.10) compared with the immediate RP group. Risk-adjusted 1- and 5yr BCR rates were 4.6% (95% CI 3.0-6.5%) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.9-14%), respectively, for the AS group compared with 6.3% (95% CI 5.6-7.0%) and 20% (95% CI 19-22%), respectively, in the immediate RP group. A nonsignificant association was observed for salvage treatment-free survival favoring the AS group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.06, p = 0.087).Conclusions: We found that men with GG1 cancer who were upgraded on confirmatory biopsy tend to have less aggressive disease than men with the same grade found at initial biopsy. These results must be confirmed in larger series before recommendations can
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
