| 1. |
- Cappon, Davide, et al.
(författare)
-
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert for Parkinson's Disease Dementia : A 36 Months Follow Up Study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2330-1619. ; 9:6, s. 765-774
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Degeneration of the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) and cortical cholinergic dysfunction are hallmarks of Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). There is no effective therapy for PDD. Deep brain stimulation of the NBM (NBM-DBS) has been trialed as a potential treatment.Objective: Our primary aim was to evaluate the sustained tolerability of NBM-DBS in PDD, and its impact on global cognition, behavioral symptoms, quality of life and caregiver burden and distress. Second, we aimed to determine whether baseline measures of arousal, alertness, and attention were predictive of the three year response to NBM-DBS in PDD patients.Methods: Five of the six PDD patients who completed the baseline assessment participated in a 3 year follow up assessment. We assessed the participants after three years of NBM-DBS on the Mini Mental State Examination, Dementia Rating Scale-2, Blessed Dementia Rating Scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and the SF36.Results: The five patients showed varying trajectories of cognitive decline, with two showing a slower progression over the three-year follow-up period. A slower progression of decline on global cognition was associated with higher baseline accuracy on the Posner covert orienting of attention test, and less daytime sleepiness.Conclusions: Whether slower progression of cognitive decline in two patients was in any way related to individual variability in responsiveness to NBM-DBS requires confirmation in a larger series including an unoperated PDD control group. Higher accuracy in covertly orienting attention and better sleep quality at baseline were associated with better cognitive outcomes at 36 months assessment. These results require validation in future studies with larger samples.
|
|
| 2. |
- Tyagi, Himanshu, et al.
(författare)
-
A randomized trial directly comparing ventral capsule and anteromedial subthalamic nucleus stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder : Clinical and imaging evidence for dissociable effects
- 2022
-
Ingår i: FOCUS. - : American Psychiatric Association Publishing. - 1541-4094 .- 1541-4108. ; 20:1, s. 160-169
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging treatment for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We compared the efficacy of ventral capsule/ventral striatal (VC/VS) and anteromedial subthalamic nucleus (amSTN) DBS in the same patients and tested for mechanistic differences on mood and cognitive flexibility and associated neural circuitry. The possible synergistic benefit of DBS at both sites and cognitive behavioral therapy was explored.Methods: Six patients with treatment-refractory OCD (5 men; Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score >32) entered double-blind counterbalanced phases of 12-week amSTN or VC/VS DBS, followed by 12-week open phases when amSTN and VC/VS were stimulated together, in which optimal stimulation parameters were achieved and adjunctive inpatient cognitive behavioral therapy was delivered. OCD and mood were assessed with standardized scales and cognitive flexibility with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery Intra-Extra Dimensional Set-Shift task. Diffusion-weighted and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed for tractography from optimally activated electrode contacts.Results: DBS at each site significantly and equivalently reduced OCD symptoms with little additional gain following combined stimulation. amSTN but not VC/VS DBS significantly improved cognitive flexibility, whereas VC/VS DBS had a greater effect on mood. The VC/VS effective site was within the VC. VC DBS connected primarily to the medial orbitofrontal cortex, and amSTN DBS to the lateral orbitofrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. No further improvement followed cognitive behavioral therapy, reflecting a floor effect of DBS on OCD.Conclusions: Both the VC/VS and amSTN are effective targets for severe treatment-refractory OCD. Differential improvements in mood and cognitive flexibility and their associated connectivity suggest that DBS at these sites modulates distinct brain networks.
|
|
