| 1. |
- Alkner, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
AIB1 is a predictive factor for tamoxifen response in premenopausal women
- 2010
-
Ingår i: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY. - : Elsevier BV. - 0923-7534 .- 1569-8041. ; 21:2, s. 238-244
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Clinical trials implicate the estrogen receptor ( ER) coactivator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) to be a prognostic and a treatment-predictive factor, although results are not unanimous. We have further investigated this using a controlled randomised trial of tamoxifen versus control. Materials and methods: A total of 564 premenopausal women were entered into a randomised study independent of ER status. Using a tissue microarray, AIB1 and ER were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Results: AIB1 scores were obtained from 349 women. High AIB1 correlated to factors of worse prognosis (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Nottingham histological grade 3, and lymph node metastases) and to ER negativity. In the control arm, high AIB1 was a negative prognostic factor for recurrence- free survival (RFS) (P = 0.02). However, ER-positive patients with high AIB1 responded significantly to tamoxifen treatment (P = 0.002), increasing RFS to the same level as for systemically untreated patients with low AIB1. Although ER-positive patients with low AIB1 had a better RFS from the beginning, this was not further improved by tamoxifen (P = 0.8). Conclusions: In the control group, high AIB1 was a negative prognostic factor. However, ER-positive patients with high AIB1 responded significantly to tamoxifen. This implicates high AIB1 to be an independent predictive factor of improved response to tamoxifen and not, as has previously been discussed, a factor predicting tamoxifen resistance.
|
|
| 2. |
- Alkner, Sara
(författare)
-
Predicting Prognosis and Tamoxifen Response in Breast Cancer. With a special focus on contralateral breast cancer.
- 2012
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- One of the great challenges in breast cancer treatment today is to customize adjuvant treatment to each patient’s individual needs. To do this it is necessary to learn more about the prognostic and treatment predictive factors that determine the risk of relapse and response to a certain mode of treatment. This thesis describes studies on the effect of amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1), a coactivator of the oestrogen receptor, on prognosis and tamoxifen response through a controlled trial on premenopausal patients randomized to tamoxifen or a control group. AIB1 was found to be a negative prognostic factor, although patients with high AIB1 responded very well to tamoxifen. The findings were validated in two independent cohorts, one consisting of premenopausal patients not receiving tamoxifen, and the other of pre- and postmenopausal patients receiving tamoxifen. It has recently been suggested that the effect of AIB1 is modified by paired box 2 gene product (PAX2). PAX2 is a transcription factor important during embryogenesis, and may also play a role in carcinogenesis. This is the first time PAX2 has been investigated in well-defined cohorts of patients receiving or not receiving tamoxifen. PAX2 was not found to affect prognosis on its own, or to modify the effect of AIB1. The second part of this thesis focuses on contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Within their lifetime, previous breast cancer patients have a 2-20% risk of developing a second tumour in the contralateral breast. From the trial on premenopausal patients randomized to tamoxifen or control, it was found that without tamoxifen 12% developed CBC within a median follow-up period of 14 years. This risk was even higher in the youngest women (<40 years), in which 20% developed CBC. Treatment with tamoxifen reduced the risk by 50% in all patients, and by 90% in the youngest women. Since CBC is still a rather rare event, previous studies are often small or based only on register data. Detailed patient, tumour and treatment information has been collected for a large cohort (>700) of patients with CBC in the Southern Healthcare Region of Sweden. From these data it was found that a short time interval between tumours was associated with a poorer prognosis, especially in young patients. This could indicate that some of these CBCs are in fact metastases of the first tumour, and would thus require different treatment. It could also be that tumours that develop soon after previous treatment have developed resistance to treatment and are of a more aggressive phenotype. Finally, it was found that patients who first noticed symptoms of their CBC themselves had a higher risk of developing metastases than patients diagnosed by mammography or clinical examination in a follow-up programme. The difference in prognosis in relation to mode of detection remained even when the time interval between tumours was ≥10 years, indicating that a long follow-up period is valuable.
|
|
| 3. |
- Alkner, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
Prediction of outcome after diagnosis of metachronous contralateral breast cancer.
- 2011
-
Ingår i: BMC Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2407. ; 11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Although 2-20% of breast cancer patients develop a contralateral breast cancer (CBC), prognosis after CBC is still debated. Using a unique patient cohort, we have investigated whether time interval to second breast cancer (BC2) and mode of detection are associated to prognosis. METHODS: Information on patient-, tumour-, treatment-characteristics, and outcome was abstracted from patients' individual charts for all patients diagnosed with metachronous CBC in the Southern Healthcare Region of Sweden from 1977-2007. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and risk of distant metastases were primary endpoints. RESULTS: The cohort included 723 patients with metachronous contralateral breast cancer as primary breast cancer event. Patients with less than three years to BC2 had a significantly impaired DDFS (p = 0.01), and in sub-group analysis, this effect was seen primarily in patients aged <50. By logistic regression analysis, patients diagnosed with BC2 within routine follow-up examinations had a significantly lower risk of developing metastases compared to those who were symptomatic at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). Chemotherapy given after breast BC1 was a negative prognostic factor for DDFS, whereas endocrine treatment and radiotherapy given after BC2 improved DDFS. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with CBC, we found the time interval to BC2 to be a strong prognostic factor for DDFS in young women and mode of detection to be related to risk of distant metastases. Future studies of tumour biology of BC2 in relation to prognostic factors found in the present study can hopefully provide biological explanations to these findings.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Alkner, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
The role of AIB1 and PAX2 in primary breast cancer: validation of AIB1 as a negative prognostic factor.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1569-8041 .- 0923-7534. ; 24:5, s. 1244-1252
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundThe steroid-receptor coactivator amplified in breast cancer one (AIB1) is implicated to be a prognostic factor, although the results are not unanimous. Recently its effect was suggested to be modified by paired box 2 gene product (PAX2).Patients and methodsUsing immunohistochemistry (IHC) AIB1 and PAX2 were investigated in two cohorts of early breast cancer, including systemically untreated premenopausal lymph-node-negative women and pre- and postmenopausal women receiving tamoxifen.ResultsAIB1 scores were available for 490 patients and PAX2 scores were available for 463 patients. High AIB1 was a negative prognostic factor for distant disease-free survival (DDFS, P = 0.02) and overall survival (OS, P < 0.001) in systemically untreated women, while no prognostic effect was seen in the tamoxifen-treated cohort, indicating AIB1 to be a predictor of tamoxifen response. In systemically untreated patients, PAX2 was not a prognostic factor, nor did it modify the effect of AIB1. However, in ER-positive patients receiving tamoxifen, PAX2 appeared to be a positive prognostic factor in premenopausal patients, while a negative factor in postmenopausal. The interaction between the menopausal status and PAX2 was significant (P = 0.01).ConclusionsIn an independent cohort of low-risk premenopausal patients, we validate AIB1 as a negative prognostic factor, indicating AIB1 to be an interesting target for new anti-cancer therapies. The effect of PAX2 warrants further studies.
|
|
| 8. |
- Sandberg, Maria E. C., et al.
(författare)
-
Influence of radiotherapy for the first tumor on aggressiveness of contralateral breast cancer
- 2013
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cancer. - : Wiley. - 0020-7136 .- 1097-0215. ; 132:10, s. 2388-2394
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We aimed to investigate if characteristics of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) are influenced by adjuvant radiotherapy for the first breast cancer. Using information from population-based registers and medical records, we analyzed two cohorts comprising all women with CBC diagnosed >3 months after their first cancer (809 patients in Stockholm 19762005 and 750 patients in South Sweden 19772005). We used Poisson regression to calculate risk of distant metastasis after CBC, comparing patients treated and not treated with radiotherapy for the first cancer. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) of more aggressive tumor characteristics in the second cancer, compared to the first. For patients with CBC in Stockholm with <5 years between the cancers radiotherapy for the first cancer conferred a nearly doubled risk of distant metastasis [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.272.88], compared to those not treated with radiotherapy. This was replicated in the South Swedish cohort [IRR = 2.12 (95% CI: 1.403.23)]. In Stockholm, we found an increased odds that, following radiotherapy, a second cancer was of more advanced TNM-stage [OR 2.16 (95% CI 1.134.11)] and higher histological grade [OR = 2.00 (95% CI 1.083.72)] compared to the first, for patients with CBC with <5 years between the cancers. No effect on any of the investigated outcomes was seen for patients diagnosed with CBC >5 years from the first cancer. In conclusion, patients diagnosed with CBC within 5 years had worse prognosis and more aggressive tumor characteristics of the second cancer, if they had received radiotherapy for their first cancer, compared to no radiotherapy.
|
|
