| 1. |
- Barrington, Sally F., et al.
(författare)
-
Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1619-7070 .- 1619-7089. ; 37:10, s. 1824-1833
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To determine if PET reporting criteria for the Response Adapted Treatment in Hodgkin Lymphoma (RATHL) trial could enable satisfactory agreement to be reached between 'core' laboratories operating in different countries. Four centres reported scans from 50 patients with stage II-IV HL, acquired before and after two cycles of Adriamycin/bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine. A five-point scale was used to score response scans using 'normal' mediastinum and liver as reference levels. Centres read scans independently of each other. The level of agreement between centres was determined assuming (1) that uptake in sites involved at diagnosis that was higher than liver uptake represented disease (conservative reading), and (2) that uptake in sites involved at diagnosis that was higher than mediastinal uptake represented disease (sensitive reading). There was agreement that the response scan was 'positive' or 'negative' for lymphoma in 44 patients with a conservative reading and in 41 patients with a sensitive reading. Kappa was 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.96) for conservative reading and 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.90) for sensitive reading. Agreement was reached in 46 and 44 patients after discussion for the conservative and sensitive readings, respectively. The criteria developed for reporting in the RATHL trial are sufficiently robust to be used in a multicentre setting.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kjölhede, Henrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Combined (18) F-fluorocholine and (18) F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for staging of high-risk prostate cancer.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: BJU International. - 1464-4096. ; 110:10, s. 1501-1506
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study Type - Diagnosis (cohort) Level of Evidence 2a What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with choline and fluoride for the detection of metastases in patients with prostate cancer have each been evaluated, with mixed results. Choline PET/CT has been evaluated against pelvic lymphadenectomy, generally with a low sensitivity but a high specificity; however, the study populations have been heterogenous. Fluoride PET/CT has been evaluated against other imaging methods, such as bone scan, single photon emission CT and MRI, and has been shown to have high specificity as well as sensitivity for bone metastases, but there are no studies with biopsy verification. This is the first study that evaluates the clinical use of both choline and fluoride PET/CT on the same patients in a well-defined population of patients with high-risk prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: • To investigate how often positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, with both (18) F-fluorocholine and (18) F-fluoride as markers, add clinically relevant information for patients with prostate cancer who have high-risk tumours and a normal or inconclusive planar bone scan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Patients with prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels between 20 and 99 ng/mL and/or Gleason score 8-10 tumours, planned for treatment with curative intent based on routine staging with a negative or inconclusive bone scan, were further investigated with a (18) F-fluorocholine and a (18) F-fluoride PET/CT. • None of the patients received hormonal therapy before the staging procedures were completed. RESULTS: • For 50 of the 90 included patients (56%) one or both PET/CT scans indicated metastases. • (18) F-fluorocholine PET/CT indicated lymph node metastases and/or bone metastases in 35 patients (39%). • (18) F-fluoride PET/CT was suggestive for bone metastases in 37 patients (41%). • In 18 patients (20%) the PET/CT scans indicated widespread metastases, leading to a change in therapy intent from curative to non-curative. • Of the patients with positive scans, 74% had Gleason score 8-10 tumours. Of the patients with Gleason score 8-10 tumours, 64% had positive scans. CONCLUSIONS: • PET/CT scans with (18) F-fluorocholine and (18) F-fluoride commonly detect metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and a negative or inconclusive bone scan. • For 20% of the patients the results of the PET/CT scans changed the treatment plan.
|
|
| 3. |
- Sjövall, Johanna, et al.
(författare)
-
Radiotherapy response in head and neck cancer - evaluation of the primary tumour site
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1651-2251 .- 0001-6489. ; 134:6, s. 646-651
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Conclusion: PET-CT scans seem to be sufficient to rule out residual tumour at the primary site. Patients with positive or equivocal PET findings should be scheduled for endoscopy with biopsy or a second PET-CT scan. Objectives: Assessment of remission at the primary site, in patients treated with organ preservation therapy with curative intent, is important to identify residual tumours requiring treatment with salvage surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) after radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in assessing primary site response in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods: A total of 82 patients, with a positive baseline PET-CT scan before start of treatment, were evaluated with a PET-CT scan 6-7 weeks post-radiotherapy and with a clinical examination/endoscopy with or without biopsy 1-2 weeks later. The majority of patients had p16-positive oropharyngeal tumours. Results: Post-treatment, 77% of the patients had no visible hypermetabolism. If equivocal PET scans are regarded as positive, the sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy were 100%, 78%, 100%, 6% and 78%, respectively. Eight patients suffered from relapses involving the primary site during the 9-month follow-up.
|
|
