| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Haque, Mohammad M., et al.
(författare)
-
Cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus : economic evaluation of the TOBOGM study, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial
- 2024
-
Ingår i: eClinicalMedicine. - : Elsevier. - 2589-5370. ; 71
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: A recently undertaken multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) "Treatment Of BOoking Gestational diabetes Mellitus" (TOBOGM: 2017-2022) found that the diagnosis and treatment of pregnant women with early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) improved pregnancy outcomes. Based on data from the trial, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early GDM (from <20 weeks') among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy compared with usual care (no treatment until 24-28 weeks') from a healthcare perspective.METHODS: Participants' healthcare resource utilization data were collected from their self-reported questionnaires and hospital records, and valued using the unit costs obtained from standard Australian national sources. Costs were reported in US dollars ($) using the purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates to facilitate comparison of costs across countries. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was followed. Missing cost data were replaced using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping method was used to estimate the uncertainty around mean cost difference and cost-effectiveness results. Bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were used to plot the cost-effectiveness (CE) plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC).FINDINGS: Diagnosis and treatment of early GDM was more effective and tended to be less costly, i.e., dominant (cost-saving) [-5.6% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -10.1%, -1.2%), -$1373 (95% CI: -$3,749, $642)] compared with usual care. Our findings were confirmed by both the CE plane (88% of the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs fall in the south-west quadrant), and CEAC (the probability of the intervention being cost-effective ranged from 84% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value of $10,000-99% at a WTP threshold value of $100,000 per composite adverse pregnancy outcome prevented). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women in the higher glycemic range (fasting blood glucose 95-109 mg/dl [5.3-6.0 mmol/L], 1-h blood glucose ≥191 mg/dl [10.6 mmol/L] and/or 2-h blood glucose 162-199 mg/dl [9.0-11.0 mmol/L]) was more effective and less costly (dominant) [-7.8% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -14.6%, -0.9%), -$2795 (95% CI: -$6,638, -$533)]; the intervention was more effective and tended to be less costly [-8.9% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -15.1%, -2.6%), -$5548 (95% CI: -$16,740, $1547)] among women diagnosed before 14 weeks' gestation as well. INTERPRETATION: Our findings highlight the potential health and economic benefits from the diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy and supports its implementation. Long-term follow-up studies are recommended as a key future area of research to assess the potential long-term health benefits and economic consequences of the intervention.
|
|
| 4. |
- Harreiter, Jürgen, et al.
(författare)
-
Behandlung von früh diagnostiziertem Gestationsdiabetes mellitus vor der 20. Schwangerschaftswoche : [Treatment of early diagnosed Gestational Diabetes mellitus before the 20th Week of Pregnancy]
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. - : Springer. - 0043-5325 .- 1613-7671. ; 135:Suppl. 7, s. S762-S762
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Einleitung: Bei Diagnose eines Gestationsdiabetes (GDM) vor der 20.Schwangerschaftswoche (SSW) wird leitliniengemäß eine Therapie begonnen. Für diese Praxis liegt keine Evidenz vor, die eine Verbesserung der Gesundheit von Mutter oder Nachkommen bei GDM-Behandlung in der frühen Schwangerschaft belegt.Methoden: Frauen mit einem Risikofaktor für GDM wurden zwischen 4.−20.SSW bei Vorliegen einer GDM Diagnose nach WHO 2013 Kriterien randomisiert einer Behandlungsgruppe oder einer Kontrollgruppe zugeordnet. Die Behandlungs-gruppe erhielt sofortige GDM Behandlung, während die Kontrollgruppe je nach Ergebnissen eines erneuten oralen Glukosetoleranztests (OGTT) in der 24.−28.SSW eine verschobene oder keine Behandlung erhielt. Die Studie hatte drei primäre Endpunkte: eine Kombination ungünstiger neonataler Ereignisse (Geburt <37.SSW, Geburtstrauma, Geburtsgewicht ≥4500 g, RDS, Phototherapie, Totgeburt/neonataler Tod oder Schulterdystokie), schwangerschaftsbedingte Hypertonieerkrankungen (Präeklampsie, Eklampsie, gestationsbedingter Bluthochdruck) und neonatale fettfreie Körpermasse.Ergebnisse: Insgesamt wurden 802 Frauen randomisiert (406 Sofortbehandlung, 396 Kontrollgruppe). Die Erstvisite fand durchschnittlich in der 15,6 ± 2,5 SSW statt. Der neonatale Kombinationsendpunkt trat bei 94/378 Frauen (24,9 %) bei sofortiger Behandlung und bei 113/370 Frauen (30,5 %) in der Kontrollgruppe auf (adj. Risikounterschied −5,6 %;95 % KI,–10,1;−1,2, RR 0,82;0,68-0,98). Schwangerschaftsbedingter Bluthochdruck trat bei 40/378 Frauen (10,6 %) bei sofortiger Behandlung und bei 37/372 Frauen (9,9 %) in der Kontrollgruppe auf (0,7 %,95 % KI,–1,6;2,9, RR 1.08;0.85–1.38). Die fettfreie Körpermasse der Neugeborenen betrug 2,86 kg bei sofortiger Behandlung und 2,91 kg in der Kontrollgruppe (−0,04 kg; 95 % KI,–0,09;0,02). Untergruppenanalysen zeigten eine stärkere Wirkung der Intervention auf neonatale Ergebnisse bei Frauen mit höheren Blutzuckerwerten und bei OGTT Durchführung vor der 14.SSW.Schlussfolgerung: Die sofortige Behandlung von Gestationsdiabetes vor der 20.SSW führte zu einer geringeren Häufigkeit ungünstiger neonataler Ergebnisse im Vergleich zu späterem Behandlungsbeginn.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Simmons, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Perinatal Outcomes in Early and Late Gestational Diabetes Mellitus After Treatment From 24-28 Weeks' Gestation : A TOBOGM Secondary Analysis
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Diabetes Care. - : American Diabetes Association. - 0149-5992 .- 1935-5548.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: In most gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) studies, cohorts have included women combined into study populations without regard to whether hyperglycemia was present earlier in pregnancy. In this study we sought to compare perinatal outcomes between groups: women with early GDM (EGDM group: diagnosis before 20 weeks but no treatment until 24-28 weeks if GDM still present), with late GDM (LGDM group: present only at 24-28 weeks), and with normoglycemia at 24-28 weeks (control subjects).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled treatment trial where we studied, among women with risk factors, early (<20 weeks' gestation) GDM defined according to World Health Organization 2013 criteria. Those receiving early treatment for GDM treatment were excluded. GDM was treated if present at 24-28 weeks. The primary outcome was a composite of birth before 37 weeks' gestation, birth weight ≥4,500 g, birth trauma, neonatal respiratory distress, phototherapy, stillbirth/neonatal death, and shoulder dystocia. Comparisons included adjustment for age, ethnicity, BMI, site, smoking, primigravity, and education.RESULTS: Women with EGDM (n = 254) and LGDM (n = 467) had shorter pregnancy duration than control subjects (n = 2,339). BMI was lowest with LGDM. The composite was increased with EGDM (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.12)) but not LGDM (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.94-1.50). Induction of labor was higher in both GDM groups. In comparisons with control subjects there were higher birth centile, higher preterm birth rate, and higher rate of neonatal jaundice for the EGDM group (but not the LGDM group). The greatest need for insulin and/or metformin was with EGDM.CONCLUSIONS: Adverse perinatal outcomes were increased with EGDM despite treatment from 24-28 weeks' gestation, suggesting the need to initiate treatment early, and more aggressively, to reduce the effects of exposure to the more severe maternal hyperglycemia from early pregnancy.
|
|
| 8. |
- Simmons, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Regression From Early GDM to Normal Glucose Tolerance and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in the Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Diabetes Care. - 0149-5992 .- 1935-5548.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes among women with a normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before 20 weeks' gestation (early) and at 24-28 weeks' gestation (late) (no gestational diabetes mellitus, or No-GDM), those with early GDM randomized to observation with a subsequent normal OGTT (GDM-Regression), and those with GDM on both occasions (GDM-Maintained).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Women at <20 weeks' gestation with GDM risk factors who were recruited for a randomized controlled early GDM treatment trial were included. Women with treated early GDM and late GDM (according to the World Health Organization's 2013 criteria) were excluded from this analysis. Logistic regression compared pregnancy outcomes.RESULTS: GDM-Regression (n = 121) group risk factor profiles and OGTT results generally fell between the No-GDM (n = 2,218) and GDM-Maintained (n = 254) groups, with adjusted incidences of pregnancy complications similar between the GDM-Regression and No-GDM groups.CONCLUSIONS: Women with early GDM but normal OGTT at 24-28 weeks' gestation had pregnancy outcomes that were similar to those of individuals without GDM. Identifying early GDM likely to regress would allow treatment to be avoided.
|
|
| 9. |
- Simmons, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy
- 2023
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - : Massachusetts Medical Society. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 388:23, s. 2132-2144
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Whether treatment of gestational diabetes before 20 weeks' gestation improves maternal and infant health is unclear.METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, women between 4 weeks' and 19 weeks 6 days' gestation who had a risk factor for hyperglycemia and a diagnosis of gestational diabetes (World Health Organization 2013 criteria) to receive immediate treatment for gestational diabetes or deferred or no treatment, depending on the results of a repeat oral glucose-tolerance test [OGTT] at 24 to 28 weeks' gestation (control). The trial included three primary outcomes: a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (birth at <37 weeks' gestation, birth trauma, birth weight of ≥4500 g, respiratory distress, phototherapy, stillbirth or neonatal death, or shoulder dystocia), pregnancy-related hypertension (preeclampsia, eclampsia, or gestational hypertension), and neonatal lean body mass.RESULTS: A total of 802 women underwent randomization; 406 were assigned to the immediate-treatment group and 396 to the control group; follow-up data were available for 793 women (98.9%). An initial OGTT was performed at a mean (±SD) gestation of 15.6±2.5 weeks. An adverse neonatal outcome event occurred in 94 of 378 women (24.9%) in the immediate-treatment group and in 113 of 370 women (30.5%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, -5.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.1 to -1.2). Pregnancy-related hypertension occurred in 40 of 378 women (10.6%) in the immediate-treatment group and in 37 of 372 women (9.9%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.6 to 2.9). The mean neonatal lean body mass was 2.86 g in the immediate-treatment group and 2.91 g in the control group (adjusted mean difference, -0.04 g; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.02). No between-group differences were observed with respect to serious adverse events associated with screening and treatment.CONCLUSIONS: Immediate treatment of gestational diabetes before 20 weeks' gestation led to a modestly lower incidence of a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes than no immediate treatment; no material differences were observed for pregnancy-related hypertension or neonatal lean body mass. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and others; TOBOGM Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12616000924459.).
|
|
| 10. |
- Valgeirsdóttir, Inga Rós, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Metformin as treatment of GDM
- 2023
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Whether metformin should be used as treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a matter of controversy. Concerns about the effects on neonatal birth weight (mainly small for gestational age, SGA) have been raised in one randomized controlled trial in type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. [1] The aim of this study was to evaluate pregnancy outcomes based on different GDM treatment modalities with focus on metformin.Methods: A cohort study, based on data from the stepped wedge cluster randomized trial; CDC4G (Changing diagnostic criteria for GDM in Sweden - www.cdc4g.se). Screening for GDM involved repeated random plasma glucose measurements and/or clinical risk factors. [2] Data were collected from electronic case record forms, and national health and quality registers. Singleton pregnancies during 2018 (last birth in August 2019) from eight clusters were included. Women with pregestational diabetes and/or previous gastric bypass surgery were excluded. Pregnancy outcomes for different treatment regimens were analyzed for women with GDM compared to the background population without GDM. Logistic regression analyzes with adjustments for confounders (body mass index, age, smoking, country of birth, chronic hypertensive disease and cluster) was performed (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)) for all outcomes. Results: Of the 54 678 pregnancies included, 2 169 (4.0%) were diagnosed with GDM; of whom 1 076 (49.6%) were treated with diet only (dGDM), 668 (30.8%) with metformin only (mGDM), 116 (5.3%) with insulin only (iGDM), and 309 (14.2%) with both metformin and insulin (miGDM). Pregnancy outcomes were as follows: SGA (10th percentile) was significantly decreased in the mGDM group [aOR 0.57 (95% CI 0.41-0.79)] compared to the background population and no significant difference was found in the miGDM group [aOR 0.78 (95% CI 0.51-1.18)] compared to the background population. No significant difference in SGA (10th percentile) was found in the dGDM group [aOR 1.02 (CI 0.83-1.25)] compared to the background population. There was significant difference in neonates born large for gestational age (LGA, 90th percentile) in both mGDM and miGDM groups compared to the background population [aOR 2.29 (95% CI 1.88-2.78) and aOR 2.32 (95% CI 1.76-3.07), respectively]. There was not significant difference in LGA (90th percentile) in dGDM compared to the background population [aOR 0.90 (95% CI 0.73-1.12].Conclusions: These preliminary unpublished results show no increase in SGA for metformin treated GDM compared to the background population. Outcomes in the diet treated GDM group were similar to the background population. Further analyzes are needed to compare outcomes between pharmacologic treatment groups and assess whether specific treatment regimens lead to similar outcomes in different subgroups (eg ethnicity, obesity and glucose values on diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test).References:1.Feig DS, Donovan LE, Zinman B, Sanchez JJ, Asztalos E, Ryan EA, et al. Metformin in women with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy (MiTy): a multicentre, international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology. 2020;8(10):834-44.2.Fadl H, Saeedi M, Montgomery S, Magnuson A, Schwarcz E, Berntorp K, et al. Changing diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Sweden - a stepped wedge national cluster randomised controlled trial - the CDC4G study protocol. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2019;19(1):398.
|
|
