| 1. |
- Bengtsson, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Correlation between ADC, ADC ratio, and Gleason Grade group in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy : Retrospective multicenter study with different MRI scanners
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Oncology. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 2234-943X. ; 13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: MRI is an important tool in the prostate cancer work-up, with special emphasis on the ADC sequence. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between ADC and ADC ratio compared to tumor aggressiveness determined by a histopathological examination after radical prostatectomy.Methods: Ninety-eight patients with prostate cancer underwent MRI at five different hospitals prior to radical prostatectomy. Images were retrospectively analyzed individually by two radiologists. The ADC of the index lesion and reference tissues (contralateral normal prostatic, normal peripheral zone, and urine) was recorded. Absolute ADC and different ADC ratios were compared to tumor aggressivity according to the ISUP Gleason Grade Groups extracted from the pathology report using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). ROC curves were used to evaluate the ability to discriminate between ISUP 1-2 and ISUP 3-5 and intra class correlation and Bland-Altman plots for interrater reliability.Results: All patients had prostate cancer classified as ISUP grade ≥ 2. No correlation was found between ADC and ISUP grade. We found no benefit of using the ADC ratio over absolute ADC. The AUC for all metrics was close to 0.5, and no threshold could be extracted for prediction of tumor aggressivity. The interrater reliability was substantial to almost perfect for all variables analyzed.Conclusions: ADC and ADC ratio did not correlate with tumor aggressiveness defined by ISUP grade in this multicenter MRI study. The result of this study is opposite to previous research in the field.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ludwigs, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Poor inter-observer agreement in anatomical classifications of infrapopliteal arterial disease due to mandatory selection of only one target artery
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Acta Radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 64:3, s. 1298-1306
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Established anatomical classifications of infrapopliteal arterial lesion severity are based on assessment of only one target artery, not including all infrapopliteal arteries although multivessel revascularization is common. Purpose To investigate the reproducibility of one of these classifications and a new aggregated score. Material and Methods A total of 68 patients undergoing endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization at Sahlgrenska University Hospital during 2008-2016 were included. Preoperative magnetic resonance angiographies (MRA) and digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) were evaluated by three blinded observers in random order, using the infrapopliteal TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II classification. An aggregated score, the Infrapopliteal Total Atherosclerotic Burden (I-TAB) score, including all infrapopliteal arteries, was constructed and used for comparison. Results Inter-observer agreement on lesion severity for each evaluated artery was good; Krippendorff's alpha for MRA 0.64-0.79 and DSA 0.66-0.84. Inter-observer agreement on TASC II grade, based on the selected target artery as stipulated, was poor; Krippendorff's alpha 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]=-0.05 to 0.30) for MRA and 0.48 (95% CI=0.33-0.61) for DSA. Inter-observer agreement for the new I-TAB score was good; Krippendorff's alpha 0.76 (95% CI=0.70-0.81) for MRA and 0.79 (95% CI=0.74-0.84) for DSA. Conclusion Reproducible assessment of infrapopliteal lesion severity can be achieved for separate arteries with both MRA and DSA using the TASC II definitions. However, poor inter-observer agreement in selecting the target artery results in low reproducibility of the overall infrapopliteal TASC II grade. An aggregated score, such as I-TAB, results in less variability and may provide a more robust evaluation tool of atherosclerotic disease severity.
|
|
