| 1. |
- Biasiotto, Roberta, et al.
(författare)
-
The dynamic consent of the Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study : broad aim within specific oversight and communication
- 2021
-
Ingår i: BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO. - : UNIV TRENTO, FAC LAW. - 2284-4503. ; :1, s. 277-287
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In biobanking and genomics research, data and samples are stored for long time and used in further studies, which may not be sufficiently specified or foreseen at the time of the initial consent. The dynamic consent of the CHRIS study integrates broad research aims, specific oversight and governance mechanisms, and continuous communication with participants, and allows nuanced choices to be changed over time. With this paper, we describe the CHRIS dynamic consent, and illustrate, by discussing data sharing and ongoing consent in the CHRIS study, how dynamic consent can actualize an informed consent model that is suitable for biobanking and genomic research.
|
|
| 2. |
- Mascalzoni, Deborah, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Human Genetics. - : Springer Nature. - 1018-4813 .- 1476-5438. ; 29:7, s. 1146-1157
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Recall by genotype (RbG) studies aim to better understand the phenotypes that correspond to genetic variants of interest, by recruiting carriers of such variants for further phenotyping. RbG approaches pose major ethical and legal challenges related to the disclosure of possibly unwanted genetic information. The Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study is a longitudinal cohort study based in South Tyrol, Italy. Demand has grown for CHRIS study participants to be enrolled in RbG studies, thus making the design of a suitable ethical framework a pressing need. We here report upon the design of a pilot RbG study conducted with CHRIS study participants. By reviewing the literature and by consulting relevant stakeholders (CHRIS participants, clinical geneticists, ethics board, GPs), we identified key ethical issues in RbG approaches (e.g. complexity of the context, communication of genetic results, measures to further protect participants). The design of the pilot was based on a feasibility assessment, the selection of a suitable test case within the ProtectMove Research Unit on reduced penetrance of hereditary movement disorders, and the development of appropriate recruitment and communication strategies. An empirical study was embedded in the pilot study with the aim of understanding participants' views on RbG. Our experience with the pilot study in CHRIS allowed us to contribute to the development of best practices and policies for RbG studies by drawing recommendations: addressing the possibility of RbG in the original consent, implementing tailored communication strategies, engaging stakeholders, designing embedded empirical studies, and sharing research experiences and methodology.
|
|
