| 1. |
- Collett-Solberg, Paulo F., et al.
(författare)
-
Diagnosis, Genetics, and Therapy of Short Stature in Children : A Growth Hormone Research Society International Perspective
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Hormone Research in Paediatrics. - : S. Karger. - 1663-2818 .- 1663-2826. ; 92:1, s. 1-14
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Growth Hormone Research Society (GRS) convened a Workshop in March 2019 to evaluate the diagnosis and therapy of short stature in children. Forty-six international experts participated at the invitation of GRS including clinicians, basic scientists, and representatives from regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry. Following plenary presentations addressing the current diagnosis and therapy of short stature in children, breakout groups discussed questions produced in advance by the planning committee and reconvened to share the group reports. A writing team assembled one document that was subsequently discussed and revised by participants. Participants from regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies were not part of the writing process. Short stature is the most common reason for referral to the pediatric endocrinologist. History, physical examination, and auxology remain the most important methods for understanding the reasons for the short stature. While some long-standing topics of controversy continue to generate debate, including in whom, and how, to perform and interpret growth hormone stimulation tests, new research areas are changing the clinical landscape, such as the genetics of short stature, selection of patients for genetic testing, and interpretation of genetic tests in the clinical setting. What dose of growth hormone to start, how to adjust the dose, and how to identify and manage a suboptimal response are still topics to debate. Additional areas that are expected to transform the growth field include the development of long-acting growth hormone preparations and other new therapeutics and diagnostics that may increase adult height or aid in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency.
|
|
| 2. |
- Stewart, Paul M, et al.
(författare)
-
Exploring Inpatient Hospitalizations and Morbidity in Patients With Adrenal Insufficiency.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. - : The Endocrine Society. - 1945-7197 .- 0021-972X. ; 101:12, s. 4843-4850
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) (primary AI [PAI], secondary AI due to a pituitary disorder [PIT] and congenital adrenal hyperplasia [CAH]) have reduced life expectancy; however, the underlying explanation remains unknown.To evaluate characteristics, comorbidities, and hospitalizations in AI patients.Retrospective observational.Using a United States-based national payer database comprising of more than 108 million members, strict inclusion criteria including diagnostic codes and steroid prescription records were used to identify 10 383 adults with AI; 1014 with PAI, 8818 with PIT, and 551 with CAH. Patients were matched 1:1 to controls, based on age (±5 y), gender, insurance, and region and followed for more than 12 months.None.Demographic variables, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus [DM] types 1 and 2, depression, anxiety, hyperlipidemia, hypertension) and hospitalization incidence.Compared with controls, patients with AI had higher odds of DM, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, depression, and anxiety, ranging from an odds ratio (OR) of 1.51 for hyperlipidaemia in PAI to 3.85 for DM in CAH. Odds of having DM (OR, 3.85; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-5.90) or anxiety (OR, 2.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-4.42) compared with controls were highest in CAH, whereas depression was highest in PAI and PIT (OR, 2.40 and 2.55). ORs of hyperlipidaemia and hypertension (OR, 1.98 and 2.24) were highest in the PIT cohort. Inpatient admissions were more frequent in PAI (4.64:1; P < .0001) and PIT (4.00:1; P < .0001) than controls; infection was the most common cause for admission.Patients with AI carry a significant metabolic and psychiatric burden, with higher risk of comorbidities and hospital admissions than matched controls.
|
|
| 3. |
- Burman, Pia, et al.
(författare)
-
Radiotherapy, especially at young age, increases the risk for de novo brain tumors in patients treated for pituitary/sellar lesions
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. - : The Endocrine Society. - 0021-972X .- 1945-7197. ; 102:3, s. 1051-1058
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Context: De novo brain tumors developing after treatment of pituitary/sellar lesions have been reported, but it is unknown whether this is linked to any of the treatment modalities. Objective: To study the occurrence of malignant brain tumors and meningiomas in a large cohort of patients treated for pituitary/sellar lesions, with special emphasis on the role of radiotherapy (RT). Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 8917) who were hypopituitary due to pituitary adenomas, craniopharyngiomas, and other sellar tumors followed in KIMS (Pfizer International Metabolic Database) from 1994 to 2012 were included. Treatment consisted of surgery and/or medical therapy in 4927 patients, RT alone, or with surgery in 3236 patients; data were missing in 754. Incidence rate ratios (RRs) were analyzed through Poisson regression methods with internal comparisons. Results: During 53,786 patient-years, 17 cases of malignant brain tumors (13 exposed to RT) and 27 meningiomas (22 exposed to RT) were reported. RR for RT vs no RT was 3.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06 to 10.6] for malignant brain tumors, and 4.06 (95% CI, 1.51 to 10.9) for meningiomas. The risk of developing a malignant brain tumor increased by 2.4-fold (P = 0.005) and meningioma by 1.6-fold with every 10 years of younger age at RT (P = 0.05). Incidence rates were similar in patients treated with conventional RT compared with stereotactic RT. Conclusion: RT of pituitary tumors is associated with increased risk of developing malignant brain tumors and meningiomas, especially when given at younger ages. In balancing risks and benefits of RT, our findings emphasize that special consideration should be given to the age of the patient.
|
|
