| 1. |
- Engstrand, J., et al.
(författare)
-
Liver resection and ablation for squamous cell carcinoma liver metastases
- 2021
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press. - 2474-9842. ; 5:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists to guide the management of patients with liver metastases from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to describe patterns of disease recurrence after liver resection/ablation for SCC liver metastases and factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).METHOD: Members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association were invited to include all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection/ablation for SCC liver metastases between 2002 and 2019. Patient, tumour and perioperative characteristics were analysed with regard to RFS and OS.RESULTS: Among the 102 patients included from 24 European centres, 56 patients had anal cancer, and 46 patients had SCC from other origin. RFS in patients with anal cancer and non-anal cancer was 16 and 9 months, respectively (P = 0.134). A positive resection margin significantly influenced RFS for both anal cancer and non-anal cancer liver metastases (hazard ratio 6.82, 95 per cent c.i. 2.40 to 19.35, for the entire cohort). Median survival duration and 5-year OS rate among patients with anal cancer and non-anal cancer were 50 months and 45 per cent and 21 months and 25 per cent, respectively. For the entire cohort, only non-radical resection was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 3.21, 95 per cent c.i. 1.24 to 8.30).CONCLUSION: Liver resection/ablation of liver metastases from SCC can result in long-term survival. Survival was superior in treated patients with liver metastases from anal versus non-anal cancer. A negative resection margin is paramount for acceptable outcome.
|
|
| 2. |
- Johansen, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
High resection rate improves overall survival in elderly patients with pancreatic head cancer - A cohort study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Surgery Open. - : Elsevier Science Ltd. - 2405-8572. ; 34
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: There is evidence that a high hospital volume of pancreaticoduodenectomy improves short-and long-term outcomes, but there are few population-based studies on the effect of a high resection rate in the population. The aim of this national, observational study was primarily to investigate differences in overall survival among elderly patients with cancer in the pancreatic head between high and low resection rate groups and secondarily to determine if counties with high resection rates of pancreaticoduodenectomy had more severe complications after surgery. Materials and methods: All patients in the Swedish National Registry for tumours in the pancreatic and periampullary region diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 with pancreatic head cancer were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into low and high resection rate groups according to the yearly resection rates in the respective counties. For operative outcomes, all patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy were included regardless of diagnosis. The primary outcome of the study was overall survival among patients aged >= 70 years with pancreatic head cancer. Results: Among 13 933 patients in the registry, 7661 were 70 years or older, of whom 3006 had pancreatic head cancer. Overall survival was longer in high resection rate groups for patients aged >= 70 years, as for the age subgroups 70-79 years and >= 80 years (all p < 0.001). Among patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy aged >= 80 years the high resection rate counties showed an increased rate of severe complications, but no increase in 90-day mortality. Conclusion: High resection rate groups show a significantly longer overall survival among elderly patients with pancreatic head cancer in Sweden. This implies that there could be a survival benefit from increasing resections in low resection rate groups. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd.
|
|
| 3. |
- Johansson, Anna, 1982-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient-reported recovery in upper abdominal cancer surgery care : A prospective study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Science Progress. - : Sage Publications. - 0036-8504 .- 2047-7163. ; 104:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The study aimed to describe and analyse patient-reported recovery in patients after upper abdominal cancer surgery. This study had a quantitative design and patients were consecutively included in a university hospital in southern Sweden. Twenty-four patients answered the Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP) questionnaire at three measurement points. All five dimensions were affected. In the physical symptoms dimension, the majority of patients reported a lack of energy upon discharge. High levels of anxiety were reported. Over 50% of patients reported some degree of depressed mood at all three measurement points. In the social dimension, the majority of patients reported some degree of being dependent on help from others in everyday life at 4?weeks after discharge. Few patients are fully recovered at 4?weeks after discharge. Individual patient-reported recovery estimates may be valuable in identifying and planning interventions tailored to each patients needs throughout the care process.
|
|
| 4. |
- Korrel, Maarten, et al.
(författare)
-
Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: an individual patient data meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials
- 2021
-
Ingår i: HPB. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 1365-182X .- 1477-2574. ; 23:3, s. 323-330
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has been suggested to reduce postoperative outcomes as compared to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Recently, the first randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MIDP to ODP were published. This individual patient data meta analysis compared outcomes after MIDP versus ODP combining data from both RCTs. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify RCTs on MIDP vs. ODP, and individual patient data were harmonized. Primary endpoint was the rate of major (Clavien-Dindo > III) complications. Sensitivity analyses were performed in high-risk subgroups. Results: A total of 166 patients from the LEOPARD and LAPOP RCTs were included. The rate of major complications was 21% after MIDP vs. 35% after ODP (adjusted odds ratio 0.54; p = 0.148). MIDP significantly reduced length of hospital stay (6 vs. 8 days, p = 0.036), and delayed gastric emptying (4% vs. 16%, p = 0.049), as compared to ODP. A trend towards higher rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula was observed after MIDP (36% vs. 28%, p = 0.067). Outcomes were comparable in high-risk subgroups. Conclusion: This individual patient data meta-analysis showed that MIDP, when performed by trained surgeons, may be regarded as the preferred approach for distal pancreatectomy. Outcomes are improved after MIDP as compared to ODP, without obvious downsides in high-risk subgroups.
|
|
