| 1. |
- Högberg, Thomas, et al.
(författare)
-
Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in endometrial cancer-Results from two randomised studies.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - : Elsevier. - 0959-8049 .- 1879-0852. ; 46:13, s. 2422-2431
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Endometrial cancer patients with high grade tumours, deep myometrial invasion or advanced stage disease have a poor prognosis. Randomised studies have demonstrated the prevention of loco-regional relapses with radiotherapy (RT) with no effect on overall survival (OS). The possible additive effect of chemotherapy (CT) remains unclear. Two randomised clinical trials (NSGO-EC-9501/EORTC-55991 and MaNGO ILIADE-III) were undertaken to clarify if sequential combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) in high-risk endometrial cancer. The two studies were pooled. METHODS: Patients (n=540; 534 evaluable) with operated endometrial cancer International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (FIGO) stage I-III with no residual tumour and prognostic factors implying high-risk were randomly allocated to adjuvant radiotherapy with or without sequential chemotherapy. RESULTS: In the NSGO/EORTC study, the combined modality treatment was associated with 36% reduction in the risk for relapse or death (hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.99; P=0.04); two-sided tests were used. The result from the Gynaecologic Oncology group at the Mario Negri Institute (MaNGO)-study pointed in the same direction (HR 0.61), but was not significant. In the combined analysis, the estimate of risk for relapse or death was similar but with narrower confidence limits (HR 0.63, CI 0.44-0.89; P=0.009). Neither study showed significant differences in the overall survival. In the combined analysis, overall survival approached statistical significance (HR 0.69, CI 0.46-1.03; P=0.07) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was significant (HR 0.55, CI 0.35-0.88; P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to radiation improves progression-free survival in operated endometrial cancer patients with no residual tumour and a high-risk profile. A remaining question for future studies is if addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy improves the results.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sorbe, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
External Pelvic and Vaginal Irradiation Versus Vaginal Irradiation Alone as Postoperative Therapy in Medium-risk Endometrial Carcinoma-A Prospective Randomized Study.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. - : Elsevier BV. - 0360-3016 .- 1879-355X. ; 82:3, s. 1249-1255
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of adjuvant external beam pelvic radiotherapy as adjunct to vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) in medium-risk endometrial carcinoma, with regard to locoregional tumor control, recurrences, survival, and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive series of 527 evaluable patients were included in this randomized trial. Median follow-up for patients alive was 62 months. The primary study endpoints were locoregional recurrences and overall survival. Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival, recurrence-free interval, cancer-specific survival, and toxicity. RESULTS: Five-year locoregional relapse rates were 1.5% after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) plus VBT and 5% after vaginal irradiation alone (p = 0.013), and 5-year overall survival rates were 89% and 90%, respectively (p = 0.548). Endometrial cancer-related death rates were 3.8% after EBRT plus VBT and 6.8% after VBT (p = 0.118). Pelvic recurrences (exclusively vaginal recurrence) were reduced by 93% by the addition of EBRT to VBT. Deep myometrial infiltration was a significant prognostic factor in this medium-risk group of endometrioid carcinomas but not International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade or DNA ploidy. Combined radiotherapy was well tolerated, with serious (Grade 3) late side effects of less than 2%. However, there was a significant difference in favor of VBT alone. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant locoregional control benefit with combined radiotherapy, no survival improvement was recorded, but increased late toxicity was noted in the intestine, bladder, and vagina. Combined RT should probably be reserved for high-risk cases with two or more high-risk factors. VBT alone should be the adjuvant treatment option for purely medium-risk cases.
|
|
| 3. |
- Sorbe, Bengt Göran, et al.
(författare)
-
External Pelvic and Vaginal Irradiation Versus Vaginal Irradiation Alone as Postoperative Therapy in Medium-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma A Prospective, Randomized Study-Quality-of-Life Analysis
- 2012
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. - Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 1048-891X .- 1525-1438. ; 22:7, s. 1281-1288
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: A combination of vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy was compared with brachytherapy alone in medium-risk endometrial carcinomas. Quality-of-life analysis is an important part of a randomized study to find out the optimal adjuvant treatment for this group of patients. Objective: To evaluate the value of adjuvant external beam pelvic radiotherapy in adjunct to vaginal brachytherapy in medium-risk endometrial carcinoma. Quality-of-life evaluation is the main topic of this report. Methods: A consecutive series of 527 evaluable patients were included in this randomized trial. Median follow-up for patients alive was 62 months. The primary study end points were locoregional recurrences and overall survival. Secondary end points were recurrence-free survival, toxicity, and quality-of-life. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28 modules were used to evaluate global health status, functional scales, and symptom scales. Results: Five-year locoregional relapse rates were 1.5% after external beam (ERT) plus vaginal irradiation (VBT) and 5% after vaginal irradiation alone (P = 0.013), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89% and 90%, respectively. External beam radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of adverse effects from the intestine and the bladder, and quality-of-life parameters deteriorated at the end of radiotherapy but recovered to normal levels within a few months. There was a significant difference in favor of VBT alone with regard to adverse effects of the bowel and urinary tract, and quality-of-life. Conclusions: Despite a significant locoregional control benefit with combined radiotherapy, no survival improvement was recorded; but increased late toxicity from the intestine and the bladder. External beam irradiation decreased global health status during and after treatment, and 3 functional scale items (physical, role, and social). Six of 11 symptom items showed a pattern favoring vaginal brachytherapy alone.
|
|
