SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Bonfiglio G) srt2:(2020-2023)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Bonfiglio G) > (2020-2023)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 14
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Eijsbouts, C., et al. (författare)
  • Genome-wide analysis of 53,400 people with irritable bowel syndrome highlights shared genetic pathways with mood and anxiety disorders
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: Nature Genetics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1061-4036 .- 1546-1718. ; 53:11, s. 1543-1552
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) results from disordered brain–gut interactions. Identifying susceptibility genes could highlight the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. We designed a digestive health questionnaire for UK Biobank and combined identified cases with IBS with independent cohorts. We conducted a genome-wide association study with 53,400 cases and 433,201 controls and replicated significant associations in a 23andMe panel (205,252 cases and 1,384,055 controls). Our study identified and confirmed six genetic susceptibility loci for IBS. Implicated genes included NCAM1, CADM2, PHF2/FAM120A, DOCK9, CKAP2/TPTE2P3 and BAG6. The first four are associated with mood and anxiety disorders, expressed in the nervous system, or both. Mirroring this, we also found strong genome-wide correlation between the risk of IBS and anxiety, neuroticism and depression (rg > 0.5). Additional analyses suggested this arises due to shared pathogenic pathways rather than, for example, anxiety causing abdominal symptoms. Implicated mechanisms require further exploration to help understand the altered brain–gut interactions underlying IBS. © 2021, The Author(s).
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  • Ebersole, Charles R., et al. (författare)
  • Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability
  • 2020
  • Ingår i: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. - : Sage. - 2515-2467 .- 2515-2459. ; 3:3, s. 309-331
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p < .05). Commenters suggested that lack of adherence to expert review and low-powered tests were the reasons that most of these RP:P studies failed to replicate the original effects. We revised the replication protocols and received formal peer review prior to conducting new replication studies. We administered the RP:P and revised protocols in multiple laboratories (median number of laboratories per original study = 6.5, range = 3-9; median total sample = 1,279.5, range = 276-3,512) for high-powered tests of each original finding with both protocols. Overall, following the preregistered analysis plan, we found that the revised protocols produced effect sizes similar to those of the RP:P protocols (Delta r = .002 or .014, depending on analytic approach). The median effect size for the revised protocols (r = .05) was similar to that of the RP:P protocols (r = .04) and the original RP:P replications (r = .11), and smaller than that of the original studies (r = .37). Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes (median r = .07, range = .00-.15) were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes (median r = .37, range = .19-.50).
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  • Mansouri, L, et al. (författare)
  • Different prognostic impact of recurrent gene mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia depending on IGHV gene somatic hypermutation status: a study by ERIC in HARMONY
  • 2023
  • Ingår i: Leukemia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1476-5551 .- 0887-6924. ; 37:2, s. 339-347
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Recent evidence suggests that the prognostic impact of gene mutations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may differ depending on the immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV) gene somatic hypermutation (SHM) status. In this study, we assessed the impact of nine recurrently mutated genes (BIRC3, EGR2, MYD88, NFKBIE, NOTCH1, POT1, SF3B1, TP53, and XPO1) in pre-treatment samples from 4580 patients with CLL, using time-to-first-treatment (TTFT) as the primary end-point in relation to IGHV gene SHM status. Mutations were detected in 1588 (34.7%) patients at frequencies ranging from 2.3–9.8% with mutations in NOTCH1 being the most frequent. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, mutations in all genes except MYD88 were associated with a significantly shorter TTFT. In multivariate analysis of Binet stage A patients, performed separately for IGHV-mutated (M-CLL) and unmutated CLL (U-CLL), a different spectrum of gene alterations independently predicted short TTFT within the two subgroups. While SF3B1 and XPO1 mutations were independent prognostic variables in both U-CLL and M-CLL, TP53, BIRC3 and EGR2 aberrations were significant predictors only in U-CLL, and NOTCH1 and NFKBIE only in M-CLL. Our findings underscore the need for a compartmentalized approach to identify high-risk patients, particularly among M-CLL patients, with potential implications for stratified management.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 14
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (11)
forskningsöversikt (2)
konferensbidrag (1)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (11)
övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt (3)
Författare/redaktör
Ghia, P (6)
Scarfo, L (6)
Bonfiglio, S (6)
Rosenquist, R. (5)
Rossi, D (5)
Pospisilova, S (5)
visa fler...
Stamatopoulos, K (5)
Parker, H. (5)
Sutton, LA (5)
Niemann, CU (5)
Strefford, JC (5)
Martinez Lopez, J. (5)
Brieghel, C (5)
Laidou, S (5)
Baran-Marszak, F (5)
Gupta, R. (4)
Delgado, J. (4)
Campo, E (4)
Mansouri, L. (4)
Ongena, J (4)
Davis, Z (4)
Catherwood, M. (4)
Gaidano, G. (4)
Oscier, D. (4)
Smedby, KE (4)
Mills, K (4)
Fesus, V (4)
Matrai, Z (4)
Zenz, T (4)
Mattsson, M. (4)
Puiggros, A. (4)
Nguyen-Khac, F. (4)
Kotaskova, J. (4)
Baliakas, P (4)
Espinet, B. (4)
de la Serna, J. (4)
Bosch, F. (4)
Moia, R (4)
Calasanz, MJ (4)
Larrayoz, MJ (4)
Bullinger, L (4)
Karakatsoulis, G (4)
Miras, F (4)
Cuneo, A (4)
Nadeu, F (4)
Hernandez-Sanchez, M (4)
Benito, R (4)
Thornton, P. (4)
Rodriguez-Vicente, A ... (4)
Meggendorfer, M (4)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Karolinska Institutet (10)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (3)
Uppsala universitet (3)
Chalmers tekniska högskola (3)
Göteborgs universitet (1)
Umeå universitet (1)
visa fler...
Örebro universitet (1)
Linköpings universitet (1)
Lunds universitet (1)
Handelshögskolan i Stockholm (1)
visa färre...
Språk
Engelska (14)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (4)
Naturvetenskap (3)
Teknik (3)
Samhällsvetenskap (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy