SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Booij Ronald) srt2:(2023)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Booij Ronald) > (2023)

  • Resultat 1-3 av 3
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Booij, Ronald, et al. (författare)
  • Assessment of visibility of bone structures in the wrist using normal and half of the radiation dose with photon-counting detector CT
  • 2023
  • Ingår i: European Journal of Radiology. - : ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD. - 0720-048X .- 1872-7727. ; 159
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Purpose: To quantitatively and qualitatively assess the visibility of bone structures in the wrist on photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) images compared to state-of-the-art energy-integrating de-tector CT (EID-CT).Method: Four human cadaveric wrist specimens were scanned with EID-CT and PCD-CT at identical CTDIvolof 12.2 mGy and with 6.1 mGy (half dose PCD-CT). Axial images were reconstructed using the thinnest possible slice thickness, i.e. 0.4 mm on EID-CT and 0.2 mm on PCD-CT, with the largest image matrix size possible using reconstruction kernels optimized for bone (EID-CT: Ur68, PCD-CT: Br92). Quantitative evaluation was performed to determine contrast-noise ratio (CNR) of bone/ fat, cortical and trabecular sharpness. An observer study using visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis was performed by six observers to assess the visibility of nutrient canals, trabecular architecture, cortical bone and the general image quality.Results: At equal dose, images obtained with PCD-CT had 39 +/- 6 % lower CNR (p = 0.001), 71 +/- 57 % higher trabecular sharpness in the radius (p = 0.02) and 42 +/- 8 % (p < 0.05) sharper cortical edges than those obtained with EID-CT. This was confirmed by VGC analysis showing a superior visibility of nutrient canals, trabeculae and cortical bone area under the curve (AUC) > 0.89) for PCD-CT, even at half dose.Conclusions: Despite a lower CNR and increased noise, the trabecular and cortical sharpness were twofold higher with PCD-CT. Visual grading analysis demonstrated superior visibility of cortical bone, trabeculae, nutrient canals and an overall improved image quality with PCD-CT over EID-CT. At half dose, PCD-CT also yielded superior image quality, both in quantitative measures and as evaluated by radiologists.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  • Woisetschläger, Mischa, et al. (författare)
  • Improved visualization of the bone-implant interface and osseointegration in ex vivo acetabular cup implants using photon-counting detector CT
  • 2023
  • Ingår i: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL. - : SPRINGERNATURE. - 2509-9280. ; 7:1
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BackgroundSuccessful osseointegration of joint replacement implants is required for long-term implant survival. Accurate assessment of osseointegration could enable clinical discrimination of failed implants from other sources of pain avoiding unnecessary surgeries. Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) provides improvements in image resolution compared to conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), possibly allowing better visualization of bone-implant-interfaces and osseointegration. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of visualization of bone-implant-interfaces and osseointegration in acetabular cup implants, using PCD-CT compared with EID-CT.MethodsTwo acetabular implants (one cemented, one uncemented) retrieved during revision surgery were scanned using PCD-CT and EID-CT at equal radiation dose. Images were reconstructed using different reconstruction kernels and iterative strengths. Delineation of the bone-implant and bone-cement-interface as an indicator of osseointegration was scored subjectively for image quality by four radiologists on a Likert scale and assessed quantitatively.ResultsDelineation of bone-implant and bone-cement-interfaces was better with PCD-CT compared with EID-CT (p <= 0.030). The highest ratings were given for PCD-CT at sharper kernels for the cemented cup (PCD-CT, median 5, interquartile range 4.25-5.00 versus EID-CT, 3, 2.00-3.75, p < 0.001) and the uncemented cup (5, 4.00-5.00 versus 2, 2-2, respectively, p < 0.001). The bone-implant-interface was 35-42% sharper and the bone-cement-interface was 28-43% sharper with PCD-CT compared with EID-CT, depending on the reconstruction kernel.ConclusionsPCD-CT might enable a more accurate assessment of osseointegration of orthopedic joint replacement implants.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-3 av 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy