| 1. |
- Abel, Edvard, 1970, et al.
(författare)
-
Fatigue in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Association With Radiation Dose to the Cerebellum
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Advances in Radiation Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 2452-1094. ; 7:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Although fatigue is a known side effect in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving radiation therapy, knowledge regarding long-term fatigue and dose-response relationships to organs at risk is scarce. The aim of this prospective study was to analyze patient-reported fatigue in patients with HNC receiving radiation therapy and to explore any possible association with organ-at-risk doses. Methods and Materials: Patients with HNC referred for curative radiation therapy were eligible for inclusion in the study. To assess patient-reported fatigue, quality of life questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-FA12) were distributed before treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after the start of treatment. Mean dose (Dmean) and near maximum dose (D2%) of the cerebellum and brain stem were evaluated in relation to baseline-adjusted fatigue scores at 3 months. Results: One hundred twenty-six patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy between 2008 and 2010 were available for final analysis. Female sex and age <60 years were associated with higher fatigue at baseline, whereas patients also treated with chemotherapy had reduced physical and emotional fatigue at 6 months. Physical fatigue (QLQ-FA12 scale) increased from baseline up to 3 months (29 vs 59; P < .0001) but showed no difference compared with baseline from 1 to 5 years. Emotional fatigue was significantly lower at 5 years compared with baseline (14 vs 28; P < .0001). Patients with cerebellum Dmean > 3.5 Gy had higher mean physical fatigue scores at 3 months (38 vs 27; P = .036). Conclusions: Although there is a significant increase in fatigue scores for patients with HNC up to 1 year after radiation therapy, this study showed a return to baseline levels at 5 years. A possible association was found between physical fatigue and a higher mean dose to the cerebellum.
|
|
| 2. |
- Gram, Daniel, et al.
(författare)
-
The risk of radiation-induced neurocognitive impairment and the impact of sparing the hippocampus during pediatric proton cranial irradiation
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - 0284-186X. ; 62:2, s. 134-140
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and purpose: Hippocampus is a central component for neurocognitive function and memory. We investigated the predicted risk of neurocognitive impairment of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and the deliverability and effects of hippocampal sparing. The risk estimates were derived from published NTCP models. Specifically, we leveraged the estimated benefit of reduced neurocognitive impairment with the risk of reduced tumor control. Material and methods: For this dose planning study, a total of 504 hippocampal sparing intensity modulated proton therapy (HS-IMPT) plans were generated for 24 pediatric patients whom had previously received CSI. Plans were evaluated with respect to target coverage and homogeneity index to target volumes, maximum and mean dose to OARs. Paired t-tests were used to compare hippocampal mean doses and normal tissue complication probability estimates. Results: The median mean dose to the hippocampus could be reduced from 31.3 GyRBE to 7.3 GyRBE (p <.001), though 20% of these plans were not considered clinically acceptable as they failed one or more acceptance criterion. Reducing the median mean hippocampus dose to 10.6 GyRBE was possible with all plans considered as clinically acceptable treatment plans. By sparing the hippocampus to the lowest dose level, the risk estimation of neurocognitive impairment could be reduced from 89.6%, 62.1% and 51.1% to 41.0% (p <.001), 20.1% (p <.001) and 29.9% (p <.001) for task efficiency, organization and memory, respectively. Estimated tumor control probability was not adversely affected by HS-IMPT, ranging from 78.5 to 80.5% for all plans. Conclusions: We present estimates of potential clinical benefit in terms of neurocognitive impairment and demonstrate the possibility of considerably reducing neurocognitive adverse effects, minimally compromising target coverage locally using HS-IMPT.
|
|
