| 1. |
- Bergenzaun, Lill, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessing left ventricular systolic function in shock : evaluation of echocardiographic parameters in intensive care
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Critical Care. - : BioMed Central. - 1364-8535 .- 1466-609X. ; 15:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Assessing left ventricular (LV) systolic function in a rapid and reliable way can be challenging in the critically ill patient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of, as well as the association between, commonly used LV systolic parameters, by using serial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). METHODS: Fifty patients with shock and mechanical ventilation were included. TTE examinations were performed daily for a total of 7 days. Methods used to assess LV systolic function were visually estimated, "eyeball" ejection fraction (EBEF), the Simpson single-plane method, mean atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPDm), septal tissue velocity imaging (TDIs), and velocity time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract (VTI). RESULTS: EBEF, AVPDm, TDIs, VTI, and the Simpson were obtained in 100%, 100%, 99%, 95% and 93%, respectively, of all possible examinations. The correlations between the Simpson and EBEF showed r values for all 7 days ranging from 0.79 to 0.95 (P < 0.01). the Simpson correlations with the other LV parameters showed substantial variation over time, with the poorest results seen for TDIs and AVPDm. The repeatability was best for VTI (interobserver coefficient of variation (CV) 4.8%, and intraobserver CV, 3.1%), and AVPDm (5.3% and 4.4%, respectively), and worst for the Simpson method (8.2% and 10.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: EBEF and AVPDm provided the best, and Simpson, the worst feasibility when assessing LV systolic function in a population of mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically unstable patients. Additionally, the Simpson showed the poorest repeatability. We suggest that EBEF can be used instead of single-plane Simpson when assessing LV ejection fraction in this category of patients. TDIs and AVPDm, as markers of longitudinal function of the LV, are not interchangeable with LV ejection fraction.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bergenzaun, Lill, et al.
(författare)
-
High-sensitive cardiac Troponin T is superior to echocardiography in predicting 1-year mortality in patients with SIRS and shock in intensive care.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: BMC Anesthesiology. - : BioMed Central. - 1471-2253 .- 1471-2253. ; 12:25
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is well documented in the critically ill. We assessed 1-year mortality in relation to cardiac biomarkers and LV function parameters by echocardiography in patients with shock. METHODS: A prospective, observational, cohort study of 49 patients. B-natriuretic peptide (BNP), highsensitive troponin T (hsTNT) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were assessed within 12 h of study inclusion. LV systolic function was measured by ejection fraction (LVEF), mean atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPDm), peak systolic tissue Doppler velocity imaging (TDIs) and velocity time integral in the LV outflow tract (LVOT VTI). LV diastolic function was evaluated by transmitral pulsed Doppler (E, A, E/A, E-deceleration time), tissue Doppler indices (e, a, E/e) and left atrial volume (La volume). APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) and SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scores were calculated. RESULTS: hsTNT was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (60 [17.0-99.5] vs 168 [89.8-358] ng/l, p = 0.003). Other univariate predictors of mortality were APACHE II (p = 0.009), E/e (p = 0.023), SOFA (p = 0.024) and age (p = 0.031). Survivors and nonsurvivors did not differ regarding BNP (p = 0.26) or any LV systolic function parameter (LVEF p = 0.87, AVPDm p = 0.087, TDIs p = 0.93, LVOT VTI p = 0.18). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified hsTNT (p = 0.010) as the only independent predictor of 1-year mortality; adjusted odds ratio 2.0 (95% CI 1.2- 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: hsTNT was the only independent predictor of 1-year mortality in patients with shock. Neither BNP nor echocardiographic parameters had an independent prognostic value. Further studies are needed to establish the clinical significance of elevated hsTNT in patients in shock.
|
|
| 3. |
- Chew, Michelle, et al.
(författare)
-
Extravascular lung water index: Diagnostic accuracy and relation to lung injury and mortality in patients with shock
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Intensive Care Medicine. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0342-4642 .- 1432-1238. ; 37:1 Suppl, s. 98-98
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION. The diagnosis of acute lung injury may be more robust if more accurate physiological markers can be identified. Extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) may be useful and has been shown to correlate with respiratory function and mortality in patients with sepsis and ARDS. Whether this applies to a wider population, and which index performs best, are unclear. OBJECTIVES. We hypothesized that EVLWI correlates with respiratory function and mortality in patients with documented systemic inflammation and shock. We investigated EVLW indexed to actual and predicted body weight, and pulmonary blood volume. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of EVLWI for lung injury. METHODS. In 51 patients with shock and SIRS, EVLWI was measured within 6 h of ICU admission and indexed to actual weight (EVLWI/ABW), predicted body weight (EVLWI/ PBW) and pulmonary blood volume (EVLWI/PBV). Relationships to lung injury and ICUmortality were investigated. Positive and negative likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test odds and ROC curves were calculated. RESULTS. EVLWI was higher among patients with lung injury and was significantly correlated with respiratory parameters. EVLWI/ABW was higher among non-survivors and gave the best positive likelihood ratios for diagnosing ALI/ARDS. In contrast, EVLWI/PBV gave better diagnostic value for severe lung injury according to Murray's LIS criteria. The post-test odds for ALI and ARDS increased threefold when using EVLWI/ABW as a bedside test. The post-test odds of severe lung injury increased eightfold using EVLWI/PBV. EVLWI/ABW and EVLWI/PBV generated the best ROC curves for mortality prediction with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 63-72%. CONCLUSIONS. EVLWI was associated with degree of lung injury, regardless of the index used, supporting its usefulness as a bedside indicator for disease severity. EVLWI/PBV and EVLW/ABW gave the best diagnostic accuracies for the diagnosis of lung injury, and generated the bestROCcurves for mortality prediction.EVLWI/ABWwas significantly increased in non-survivors. Further studies are needed to confirm the additional value of EVLWI for the early identification of lung injury.
|
|
| 4. |
- Chew, Michelle, et al.
(författare)
-
Extravascular lung water index improves the diagnostic accuracy of lung injury in patients with shock
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Critical Care. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1364-8535. ; 16:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: The diagnosis of acute lung injury (ALI) may be more robust if more accurate physiological markers can be identified. Extravascular lung water (EVLW) is one possible marker, and it has been shown to correlate with respiratory function and mortality in patients with sepsis. Whether EVLW confers diagnostic value in a general population with shock, as well as which index performs best, is unclear. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of various EVLW indices in patients with shock. Methods: We studied a prospective, observational cohort of 51 patients with shock admitted to a tertiary ICU. EVLW was measured within 6 hours of ICU admission and indexed to actual body weight (EVLW/ABW), predicted body weight (EVLW/PBW) and pulmonary blood volume (EVLW/PBV). The relationship of these indices to the diagnosis and severity of lung injury and ICU mortality were studied. Positive and negative likelihood ratios, pre- and posttest odds for diagnosis of lung injury and mortality were calculated. Results: All EVLW indices were higher among patients with lung injury and significantly correlated with respiratory parameters. Furthermore, all EVLW indices were significantly higher in nonsurvivors. The use of EVLW improves the posttest OR for the diagnosis of ALI, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe lung injury (sLI) by up to eightfold. Combining increased EVLW and a diagnosis of ALI, ARDS or sLI increases the posttest odds of ICU mortality. EVLW/ABW and EVLW/PBV demonstrated the best diagnostic performance in this population. Conclusions: EVLW was associated with degree of lung injury and mortality, regardless of the index used, confirming that it may be used as a bedside indicator of disease severity. The use of EVLW as a bedside test conferred added diagnostic value for the identification of patients with lung injury.
|
|
