| 1. |
- D'Oria, Mario, et al.
(författare)
-
The Association Between Body Mass Index and Death Following Elective Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Vascular Quality Initiative
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 66:1, s. 27-36
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The effect of body mass index (BMI) on post-operative outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair remains poorly defined. The association between BMI and death following elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open aneurysm repair (OAR) of AAA in a large national quality registry is investigated.Methods: All elective AAA repairs within the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI; 2010 to September 2021) were reviewed (EVAR, n = 53 426; OAR, n = 9 479). All analyses were conducted separately for EVAR and OAR patients. The primary end points were 30 day mortality and five year survival rates. Study cohorts were divided into World Health Organisation BMI categories (C1 < 18.5, C2 18.5 <= BMI < 25, C3 25 <= BMI < 30, C4, 30 <= BMI < 35, C5 35 <= BMI < 40, C6 >= 40). BMI was examined as both a categorical and continuous variable. Logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for risk adjustment.Results: Among EVAR patients, BMI distribution was C1, 1 216 (2%); C2, 14 687 (28%); C3, 20 516 (38%); C4, 11 352 (21%); C5, 3 947 (7%); C6, 1 708 (3%). Class 1, 2, and 6 BMI patients experienced an increased 30 daymortality rate (C1 2.6%; C2 1.3%; C6 1.4% vs. C3 - 5 0.7%; p < .001) and C1 and C2 had correspondingly inferior long termsurvival (five years: C1 69 +/- 3%; C2 79 +/- 1% vs. C3 - 6 86 - 88 +/- 2%; log rank p <.001). These survival disparities persisted after risk adjustment formultiple confounders. In the OAR cohort, BMI distribution was C1, 280 (3%); C2, 2 862 (30%); C3, 3 587 (38%); C4, 1 940 (21%); C5, 581 (6%); C6, 229 (2%). Crude 30 day mortality rates were increased for both the lowest and highest BMI patients (C1 12%, C6 7% vs. C2 - 5 3 - 4%; p < .001); these differences also persisted in long term survival (five years: C1 71 +/- 6%, C6 82 +/- 6% vs. C2 - 6 85 - 88 +/- 3%; log rank p <.001). In risk adjusted analysis, both low and high BMI OAR patients had an increased 30 day and long term mortality rate.Conclusion: Within the VQI, both the extreme low (< 18.5) and high (>= 40) BMI groups experienced an increased 30 day mortality rate after both elective EVAR and OAR. By comparison, while the lowest BMI cohort was significantly associated with decreased long term survival after both procedures, the highest BMI group only experienced reduced long termsurvival after OAR. Based upon this large real world registry analysis of elective AAA repairs, differential metabolic signatures exist within extreme BMI categories, which may inform peri-operative risk stratification and clinical decision making.
|
|
| 2. |
- Grandi, Alessandro, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk Prediction Models for Peri-Operative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery with Particular Focus on Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms : A Scoping Review
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Medicine. - : MDPI. - 2077-0383. ; 12:17
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose. The present scoping review aims to describe and analyze available clinical data on the most commonly reported risk prediction indices in vascular surgery for perioperative mortality, with a particular focus on ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Materials and Methods. A scoping review following the PRISMA Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews was performed. Available full-text studies published in English in PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases (last queried, 30 March 2023) were systematically reviewed and analyzed. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework used to construct the search strings was the following: in patients with aortic pathologies, in particular rAAA (population), undergoing open or endovascular surgery (intervention), what different risk prediction models exist (comparison), and how well do they predict post-operative mortality (outcomes)? Results. The literature search and screening of all relevant abstracts revealed a total of 56 studies in the final qualitative synthesis. The main findings of the scoping review, grouped by the risk score that was investigated in the original studies, were synthetized without performing any formal meta-analysis. A total of nine risk scores for major vascular surgery or elective AAA, and 10 scores focusing on rAAA, were identified. Whilst there were several validation studies suggesting that most risk scores performed adequately in the setting of rAAA, none reached 100% accuracy. The Glasgow aneurysm score, ERAS and Vancouver score risk scores were more frequently included in validation studies and were more often used in secondary studies. Unfortunately, the published literature presents a heterogenicity of results in the validation studies comparing the different risk scores. To date, no risk score has been endorsed by any of the vascular surgery societies. Conclusions. The use of risk scores in any complex surgery can have multiple advantages, especially when dealing with emergent cases, since they can inform perioperative decision making, patient and family discussions, and post hoc case-mix adjustments. Although a variety of different rAAA risk prediction tools have been published to date, none are superior to others based on this review. The heterogeneity of the variables used in the different scores impairs comparative analysis which represents a major limitation to understanding which risk score may be the "best" in contemporary practice. Future developments in artificial intelligence may further assist surgical decision making in predicting post-operative adverse events.
|
|
