| 1. |
- Benson, Lisa, et al.
(författare)
-
Equity and Inclusion in Peer Reviewing : Grand Challenges for Engineering Education Researchers
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Proceedings. - : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- This workshop aims to help individuals write constructive and insightful reviews for scholarly work in engineering education research while considering aspects of diversity, equity and inclusion in the work. The topic, goal and activities of this workshop align with the conference theme of "Grand Challenges in Engineering Education"as it will help participants identify and overcome the challenges involved with equitable and inclusive peer review practices in engineering education research.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bernhard, Jonte, et al.
(författare)
-
FACE TO FACE AGAIN : REPORT FROM THE DOCTORAL SYMPOSIUM IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH AT SEFI 2022
- 2022
-
Ingår i: SEFI 2022. - : European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). ; , s. 2340-2356
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The 6th Doctoral Symposium at SEFI 2022 attracted 20 doctoral students and 17 senior researchers. After two years as an online event during the pandemic, it was organised as a fully in-person event. In preparation, the doctoral students wrote extended abstracts to introduce themselves and their PhD projects, while the seniorsprovided reading recommendations and advice. The intense, full-day program was based on group discussions and interactive plenary sessions. The Doctoral Symposium was concluded by a session in which each participant presented their take-home message. This paper outlines how the Doctoral Symposium was organised and summarizes some of the documentation.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bernhard, Jonte, 1953-, et al.
(författare)
-
Lessons learned in the doctoral symposium in engineering education research at SEFI 2020
- 2020
-
Ingår i: SEFI 48th Annual Conference Engaging Engineering Education, Proceedings. - Enschede, NL : European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). - 9782873520205 ; , s. 1464-1476
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The 4th Doctoral Symposium at SEFI 2020 attracted 21 doctoral students and 17 senior researchers. For the first time, it was organised as a fully online event. In preparation, the doctoral students wrote extended abstracts to introduce themselves and their PhD projects, while the seniors provided reading tips and advice. The intense, full-day program was based on group discussions and interactive plenary sessions. The Doctoral Symposium was concluded by a session in which each participant presented their take-home message. This paper outlines how the Doctoral Symposium was organised and summarizes some of the documentation.
|
|
| 4. |
- Bernhard, J., et al.
(författare)
-
The doctoral symposium in engineering education research at SEFI 2023
- 2023
-
Ingår i: SEFI 2023 - 51st Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education: Engineering Education for Sustainability, Proceedings. - : European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). ; , s. 50-65
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The 7th SEFI Doctoral Symposium in Engineering Education Research, held at the campus of Technological University Dublin on Sunday, September 10th, preceded the SEFI 2023 Annual Conference. In all, 37 Ph.D. researchers attended, which is a record number for this event. They came to share and further probe their Ph.D. research topics and plans of study and to strengthen and extend their professional networks. During this full and intense day, 27 established scholars provided the Ph.D. researchers with personal feedback and ideas regarding their research. The highlight, according to the Ph.D. student participants, was the warm and enthusiastic reception they received from the well-established seniors of the global engineering education research community. Although SEFI is a European organization, the Ph.D. researchers and senior advisers who attended travelled to Ireland for this event from Africa, Australia, and South and North America, and from all over Europe.
|
|
| 5. |
- Björn, Camilla, et al.
(författare)
-
Engineering students reflect on work-life relevant learning
- 2023
-
Ingår i: SEFI 2023 - 51st Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education: Engineering Education for Sustainability, Proceedings. - : European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). ; , s. 203-211
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- As engineering education is a professional education, it should prepare students for working life. However, there are obvious limitations to the amount of content that is possible to cover and the authenticity of the learning environments. In this study, we investigate the students' awareness and perception of these limitations by answering the following two research questions: What competencies do the students view as work-life relevant? How do students reflect on their opportunities to learn these competencies? The context of the study is the five-year Master of Science in Engineering and Computer Science at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Throughout the programme, the students attend a programme-integrated course with four reflection seminars including written assignments each year. In their fourth year they wrote reflections on their perceived work-life readiness and 38 of these reflections were analysed thematically in this study. We find that students expressed an elaborate view of what constitutes work-life relevant competencies. They readily identify learning experiences in the programme where they have developed such competencies, for instance through projects. They also show an understanding that there are limitations in the ability of the university environment to achieve fully authentic learning experiences. Many students see it as their own responsibility and necessity to complement their education with other opportunities for work-life relevant learning, such as hobby projects or internships. Others seem relaxed about any gap they may have in their work-life preparation and expect to learn on their first job.
|
|
| 6. |
- Björn, Camilla, et al.
(författare)
-
The Nature of Progression Between Yearly Project Courses
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 19th International CDIO Conference. - Norway : NTNU SEED. ; , s. 692-704
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study focuses on the progression between courses in a programme, meaning that thelearning experiences build upon and reinforce the previous ones. The idea of mutuallysupporting courses is a cornerstone of the integrated curriculum, and hence of the CDIOapproach. However, despite much use of the term, there is a lack of work to conceptualiseprogression. The aim of this paper is, accordingly, to provide a richer theoreticalconceptualisation of progression and to apply this in analysing the implementation in aprogramme. In this case, we focus specifically on the progression through a series of coursesbased on authentic engineering projects. Such courses, called Design-implementExperiences, are a prominent feature of the CDIO framework; Standard 5 recommends at leasttwo project courses with progression through the curriculum. The context for the study is the5-year Electrical Engineering programme at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. It contains aseries of yearly project courses starting in the first year and ending with the master thesisproject. The purpose is to support students to synthesise and consolidate their learning inprevious and parallel subject courses, and to develop professional engineering skills. Here,the progression between the three first project courses is described with detailed elaborationof three themes: communication, project planning and management, and ethics. The questionsguiding our investigation are: What is the nature of progression across these project courses?In particular, along what dimensions is progression planned, and how is that implemented inthe course design?
|
|
| 7. |
- Brink, Suzanne, et al.
(författare)
-
Curriculum agility as optional CDIO standard
- 2023
-
Ingår i: 19th CDIO International Conference, CDIO 2023 - Proceedings. - : Chalmers University of Technology. - 2002-1593. - 9788230361863 ; , s. 18-28
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The concept of Curriculum Agility has been co-created in a series of sessions at CDIO meetings and conferences since 2018. Deliverables were a jointly generated definition, characteristics, a set of principles, and a self-mapping process on these principles. Using the Curriculum Agility concept offers guidance for CDIO programs and institutions in increasing the adaptability of their curricula based on the latest insights and developments in their discipline, continuously fulfilling the need of an ever more diverse student population and anticipating sudden societal changes. Curriculum Agility takes a holistic approach to considering conditions for proactive and timely curriculum development, including but not limited to enhancement of faculty competence. Although the success of CDIO implementation depends on this wider set of conditions that can drive, enable, or hinder change, this is currently not addressed in the CDIO standards. This paper proposes Curriculum Agility as an optional standard in the CDIO framework. It is a widely applicable, program-level concept including both educational and organisational aspects that addresses an important need in engineering education, and it is co-created within the CDIO community. Curriculum Agility is currently not sufficiently present or addressed in the existing standards. Therefore, this paper argues that Curriculum Agility as an optional standard and rubric will be a new useful tool in the CDIO toolbox.
|
|
| 8. |
- Broadbent, R., et al.
(författare)
-
Engineering education research : writing for publication (workshop)
- 2023
-
Ingår i: SEFI 2023 - 51st Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education: Engineering Education for Sustainability, Proceedings. - : European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). ; , s. 3107-3112
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this interactive workshop, facilitated by a team of editors from the European Journal of Engineering Education (EJEE), the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE), and IEEE Transactions on Education, participants had the opportunity to network with other scholars in the field, and learn about the journal publication process and how best to navigate it. It served as an informal opportunity for scholars at all stages of their publication journey to share their experiences, both positive and negative, directly with each other and journal editors. Participants co-created a document of shared insights about writing for publication, the key outcomes of which are presented in this paper.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Edström, Kristina, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Engineering education research : reviewing journal manuscripts fairly, constructively, effectively
- 2023
-
Ingår i: SEFI 2023 - 51st Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education: Engineering Education for Sustainability, Proceedings. - : European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). ; , s. 3144-3151
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Peer review is the mechanism for quality control in academic journals. When a manuscript is submitted to a journal, the editors invite other researchers - peers - to review it anonymously. The reviews should serve to support the journal editors in making decisions, and to support the authors in improving the manuscripts before publication. Therefore, reviews need to be fair and constructive. As reviewing can also take considerable effort, it is useful for the reviewer to consider how to do it effectively. Given the important role of peer review in a field, and the considerable effort it takes, it is valuable to jointly consider all these aspects of reviewing in a dialogue with reviewers, authors and editors. This paper presents the outcomes of such a dialogue with 49 participants in the field of engineering education research.
|
|
