| 1. |
- Andersson, Tommy, 1970-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patients with atrial fibrillation and outcomes of cerebral infarction in those with treatment of warfarin versus no warfarin with references to CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score, age and sex - A Swedish nationwide observational study with 48 433 patients
- 2017
-
Ingår i: PLoS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 12:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims There is controversy in the guidelines as to whether patients with atrial fibrillation and a low risk of stroke should be treated with anticoagulation, especially those with a CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score of 1 point. In a retrospective, nationwide cohort study, we used the Swedish National Patient Registry, the National Prescribed Drugs Registry, the Swedish Registry of Education and the Population and Housing Census Registry. 48 433 patients were identified between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008 with incident atrial fibrillation who were divided in age categories, sex and a CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score of 0, 1, 2 and >= 3 and they were included in a time-varying analysis of warfarin treatment versus no treatment. The primary end-point was cerebral infarction and stroke, and patients were followed until 31 December 2009. Patients with 1 point from the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score showed the following adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval: men 65-74 years 0.46 (0.25-0.83), men < 65 years 1.11 (0.56-2.23) and women < 65 years 2.13 (0.94-4.82), where HR < 1 indicates protection with warfarin. In patients < 65 years and 2 points, HR in men was 0.35 (0.18-0.69) and in women 1.84 (0.86-3.94) while, in women with at least 3 points, HR was 0.31 (0.16-0.59). In patients 65-74 years and 2 points, HR in men was 0.37 (0.23-0.59) and in women 0.39 ( 0.21-0.73). Categories including age >= 65 years or >= 3 points showed a statistically significant protection from warfarin. Our results support that treatment with anticoagulation may be considered in all patients with an incident atrial fibrillation diagnosis and an age of 65 years and older, i.e. also when the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score is 1.
|
|
| 2. |
- Andersson, Tommy, 1970-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patients without comorbidities at the time of diagnosis of atrial fibrillation : causes of death during long-term follow-up compared to matched controls
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Clinical Cardiology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0160-9289 .- 1932-8737. ; 40:11, s. 1076-1082
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term, cause-specific mortality risk in patients without comorbidities at the time of diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF).METHODS: From a nation-wide registry of patients hospitalized with incident AF between 1995 and 2008 we identified 9 519 patients with a first diagnosed AF and no comorbidities at the time of AF diagnosis. They were matched with 12 468 controls. The follow-up continued until December 2008. Causes of death were classified according to the ICD-10 codes.RESULTS: During follow-up, 11.1% of patients with AF and 8.3% of controls died. Cardiovascular diseases were the most common causes of death and the only diagnoses which showed significantly higher relative risk in patients with AF than controls (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.8-2.3), and the relative risk was significantly higher in women than in men. Stroke was a more common cause among patients with AF, 13.1% versus 9.7% (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.0), while cerebral hemorrhage was more common among controls, 4.7% versus 10.2% (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.5). The time from AF diagnosis to death was 6.0 ± 3.1 years.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with incident AF and no known comorbidities at the time of AF diagnosis, only cardiovascular diseases were more often causes of death as compared to controls. Women carried a significantly higher relative risk than men.
|
|
| 3. |
- Björkenheim, Anna, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessment of Atrial Fibrillation–Specific Symptoms Before and 2 Years After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation : Do Patients and Physicians Differ in Their Perception of Symptom Relief?
- 2017
-
Ingår i: JACC. - : Elsevier. - 2405-500X .- 2405-5018. ; 3:10, s. 1168-1176
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported and physician-assessed atrial fibrillation (AF)–related symptoms after AF ablation.Background: Success of AF ablation is usually defined as freedom from AF, although symptom relief is often patients’ desire.Methods: Symptom relief was assessed as perceived by patients using the short, validated, AF-specific symptom questionnaire AF6 and as classified by physicians using the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) classification at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months after AF ablation. Recurrence of arrhythmia was documented by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.Results: In total, 54 patients completed the 24-month follow-up. All 6 items on the AF6, AF6 sum score, and EHRA class improved significantly over time. The greatest improvement was seen during the first 6 months after ablation, but AF6 scores showed continued improvement up to 12 months, in contrast to EHRA class. There was a low correlation between AF6 score and EHRA class, but the predictive ability was low. Both AF6 scores and EHRA class were significantly correlated with AF burden at all times after ablation. A change of >9 points in AF6 sum score corresponded to a meaningful reduction in symptom severity.Conclusion: Patient-reported and physician-assessed outcomes were both useful in assessing symptom relief after AF ablation, although patient-reported outcomes were more sensitive tools. There was also a discrepancy between patient-reported and physician-assessed outcomes after ablation. Freedom from AF and a low AF burden most often resulted in a reduction of symptoms, but symptom relief also occurred despite little effect on the arrhythmia.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Björkenheim, Anna, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient-reported outcomes in relation to continuously monitored rhythm before and during 2 years after atrial fibrillation ablation using a disease-specific and a generic instrument
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American Heart Association. - : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.. - 2047-9980. ; 7:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background--Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation improves patient-reported outcomes, irrespective of mode of intermittent rhythm monitoring. We evaluated the use of an AF-specific and a generic patient-reported outcomes instrument during continuous rhythm monitoring 2 years after AF ablation. Methods and Results--Fifty-four patients completed the generic 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and the AF-specific AF6 questionnaires before and 6, 12, and 24 months after AF ablation. All patients underwent continuous ECG monitoring via an implantable loop recorder. The generic patient-reported outcomes scores were compared with those of a Swedish age- and sexmatched population. After ablation, both summary scores reached normative levels at 24 months, while role-physical and vitality remained lower than norms. Responders to ablation (AF burden < 0.5%) reached the norms in all individual 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey domains, while nonresponders (AF burden > 0.5%) reached norms only in social functioning and mental component summary. All AF6 items and the sum score showed moderate to large improvement in both responders and nonresponders, although responders showed significantly greater improvement in all items except item 1 from before to 24 months after ablation. Higher AF burden was independently associated with poorer physical component summary and AF6 sum score. Conclusions--The AF-specific AF6 questionnaire was more sensitive to changes related to AF burden than the generic 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Patients improved as documented by both instruments, but a higher AF burden after ablation was associated with poorer AF-specific patient-reported outcomes and poorer generic physical but not mental health. Our results support the use of an AF-specific instrument, alone or in combination with a generic instrument, to assess the effect of ablation. © 2018 The Authors.
|
|
| 6. |
- Björkenheim, Anna, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient-reported Outcomes In Relation To Continuously Monitored Rhythm Before And During Two Years After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using A Disease-specific And A Generic Instrument
- 2018
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Patients with AF have a lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than the general population.Objective: To assess the effect of AF ablation on AF-specific and generic patient-reported outcomes (PRO), compare it to a Swedish age- and sex-matched population and evaluate any association with the AF burden.Methods: Patients scheduled for AF ablation completed the generic SF-36 and the AF-specific PRO questionnaires before and six, 12 and 24 months after AF ablation. All patients underwent continuous ECG monitoring via an implantable loop recorder.Results: 54 patients completed the follow-up. After ablation, the generic SF-36 improved and both summary scores reached normative levels at 24 months, while physical functioning, role-physical and vitality remained lower than norms. Responders with an AF burden ≤0.5% at each visit after ablation reached the norms in all domains, while non-responders reached norms in only social functioning and MCS. All AF6 items and the sum score showed moderate to large improvement in both responders and non-responders. Higher AF burden was independently associated with poorer PCS and AF6 sum score. The AF sum score correlated with all SF-36 domains, but all AF6 items did not correlate with the SF-36 summary scores.Conclusion: The AF-specific AF6 questionnaire was more sensitive to changes in PRO related to AF burden than was the generic SF-36. Higher AF burden after ablation was associated with poorer AF-specific PRO and poorer generic physical but not mental health. Focusing on AF-specific symptoms and their impact on quality of life as an outcome after AF ablation is reasonable, as improving PROs is the main goal of AF ablation.
|
|
| 7. |
- Björkenheim, Anna, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient-reported outcomes in relation to continuously monitored rhythm before and during two years after atrial fibrillation ablation using a disease-specific and a generic instrument
- 2018
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation improves patient-reported outcomes (PROs), irrespective of mode of intermittent rhythm monitoring.Purpose: To evaluate the use of an AF-specific and a generic PRO instrument during continuous rhythm monitoring two years after AF ablation.Methods: Fifty-four patients completed the generic SF-36 and the AF-specific AF6 questionnaires before and six, 12 and 24 months after AF ablation. All patients underwent continuous ECG monitoring via an implantable loop recorder. The generic PRO scores were compared to those of a Swedish age- and sex-matched population.Results: After ablation both summary scores reached normative levels at 24 months, while physical functioning, role-physical and vitality remained lower than norms. Responders to ablation (AF burden <0.5%) reached the norms in all individual SF-36 domains, while non-responders (AF burden >0.5%) reached norms only in social functioning. All AF6 items and the sum score showed moderate to large improvement in both responders and non-responders, although responders had significantly lower scores 24 months after ablation. Higher AF burden was independently associated with poorer PCS and AF6 sum score.Conclusions: The AF-specific AF6 questionnaire was more sensitive to changes related to AF burden than the generic SF-36. Patients improved as documented by both instruments, but a higher AF burden after ablation was associated with poorer AF-specific PROs and poorer generic physical but not mental health. Our results support the use of an AF-specific instrument, alone or in combination with a generic instrument, to assess the effect of ablation.
|
|
| 8. |
- Björkenheim, Anna, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Rhythm Control and its Relation to Symptoms During the First Two Years After Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. - Hoboken, USA : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.. - 0147-8389 .- 1540-8159. ; 39:9, s. 914-925
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To evaluate rhythm control up to two years after AF ablation and its relation to reported symptoms.Background: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) continuously records the ECG, has an automatic AF detection algorithm and a possibility for patients to activate an ECG recording during symptoms.Methods: Fifty-seven patients (mean age 57±9 years, 60% male, 88% paroxysmal AF) underwent AF ablation following ILR implantation. Device data were downloaded at the ablation and three, six, 12, 18 and 24 months after ablation.Results: Fifty-four patients completed the two-year follow-up. Thirteen (24%) patients had no AF episodes detected by ILR during follow-up. Ten of 41 patients (24%) with AF recurrence were only detected by ILR and AF recurrences were detected earlier by ILR (P<0.001). The median AF burden in patients with AF recurrence was 5.7% (IQR 0.4-14.4) and was even lower in patients with AF only detected by ILR (P = 0.001). Forty-eight % of the patients indicated symptoms via the patient activator but 33% of those recordings were not due to AF. Early AF recurrence (within 3 months) was highly associated with later AF recurrence (P<0.001). AF burden >0.5% and longest >6h before the ablation were independent predictors of AF recurrence during intermittent but not continuous monitoring.Conclusions: After AF ablation, the AF burden was low throughout the 24 months follow-up. Nevertheless, symptoms were commonly indicated but one third of patient activated recordings did not show AF. Continuous monitoring was superior to intermittent follow-up in detecting AF episodes and assessing the AF burden.Clinical trial registration: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00697359.
|
|
| 9. |
- Coyne, Karin S, et al.
(författare)
-
Development and Validation of the AFImpact: An Atrial Fibrillation-Specific Measure of Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. - : Elsevier BV. - 1524-4733. ; 20:10, s. 1355-1361
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Improvement in health-related quality of life is a key therapeutic goal of disease management in atrial fibrillation (AF).To describe the development of the AFImpact, an AF-specific health-related quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measure.Development and validation of the AFImpact comprised a qualitative stage, consisting of a literature review and concept elicitation interviews (91 patients with AF), item generation, and cognitive debriefing (30 patients with AF), and a quantitative stage, consisting of evaluation of the instrument's psychometric properties (313 patients with AF). Preliminary responsiveness to change was assessed in 118 patients undergoing cardioversion.On the basis of the literature review and concept elicitation interviews, 75 items were generated. Factor analyses guided a reduction to 18 items. Three domains were confirmed: vitality (7 items), emotional distress (8 items), and sleep (3 items). The 18-item AFImpact demonstrated high item convergent and discriminant validity. Cronbach α coefficients showed high internal consistency reliability. Test-retest reliability of individual items in stable patients (n = 33) was satisfactory, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.61 to 0.86. All three AFImpact domain scores differentiated patients who reported different levels of overall health, thereby supporting known-groups validity. Scores for each item improved after cardioversion, with effect sizes ranging from -0.19 to -0.65.Psychometric evaluations support the reliability and validity of the AFImpact as a patient-reported outcome instrument to measure the impact of AF, with preliminary results in patients undergoing cardioversion supporting responsiveness to change.
|
|
| 10. |
- E, Sandgren, et al.
(författare)
-
Role of baseline 12‑lead ECG in predicting syncope caused by arrhythmia in patients investigated using an implantable loop recorder.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature. - : Elsevier BV. - 2352-9067. ; 24
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To evaluate the role of baseline 12‑lead ECG in predicting the syncope mechanism during continuous monitoring using an implantable loop recorder (ILR).Consecutive patients with syncope implanted with an ILR were enrolled. Baseline 12‑lead ECG were related to ECG diagnosis derived from ILR tracings recorded at the time of syncope recurrence.In total 300 patients with a mean age of 66±16years were included, 49% (146/300) received an ILR-guided diagnosis during follow-up. Patients with abnormal baseline ECG more frequently received an ILR-guided diagnosis compared to those with normal baseline ECG 59% vs. 44%, p=0.018. For a diagnosis of arrhythmic syncope, the corresponding frequencies were 45% vs. 26%, p=0.001.Patients with bifascicular block significantly more common received an ILR-guided diagnosis 76% (25/33) compared to those with normal baseline ECG 44% (90/205), p≪0.001. In this subgroup, 96% (24/25) were diagnosed with arrhythmic syncope, 23 of which were due to bradyarrhythmia. Bifascicular block occurred almost exclusively among those ≥60years (31/33). After logistic regression the adjusted OR for arrhythmic syncope was significant for bifascicular block 5.5 (95%CI 2.3-13.2), p≪0.001. PPV for bifascicular block in predicting arrhythmic syncope was 73% and NPV 73%.A baseline 12‑lead ECG with bifascicular block was a strong predictor for syncope during follow-up, most often due to bradyarrhythmia caused by intermittent complete heart block. No other ECG findings were associated with the ILR outcome. We find it reasonable to consider permanent pacing instead of an ILR for patients with bifascicular block and unexplained syncope.
|
|
