| 1. |
- Evans, Juliet, et al.
(författare)
-
Depot- and ethnic-specific differences in the relationship between adipose tissue inflammation and insulin sensitivity
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Clinical Endocrinology. - : Wiley. - 0300-0664 .- 1365-2265. ; 74:1, s. 51-59
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective It is unclear whether there are differences in inflammatory gene expression between abdominal and gluteal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and between black and white women. We therefore tested the hypotheses that SAT inflammatory gene expression is greater in the abdominal compared to the gluteal depot, and SAT inflammatory gene expression is associated with differential insulin sensitivity (S(I) ) in black and white women. Design and methods S(I) (frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test) and abdominal SAT and gluteal SAT gene expression levels of 13 inflammatory genes were measured in normal-weight (BMI 18-25 kg/m(2) ) and obese (BMI >30 kg/m(2) ) black (n = 30) and white (n = 26) South African women. Results Black women had higher abdominal and gluteal SAT expression of CCL2, CD68, TNF-α and CSF-1 compared to white women (P < 0·01). Multivariate analysis showed that inflammatory gene expression in the white women explained 56·8% of the variance in S(I) (P < 0·005), compared to 20·9% in black women (P = 0·30). Gluteal SAT had lower expression of adiponectin, but higher expression of inflammatory cytokines, macrophage markers and leptin than abdominal SAT depots (P < 0·05). Conclusions Black South African women had higher inflammatory gene expression levels than white women; however, the relationship between AT inflammation and S(I) was stronger in white compared to black women. Further research is required to explore other factors affecting S(I) in black populations. Contrary to our original hypothesis, gluteal SAT had a greater inflammatory gene expression profile than abdominal SAT depots. The protective nature of gluteo-femoral fat therefore requires further investigation.
|
|
| 2. |
- Evans, Juliet, et al.
(författare)
-
Diagnostic ability of obesity measures to identify metabolic risk factors in south african women
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders. - New York : Mary Ann Liebert. - 1540-4196 .- 1557-8518. ; 9:5, s. 353-360
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Currently, guidelines for obesity thresholds relating to metabolic risk in South African women have not been established. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the level and diagnostic ability of obesity measures [waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area] to identify black and white South African women with elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance. Methods: Blood pressure, fasting insulin, glucose, and lipids were measured in 241 black and 188 white South African women. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic ability of WC, WHtR, and computer tomography (CT)-derived VAT to identify subjects above metabolic risk thresholds. The Youden index was used to calculate obesity thresholds for metabolic risk variables. Results: WC, WHtR, and VAT were significant determinants of all metabolic risk variables (P < 0.05), and differences in the ROC area under the curve (AUC) between obesity measures were small (approximate to 0.08) for all metabolic risk variables, in both ethnic groups. However, the ROC AUC vales for all obesity measures were greater in white compared to black women (P < 0.01). WC and VAT thresholds were lower in black women compared to white women, whereas WHtR thresholds varied less between ethnicities. Conclusions: Due to the cost, access, and radiation exposure, CT-derived VAT is not recommended above the use of simple anthropometric measures (WC and WHtR) for the determination of metabolic risk. Furthermore, thresholds of WHtR, due to low variability between ethnicities, may be more useful than WC for ethnic comparisons of risk.
|
|
| 3. |
- Goedecke, Julia H, et al.
(författare)
-
Reduced gluteal expression of adipogenic and lipogenic genes in black south african women is associated with obesity-related insulin resistance
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. - Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0021-972X .- 1945-7197. ; 96:12, s. E2029-E2033
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Context: Black South African women are less insulin sensitive than their White counterparts, despite less central and greater peripheral fat deposition. We hypothesized that this paradox may be explained, in part, by differences in the adipogenic capacity of sc adipose tissue (SAT). Objective: Our objective was to measure adipogenic and lipogenic gene expression in abdominal and gluteal SAT depots and determine their relationships with insulin sensitivity (S(I)) in South African women. Participants and Design: Fourteen normal-weight [body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m(2)] Black, 13 normal-weight White, 14 obese (BMI >30 kg/m(2)) Black, and 13 obese White premenopausal South African women participated in this cross-sectional study.Main outcomes:S(I) (frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test) in relation to expression of adipogenic and lipogenic genes in abdominal and gluteal SAT depots. Results: With increasing BMI, Black women had less visceral fat (P = 0.03) and more abdominal (P = 0.017) and gynoid (P = 0.041) SAT but had lower S(I) (P < 0.01) than White women. The expression of adipogenic and lipogenic genes was proportionately lower with obesity in Black but not White women in the gluteal and deep SAT depots (P < 0.05 for ethnicity × BMI effect). In Black women only, the expression of these genes correlated positively with S(I) (all P < 0.05), independently of age and fat mass. Conclusions: Obese Black women have reduced SAT expression of adipogenic and lipogenic genes compared with White women, which associates with reduced S(I). These findings suggest that obesity in Black women impairs SAT adipogenesis and storage, potentially leading to insulin resistance and increased risk of type 2 diabetes.
|
|
