| 1. |
- Björn, Niclas, et al.
(författare)
-
The association of four genetic variants with myelosuppression in gemcitabine-treated Japanese is not evident in gemcitabine/carboplatin-treated Swedes
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1742-7835 .- 1742-7843. ; 130:4, s. 513-521
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Gemcitabine/carboplatin-induced myelosuppressive adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are clinical problems leading to patient suffering and dose alterations. There is a need for personalised medicine to improve treatment effects and patients' well-being. We tested four genetic variants, rs11141915, rs1901440, rs12046844 and rs11719165, previously suggested as potential biomarkers for gemcitabine-induced leukopenia/neutropenia in Japanese patients, in 213 Swedish gemcitabine/carboplatin-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. DNA was genotyped using TaqMan probes and real-time PCR. The relationships between the risk alleles and low toxicity (non-ADR: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grades 0) or high toxicity (ADR: CTCAE grades 3-4) of platelets, leukocytes and neutrophils were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. The risk alleles did not correlate with myelosuppression, and the strongest borderline significance (not withstanding adjustment for multiple testing) was for rs1901440 (neutropenia, p = 0.043) and rs11719165 (leukopenia, p = 0.049) where the risk alleles trended towards lower toxicity, contrasting with previous study findings. Risk alleles and higher risk scores were more common among our patients. We conclude that the genetic variants do not apply to Swedish patients treated with gemcitabine/carboplatin. However, they can still be important in other populations and cohorts, especially in a gemcitabine monotherapy setting, where the causal genetic variation might influence myelosuppressive ADRs.
|
|
| 2. |
- Jakobsen Falk, Ingrid, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Early changes in gene expression profiles in AML patients during induction chemotherapy
- 2022
-
Ingår i: BMC Genomics. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 1471-2164. ; 23:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Elucidation of the genetic mechanisms underlying treatment response to standard induction chemotherapy in AML patients is warranted, in order to aid in risk-adapted treatment decisions as novel treatments are emerging. In this pilot study, we explored the treatment-induced expression patterns in a small cohort of AML patients by analyzing differential gene expression (DGE) over the first 2 days of induction chemotherapy.METHODS: Blood samples were collected from ten AML patients at baseline (before treatment initiation) and during the first 2 days of treatment (Day 1; approximately 24 h, and Day 2; approximately 48 h after treatment initiation, respectively) and RNA was extracted for subsequent RNA sequencing. DGE between time points were assessed by pairwise analysis using the R package edgeR version 3.18.1 in all patients as well as in relation to treatment response (complete remission, CR, vs non-complete remission, nCR). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Qiagen) software was used for pathway analysis and visualization.RESULTS: After initial data quality control, two patients were excluded from further analysis, resulting in a final cohort of eight patients with data from all three timepoints. DGE analysis demonstrated activation of pathways with genes directly or indirectly associated with NF-κB signaling. Significant activation of the NF-κB pathway was seen in 50% of the patients 2 days after treatment start, while iNOS pathway effects could be identified already after 1 day. nCR patients displayed activation of pathways associated with cell cycle progression, oncogenesis and anti-apoptotic behavior, including the STAT3 pathway and Salvage pathways of pyrimidine ribonucleotides. Notably, a significant induction of cytidine deaminase, an enzyme responsible for the deamination of Ara-C, could be observed between baseline and Day 2 in the nCR patients but not in patients achieving CR.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we show that time-course analysis of gene expression represents a feasible approach to identify relevant pathways affected by standard induction chemotherapy in AML patients. This poses as a potential method for elucidating new drug targets and biomarkers for categorizing disease aggressiveness and evaluating treatment response. However, more studies on larger cohorts are warranted to elucidate the transcriptional basis for drug response.
|
|
| 3. |
- Malmström, Annika, 1957-, et al.
(författare)
-
ABCB1 single-nucleotide variants and survival in patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy concomitant with temozolomide
- 2020
-
Ingår i: The Pharmacogenomics Journal. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 1470-269X .- 1473-1150. ; 20:2, s. 213-219
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Standard treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) patients is surgery and radiochemotherapy (RCT) with temozolomide (TMZ). TMZ is a substrate for ABCB1, a transmembrane drug transporter. It has been suggested that survival for GBM patients receiving TMZ is influenced by different single-nucleotide variants (SNV) of ABCB1. We therefore examined SNV:s of ABCB1, namely 1199Gamp;gt;A, 1236Camp;gt;T, 2677Gamp;gt;T/A, and 3435Camp;gt;T and correlated to survival for GBM patients receiving RCT. In a pilot cohort (97 patients) a significant correlation to survival was found for SNV 1199Gamp;gt;A, with median OS for variant G/G patients being 18.2 months versus 11.5 months for A/G (p = 0.012). We found no correlation to survival for the other SNV:s. We then expanded the cohort to 179 patients (expanded cohort) and also included a confirmatory cohort (49 patients) focusing on SNV 1199Gamp;gt;A. Median OS for G/G versus A/G plus A/A was 15.7 and 11.5 months, respectively (p = 0.085) for the expanded cohort and 13.8 versus 16.8 months (p = 0.19) for the confirmatory. In conclusion, in patients with GBM receiving RCT with TMZ, no correlation with survival was found for the SNV:s 1236Camp;gt;T, 2677Gamp;gt;T/A, and 3435Camp;gt;T of ABCB1. Although the SNV 1199Gamp;gt;A might have some impact, a clinically significant role could not be confirmed.
|
|
