| 1. |
- Hernes, Eivor, et al.
(författare)
-
High prostate cancer mortality in Norway evaluated by automated classification of medical entities.
- 2008
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer Prevention. - 0959-8278 .- 1473-5709. ; 17:4, s. 331-335
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The new standard of cause of death classification is an automated selection of the underlying cause of death using the international software Automated Classification of Medical Entities (ACME). Norwegian mortality rates are, however, based on manual classification of deaths. The aim of this study was to investigate how the use of ACME would influence Norwegian prostate cancer mortality rates. A previously described cohort of Norwegian prostate cancer patients deceased during 1996 was applied. Multiple causes of death data based on information from death certificates, autopsies and queries was coded according to ACME specifications, thereby ACME selected the underlying cause of death. In addition, the underlying cause of death that originally was manually classified for the official mortality statistics was retrieved from Statistics Norway in all cases. Age-standardized prostate cancer mortality rates (world population) per 100,000 person-years were calculated. A total of 2012 cases were included. On the basis of ACME classification, the age-standardized prostate cancer mortality rate in Norway for 1996 would have been 24.4 (95% confidence interval: 22.9-26.0) as compared with the rate based on manual classification for the official mortality statistics of 24.9 (95% confidence interval: 23.4-26.5). Thus, automated classification by ACME does not significantly influence the age-adjusted Norwegian prostate cancer mortality rate for the year 1996. There is reason to assume that the use of manual classification of deaths is not a major explanation of the high prostate cancer mortality rates in Norway.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kvåle, Rune, et al.
(författare)
-
Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens : a population-based study
- 2009
-
Ingår i: BJU International. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 103:12, s. 1647-1654
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To study the concordance between the Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens in a population-based registry, to clarify whether the concordance depends on the annual number of RP specimens assessed in the pathology unit, and to identify preoperative clinical factors that predict upgrading from a Gleason score of or=7 in the RP specimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Through the Cancer Registry of Norway, we identified 1116 patients with available Gleason scores from biopsy and RP specimens. Concordance was evaluated using the kappa coefficient, and predictors of concordance were assessed in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The Gleason scores were identical in biopsy and RP specimens in 591 of the 1116 (53%) patients. The biopsy-based Gleason score more often under-graded (38%) than over-graded (9%) the RP-based Gleason score. Pathology units that examined >40 RP specimens annually had a higher concordance between the Gleason score in the biopsy and RP specimen than did lower-volume units. The rate of upgrading from a Gleason score of or=7 in the RP specimen increased with increasing preoperative prostate-specific antigen serum levels, and with increasing intervals between biopsy and RP. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance in Gleason score between biopsy and RP was highest among the pathology departments that regularly evaluated RP specimens. Careful consideration of clinical factors and biopsy grading might improve the identification of patients considered as suitable for active surveillance.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
