| 1. |
- Boman, Caroline, et al.
(författare)
-
Discordance of PD-L1 status between primary and metastatic breast cancer : A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Cancer Treatment Reviews. - : Elsevier. - 0305-7372 .- 1532-1967. ; 99
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is predictive for benefit from immunotherapy in several human malignancies including triple negative breast cancer. Lower positivity rates but a larger relative benefit from atezolizumab has been implied when PD-L1 status is assessed at metastatic sites. We aimed to study the discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and metastasis in breast cancer due to its potential clinical utility.METHODS: Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline and Web of science were searched for studies reporting on PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer, followed by data extraction. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 positivity rates in tumor cells, immune cells or both in primary tumor and metastasis, PD-L1 discordance between matched primary tumors and metastasis and direction of discordance.RESULTS: Of 2552 identified entries following de-duplication, 20 studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. Pooled PD-L1 positivity rate was higher in primary tumors compared to metastasis when assessed in immune cells (51.2% vs 37.1% p < 0.001) and tumor/immune cells (30.1% vs 14.6% p < 0.001), but not in tumor cells (18.7% vs 17.8% p = 0.65). PD-L1 positivity was lowest when assessed in bone metastases (12%) and highest in lymph nodes (60%). Discordance between primary tumors and metastasis was bidirectional, with higher pooled discordance rates when PD-L1 expression was assessed in immune compared to tumor cells (39.5% vs 13.6%, p < 0.001).CONCLUSION: The observed considerable discordance between PD-L1 status in primary and metastatic breast cancer emphasizes the importance of appropriate tissue sampling when selecting patients for immunotherapy.
|
|
| 2. |
- Chen, Xinsong, et al.
(författare)
-
Breast cancer patient-derived whole-tumor cell culture model for efficient drug profiling and treatment response prediction
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. - : Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. - 0027-8424 .- 1091-6490. ; 120:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Breast cancer (BC) is a complex disease comprising multiple distinct subtypes with different genetic features and pathological characteristics. Although a large number of antineoplastic compounds have been approved for clinical use, patient-to-patient variability in drug response is frequently observed, highlighting the need for efficient treatment prediction for individualized therapy. Several patient-derived models have been established lately for the prediction of drug response. However, each of these models has its limitations that impede their clinical application. Here, we report that the whole-tumor cell culture (WTC) ex vivo model could be stably established from all breast tumors with a high success rate (98 out of 116), and it could reassemble the parental tumors with the endogenous microenvironment. We observed strong clinical associations and predictive values from the investigation of a broad range of BC therapies with WTCs derived from a patient cohort. The accuracy was further supported by the correlation between WTC-based test results and patients' clinical responses in a separate validation study, where the neoadjuvant treatment regimens of 15 BC patients were mimicked. Collectively, the WTC model allows us to accomplish personalized drug testing within 10 d, even for small-sized tumors, highlighting its potential for individualized BC therapy. Furthermore, coupled with genomic and transcriptomic analyses, WTC-based testing can also help to stratify specific patient groups for assignment into appropriate clinical trials, as well as validate potential biomarkers during drug development.
|
|
| 3. |
- Ellegård, Sander, 1985-
(författare)
-
HER2-positive breast cancer : Clinical and molecular aspects
- 2024
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- BackgroundHuman Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is notable for its aggressive behavior, however with the introduction of trastuzumab in the early 2000’s, prognosis has improved. This thesis investigates the efficacy of trastuzumab in real-world settings after its introduction and evaluates the prognostic value of molecular biomarkers, aiming to optimize treatment approaches and improve patient outcomes.Material and MethodsHER2-positive patients treated in the advanced and early stages of breast cancer were retrospectively identified using Swedish patient registries and through the review of medical records.Study I included 46 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with trastuzumab between 2000 and 2007. Immunohistochemical analysis of several proteins hypothesized to be involved in trastuzumab resistance were evaluated. Additionally, gene copy number variations were analyzed using droplet digital PCR.Study II include 599 patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab between 2006 and 2014 in the Southeastern health care region, in order to evaluate the implementation of trastuzumab after its approval and to evaluate patient outcomes with regard to clinicopathological variables.Study III conducted quantitative analyses of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in patients with available tumor material from the same cohort identified in study II. Additionally, a case-control study of 21 cases with 21 matched controls treated with trastuzumab were analyzed with RNA-sequencing in order to identify important differentially expressed genes.ResultsStudy I demonstrated that trastuzumab treatment in a real-world setting had similar survival as in pivotal clinical trials. Additionally, high amplification of HER2 correlated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced breast cancer patients and PTPN2 gain was correlated with reduced PFS and OS.Study II confirmed trastuzumab's efficacy in a large real-world cohort. Trastuzumab treatment, estrogen receptor (ER) status and number of metastatic lymph nodes were the most important prognostic factors for breast cancer-specific survival and distant recurrence-free survival.Study III identified a significant association between high levels of sTILs and improved overall survival. Additionally, several G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) involved in EGFR and Wnt signaling were found to be upregulated in cases vs controls.ConclusionsTrastuzumab maintains its efficacy in clinical practice, affirming its role in current treatment regimens for HER2-positive breast cancer. The findings support the prognostic significance of sTILs and suggest HER2-amplification levels as a relevant prognostic factor. We propose PTPN2 and several GPCRs as areas for future research.
|
|
| 4. |
- Eriksson, Mikael, et al.
(författare)
-
Benefit of pazopanib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours: results from a phase II trial (SSG XXI, PAGIST)
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ESMO Open. - : Elsevier BV. - 2059-7029. ; 6:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) resistant to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and sunitinib may be treated with regorafenib, which resulted in a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.8 months in the GRID trial. Also, pazopanib, another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (PAZOGIST) in the third line, which showed a PFS of 45.2% 4 months after study entry, but patients intolerant to sunitinib were also included. We designed another trial evaluating pazopanib, enrolling only patients with progression on both imatinib and sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since all eligible patients had progressive disease, we preferred a non-randomized, phase II multicentre trial so that all patients could receive a potentially active drug. Patients had a progressive metastatic or locally advanced GIST and were ≥18 years of age, with a performance status of 0-2, and sufficient organ functions. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (defined as complete remission + partial remission + stable disease) at 12 weeks on pazopanib. A Simon's two-stage analysis was used with an interim analysis 12 weeks after enrollment of the first 22 patients, and if passed, there was a full enrolment of 72 patients. GIST mutational analysis was done, and most patients had pazopanib plasma concentration measured after 12 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled. The disease control rate after 12 weeks was 44%, and the median PFS was 19.6 weeks (95% confidence interval 12.6-23.4 weeks). Pazopanib-related toxicity was moderate and manageable. No statistically significant differences were found related to mutations. Plasma concentrations of pazopanib had a formal but weak correlation with outcome. CONCLUSION: Pazopanib given in the third line to patients with GIST progressing on both imatinib and sunitinib was beneficial for about half of the patients. The PAGIST trial confirms the results from the PAZOGIST trial, and the median PFS achieved seems comparable to the PFS achieved with regorafenib in the third-line setting.
|
|
| 5. |
- Hatschek, Thomas, et al.
(författare)
-
Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Docetaxel vs Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: JAMA Oncology. - : American Medical Association. - 2374-2437 .- 2374-2445. ; 7:9, s. 1360-1367
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- IMPORTANCE: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is presently approved for treatment of advanced breast cancer and after incomplete response to neoadjuvant therapy, but the potential of T-DM1 as monotherapy is so far unknown.OBJECTIVE: To assess pathologic complete response (pCR) to standard neoadjuvant therapy of combination docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (DTP) vs T-DM1 monotherapy in patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized phase 2 trial, conducted at 9 sites in Sweden, enrolled 202 patients between December 1, 2014, and October 31, 2018. Participants were 18 years or older, with ERBB2-positive tumors larger than 20 mm and/or verified lymph node metastases. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of DTP (standard group) or T-DM1 (investigational group). Crossover was recommended at lack of response or occurrence of intolerable toxic effects. Assessment with fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed at baseline and after 2 and 6 treatment cycles.MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Pathologic complete response, defined as ypT0 or Tis ypN0. Secondary end points were clinical and radiologic objective response; event-free survival, invasive disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival; safety; health-related quality of life (HRQoL); functional and biological tumor characteristics; and frequency of breast-conserving surgery.RESULTS: Overall, 202 patients were randomized; 197 (99 women in the standard group [median age, 51 years (range, 26-73 years)] and 98 women in the investigational group [median age, 53 years (range, 28-74 years)]) were evaluable for the primary end point. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 45 patients in the standard group (45.5%; 95% CI 35.4%-55.8%) and 43 patients in the investigational group (43.9%; 95% CI 33.9%-54.3%). The difference was not statistically significant (P = .82). In a subgroup analysis, the pCR rate was higher in hormone receptor-negative tumors than in hormone receptor-positive tumors in both treatment groups (45 of 72 [62.5%] vs 45 of 125 [36.0%]). Three patients in the T-DM1 group experienced progression during therapy. In an exploratory analysis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at 10% or more (median) estimated pCR significantly (odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.42-5.36; P = .003). Response evaluation with F-18-FDG PET-CT revealed a relative decrease of maximum standardized uptake value by more than 31.3% (median) was associated with pCR (odds ratio, 6.67, 95% CI, 2.38-20.00; P < .001).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, treatment with standard neoadjuvant combination DTP was equal to T-DM1.
|
|
| 6. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Axillary Staging in the Setting of a Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Cancer In Situ (DCIS) : Results of an International Expert Panel and a Critical Guideline Performance Using Frequentist and Bayesian Analysis
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer. - 1068-9265 .- 1534-4681. ; 27:Suppl. 2, s. S337-S338
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background/Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is not routine in DCIS. Guidelines suggest SLNB when there is high risk for underlying invasion (large size, high grade, symptomatic lesion) or for detection failure (e.g., after mastectomy). However, guidelines and current practice patterns are inconsistent. Moreover, whilst SLNB is thought to be feasible and accurate after wide local excision (WLE), there is less consensus to support its use after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS), which can reduce the need for mastectomy (Mx) and is gradually adopted as standard of care. The study aim was to assess if guidelines or individualized assessment result in optimal selection of patients for upfront SLNB.Methods: A panel of 28 international experts (20 surgeons, 8 oncologists, Europe 20, USA 5, Asia/Australia 3) was formed, all blind to the identity of the others. They reviewed anonymized patient cases from the SentiNot study (n=184, m. age 60 years, DCIS m. size 4 cm, Grade 2/3= 36%/64%, mass lesions 13,4%, underlying invasion 24.5%) and answer if they would consider upfront SLNB and why. Consensus and majority were set to >75 and >50%. At the same time, 6 independent raters (4 surgeons, 2 oncologists) reviewed guidelines and assessed the same patient cases per each guideline. Accuracy in relation to underlying invasion was assessed by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC) was reported. Agreement was investigated by kappa statistics and decision-making patterns by logistic multivariate regression and cluster analysis. To allow for flexibility and adaptation to current knowledge, both a frequentist and a Bayesian approach were undertaken. Priors were adjusted after a literature review regarding the factors that are commonly thought to be associated with higher risk for underlying invasion.Results: A total of 44,896 decisions were retrieved and analysed. The panel reached consensus/majority for upfront SLNB in 41.3/61.4%, whereas individual rates ranged from 11 to 100%. Agreement among panelists was low (kappa=0.37). In multivariate regression analysis for the entire panel, type of surgery was the most common determinant, (simple WLE=less, OPBCS=more and Mx=constant for SLNB), followed by symptomatic diagnosis and DCIS size. Most (26) members had a clear decision-making pattern regarding SLND, based mainly on DCIS size and type of surgery. Individual decision-making performed modestly in identifying patients with underlying invasion (AUC range 0,47-0,59), resulting mainly in overtreatment in 44-77% of patients. The panel performed similarly by majority (AUC 0,5) and by consensus (AUC 0,55) but “undertreated” 60-75% of patients with invasion, failing to identify them as "high-risk." After the recognition of different decision-making patterns, panelists were divided in subgroups with similar decision-making pattern. Analysis identified subgroups with difference in SLNB rate but not with better AUC. The disagreement among panelists in the same subgroups was significant, not only regarding which patients should undergo SLNB, but also on what factors that recommendation was based on. Eight guidelines with relevant recommendations were identified [USA (ASCO/NCCN), Europe (ESMO), Sweden, Denmark, UK, Netherlands and Italy, retrieval date May 2019]. Agreement among raters for each guideline separately varied (kappa: 0.23-0.9). Interpretation as to whether SLNB should be performed ranged widely (40-90%) and with varying concordance (32-88%). No guideline demonstrated accuracy (AUC range 0.45-0.55). Overtreatment risk was high (50-90%), whereas 10-50% of patients with invasion were not identified as “high- risk.” Agreement across guidelines was low (kappa=0.24), meaning that different patients had similar risk to be treated inaccurately, regardless of which guideline was examined.Conclusions: Individualized decision-making and guideline interpretation may be highly subjective and with low accuracy in terms of prediction of invasive disease, resulting in almost random risk for over- or undertreatment of the axilla in patients with DCIS. This suggests that current views and guidelines should be challenged. More accurate preoperative workup and novel techniques to allow for delayed SLNB may be of value in this setting.
|
|
| 7. |
- Matikas, Alexios, et al.
(författare)
-
PD-1 protein and gene expression as prognostic factors in early breast cancer
- 2020
-
Ingår i: ESMO Open. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2059-7029. ; 5:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: There is a paucity of data on the prognostic value of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) protein and gene expression in early breast cancer (BC) and the present study's aim was to comprehensively investigate it.Methods: The study consisted of three parts: a correlative analysis of PD-1 protein and gene expression from an original patient cohort of 564 patients with early BC; a systematic review and trial-level meta-analysis on the association between PD-1 protein expression and disease-free survival/overall survival (OS) in early BC; and a pooled gene expression analysis from publicly available transcriptomic datasets regarding PDCD1 expression.Results: In the study cohort, PD-1 protein, but not gene expression, was associated with improved OS (HRadj=0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.97, p=0.027 and HRadj=0.88, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.13, p=0.312, respectively). In the trial-level meta-analysis, PD-1 protein expression was not found to be statistically significantly associated with outcomes in the overall population. Finally, in the pooled gene expression analysis, higher PDCD1 expression was associated with better OS in multivariable analysis in the entire population (HRadj=0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99, p=0.025) and in basal-like tumours.Conclusions: PD-1 protein and gene expression seem to be promising prognostic factors in early BC. Standardisation of detection and assessment methods is of utmost importance.
|
|
| 8. |
- Matikas, Alexios, et al.
(författare)
-
Survival Outcomes, Digital TILs, and On-treatment PET/CT During Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer : Results from the Randomized PREDIX HER2 Trial
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Clinical Cancer Research. - : American Association For Cancer Research (AACR). - 1078-0432 .- 1557-3265. ; 29:3, s. 532-540
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose:PREDIX HER2 is a randomized Phase II trial that compared neoadjuvant docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (THP) with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2-positive breast cancer. Rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) did not differ between the two groups. Here, we present the survival outcomes from PREDIX HER2 and investigate metabolic response and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) as prognostic factors.Patients and Methods:In total, 202 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were enrolled and 197 patients received six cycles of either THP or T-DM1. Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Assessment with PET/CT was performed at baseline, after two and six treatment cycles. TILs were assessed manually at baseline biopsies, while image-based evaluation of TILs [digital TILs (DTIL)] was performed in digitized full-face sections.Results:After a median follow-up of 5.21 years, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in terms of EFS [HR = 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–2.91], RFS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.24–1.93), or OS (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.09–2.82). Higher SUVmax at cycle 2 (C2) predicted lower pCR (ORadj = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48–0.87; P = 0.005) and worse EFS (HRadj = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12–1.41; P < 0.001). Baseline TILs and DTILs provided additional prognostic information to clinical parameters and C2 SUVmax.Conclusions:Long-term outcomes following neoadjuvant T-DM1 were similar to neoadjuvant THP. SUVmax after two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer may be an independent predictor of both short- and long-term outcomes. Combined assessment with TILs may facilitate early selection of poor responders for alternative treatment strategies.
|
|
| 9. |
- Matikas, Alexios, et al.
(författare)
-
Tailored dose-dense versus standard adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk early breast cancer : end-of-study results of the randomized PANTHER trial
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Although dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy administered once every 2 weeks leads to superior outcomes compared with standard regimens once every 3 weeks, the observed improvement is largely limited to studies using the suboptimal paclitaxel schedule once every 3 weeks as control. PANTHER is an international phase III trial which compared sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel administered either once every 2 or once every 3 weeks, with tailored dosing at the dose-dense schedule according to hematologic toxicity. In this end-of-study analysis, the median follow-up was 10.3 years. Compared with standard adjuvant chemotherapy, dose-dense treatment improved breast cancer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98]; P = .030), event-free survival (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94]; P = .009), and distant disease-free survival (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98]; P = .030) while the improvement in overall survival was not statistically significant (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04]; P = .109). To our knowledge, this is the first trial that confirms the benefit of a dose-dense regimen over a control regimen containing docetaxel once every 3 weeks.
|
|
| 10. |
- Mijwel, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of Exercise on Chemotherapy Completion and Hospitalization Rates : The OptiTrain Breast Cancer Trial.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: The Oncologist. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1083-7159 .- 1549-490X. ; 25:1, s. 23-32
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Exercise during chemotherapy is suggested to provide clinical benefits, including improved chemotherapy completion. Despite this, few randomized controlled exercise trials have reported on such clinical endpoints. From the OptiTrain trial we previously showed positive effects on physiological and health-related outcomes after 16 weeks of supervised exercise in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Here, we examined the effects of exercise on rates of chemotherapy completion and hospitalization, as well as on blood cell concentrations during chemotherapy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty women scheduled for chemotherapy were randomized to 16 weeks of resistance and high-intensity interval training (RT-HIIT), moderate-intensity aerobic and high-intensity interval training (AT-HIIT), or usual care (UC). Outcomes included chemotherapy completion, hospitalization, hemoglobin, lymphocyte, thrombocyte, and neutrophil concentrations during chemotherapy.RESULTS: No significant between-groups differences were found in the proportion of participants who required dose reductions (RT-HIIT vs. UC: odds ratio [OR], 1.08; AT-HIIT vs. UC: OR, 1.39), or average relative dose intensity of chemotherapy between groups (RT-HIIT vs. UC: effect size [ES], 0.08; AT-HIIT vs. UC: ES, -0.07). A significantly lower proportion of participants in the RT-HIIT group (3%) were hospitalized during chemotherapy compared with UC (15%; OR, 0.20). A significantly lower incidence of thrombocytopenia was found for both RT-HIIT (11%) and AT-HIIT (10%) versus UC (30%; OR, 0.27; OR, 0.27).CONCLUSION: No beneficial effects of either RT-HIIT or AT-HIIT on chemotherapy completion rates were found. However, combined resistance training and high-intensity interval training were effective to reduce hospitalization rates, and both exercise groups had a positive effect on thrombocytopenia. These are important findings with potential positive implications for the health of women with breast cancer and costs associated with treatment-related complications.IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Completing the prescribed chemotherapy regimen is strongly associated with a good prognosis for patients with primary breast cancer. Despite this, treatment-induced side effects make it necessary to reduce or alter the treatment regimen and can also lead to hospitalization. Exercise during chemotherapy is suggested to provide clinical benefits, including improved chemotherapy completion. This study showed that combined resistance and high-intensity interval training during chemotherapy resulted in lower hospitalization rates and a lower incidence of thrombocytopenia in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. However, no beneficial effects of either exercise program on chemotherapy completion rates were found, which is in contrast to previous findings in this population. The findings reported in the current article have positive implications for the health of women with breast cancer and costs associated with treatment-related complications.
|
|
