| 1. |
- Garellick, Göran, 1948, et al.
(författare)
-
Att börja på ny kula
- 2006
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Havelin, L. I., et al.
(författare)
-
The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Acta Orthopaedica. - 1745-3682. ; 80:4, s. 1-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and purpose The possibility of comparing results and of pooling the data has been limited for the Nordic arthroplasty registries, because of different registration systems and questionnaires. We have established a common Nordic database, in order to compare demographics and the results of total hip replacement surgery between countries. In addition, we plan to study results in patient groups in which the numbers are too small to be studied in the individual countries. Material and methods Primary total hip replacements (THRs) from 1995-2006 were selected for the study. Denmark, Sweden, and Norway contributed data. A common code set was made and Cox multiple regression, with adjustment for age, sex, and diagnosis was used to calculate prosthesis survival with any revision as endpoint. Results 280,201 operations were included (69,242 from Denmark, 140,821 from Sweden, and 70,138 from Norway). Females accounted for 60% of the patients in Denmark and Sweden, and 70% in Norway. Childhood disease was the cause of 3.1%, 1.8%, and 8.7% of the operations in Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, respectively. Resurfacing of hips accounted for 0.5% or less in all countries. The posterior approach was used in 91% of cases in Denmark, 60% in Sweden, and 24% in Norway. Cemented THRs were used in 46% of patients in Denmark, in 89% of patients in Sweden, and in 79% of patients in Norway. Of the 280,201 primary THRs, 9,596 (3.4%) had been revised. 10-year survival was 92% (95% CI: 91.6-92.4) in Denmark, 94% (95% CI: 93.6-94.1) in Sweden, and 93% (95% CI: 92.3-93.0) in Norway. In Denmark, 34% of the revisions were due to dislocation, as compared to 23% in Sweden and Norway. Replacement of only cup or liner constituted 44% of the revisions in Denmark, 29% in Sweden, and 33% in Norway. Interpretation This unique common Nordic collaboration has shown differences between the countries concerning demographics, prosthesis fixation, and survival. The large number of patients in this database significantly widens our horizons for future research.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Leonardsson, Olof, et al.
(författare)
-
Outcome after primary and secondary replacement for subcapital fracture of the hip in 10 264 patients.
- 2009
-
Ingår i: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. - 0301-620X .- 2044-5377. ; 91:5, s. 595-600
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Between 1999 and 2005, 10 264 patients who had undergone total hip replacement (THR) for subcapital fracture of the hip were compared with 76 520 in whom THR had been performed for other reasons. All the cases were identified through the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. The THRs performed as primary treatment for fracture were also compared with those done after failure of internal fixation. After seven years the rate of revision was higher in THR after fracture (4.4% vs 2.9%). Dislocation and periprosthetic fracture were the most common causes of revision. The risk was higher in men than in women. The type of femoral component and the surgical approach influenced the risk. After correction for gender, type of component and the surgical approach the revision rates were similar in the primary and secondary fracture THR groups. Total hip replacement is therefore a safe method for both the primary and secondary management of fracture of the hip.
|
|
| 10. |
- Lindahl, Hans, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register
- 2005
-
Ingår i: J Arthroplasty. - : Elsevier BV. - 0883-5403. ; 20:7, s. 857-65
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Postoperative femoral periprosthetic fracture is an uncommon complication of total hip arthroplasty surgery, but several centers worldwide have recently reported an increase in total numbers of such fractures. This severe complication is costly for society and results in high morbidity. Our analysis of 1049 periprosthetic fractures occurring in Sweden between 1979 and 2000 and recorded in the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register focuses on patient- and implant-related factors, fracture classification, and fracture frequency. These were our 3 major findings: (1) a majority of the patients who sustained a late periprosthetic femoral fracture had a loose stem. (2) Implant-related factors are significantly associated with occurrence of a periprosthetic fracture. (3) Since the 1980s in Sweden, treatment results for periprosthetic fractures have been poor, with low long-term survivorship and a high frequency of complications. We have initiated further studies of this important problem.
|
|
