| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Björnsson, Bergthor, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial
- 2020
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : WILEY. - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 107:10, s. 1281-1288
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Studies have suggested that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is advantageous compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) regarding hospital stay, blood loss and recovery. Only one randomized study is available, which showed enhanced functional recovery after LDP compared with ODP. Methods Consecutive patients evaluated at a multidisciplinary tumour board and planned for standard distal pancreatectomy were randomized prospectively to LDP or ODP in an unblinded, parallel-group, single-centre superiority trial. The primary outcome was postoperative hospital stay. Results Of 105 screened patients, 60 were randomized and 58 (24 women, 41 per cent) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis; there were 29 patients of mean age 68 years in the LDP group and 29 of mean age 63 years in the ODP group. The main indication was cystic pancreatic lesions, followed by neuroendocrine tumours. The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 (i.q.r. 4-5) days in the laparoscopic group versus 6 (5-7) days in the open group (P = 0 center dot 002). Functional recovery was attained after a median of 4 (i.q.r. 2-6) versus 6 (4-7) days respectively (P = 0 center dot 007), and duration of surgery was 120 min in both groups (P = 0 center dot 482). Blood loss was less with laparoscopic surgery: median 50 (i.q.r. 25-150) ml versus 100 (100-300) ml in the open group (P = 0 center dot 018). No difference was found in the complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade III or above: 4 versus 8 patients respectively). The rate of delayed gastric emptying and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula did not differ between the groups. Conclusion LDP is associated with shorter hospital stay than ODP, with shorter time to functional recovery and less bleeding. Registration number: ISRCTN26912858 ( ).
|
|
| 4. |
- Björnsson, Bergthor, et al.
(författare)
-
Digital twins to personalize medicine
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Genome Medicine. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1756-994X. ; 12:1
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Personalized medicine requires the integration and processing of vast amounts of data. Here, we propose a solution to this challenge that is based on constructing Digital Twins. These are high-resolution models of individual patients that are computationally treated with thousands of drugs to find the drug that is optimal for the patient.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Johansen, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Complications and chemotherapy have little impact on postoperative quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy - a cohort study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: HPB. - : Elsevier Science Ltd. - 1365-182X .- 1477-2574. ; 24:9, s. 1464-1473
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: With the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer and the high rate of postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, it is important to evaluate how the operation affects patients quality of life. Methods: This single-centre study included all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2006 to 2016. Quality of life was measured with two questionnaires preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Comparisons between groups were made using a linear mixed models analysis. Results: Of 279 patients planned for pancreaticoduodenectomy, 245 underwent the operation. The postoperative response rates were all 80% or more. Differences were found in one domain between the early and late time periods and three domains between patients receiving and not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. No significant differences were found between patients with and without severe postoperative complications. However, the demographic variables of age group, sex, preoperative diabetes and smoking all exerted a significant impact on postoperative quality of life. Conclusion: While little or no impact was shown for the factors of postoperative complications, time period and adjuvant chemotherapy, demographic data, such as age, sex, preoperative diabetes and smoking, had considerable impacts on postoperative quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
|
|
| 7. |
- Johansen, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
High resection rate improves overall survival in elderly patients with pancreatic head cancer - A cohort study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Surgery Open. - : Elsevier Science Ltd. - 2405-8572. ; 34
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: There is evidence that a high hospital volume of pancreaticoduodenectomy improves short-and long-term outcomes, but there are few population-based studies on the effect of a high resection rate in the population. The aim of this national, observational study was primarily to investigate differences in overall survival among elderly patients with cancer in the pancreatic head between high and low resection rate groups and secondarily to determine if counties with high resection rates of pancreaticoduodenectomy had more severe complications after surgery. Materials and methods: All patients in the Swedish National Registry for tumours in the pancreatic and periampullary region diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 with pancreatic head cancer were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into low and high resection rate groups according to the yearly resection rates in the respective counties. For operative outcomes, all patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy were included regardless of diagnosis. The primary outcome of the study was overall survival among patients aged >= 70 years with pancreatic head cancer. Results: Among 13 933 patients in the registry, 7661 were 70 years or older, of whom 3006 had pancreatic head cancer. Overall survival was longer in high resection rate groups for patients aged >= 70 years, as for the age subgroups 70-79 years and >= 80 years (all p < 0.001). Among patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy aged >= 80 years the high resection rate counties showed an increased rate of severe complications, but no increase in 90-day mortality. Conclusion: High resection rate groups show a significantly longer overall survival among elderly patients with pancreatic head cancer in Sweden. This implies that there could be a survival benefit from increasing resections in low resection rate groups. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd.
|
|
| 8. |
- Johansen, Karin, 1990-, et al.
(författare)
-
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is more cost-effective than open resection: results from a Swedish randomized controlled trial
- 2023
-
Ingår i: HPB. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 1365-182X .- 1477-2574. ; 25:8, s. 972-979
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundLaparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is being implemented worldwide. The aim of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from a health care perspective.MethodsThis cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the randomized controlled trial LAPOP, where 60 patients were randomized to open or laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. For the follow-up of two years, resource use from a health care perspective was recorded, and health-related quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L. The per-patient mean cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared using nonparametric bootstrapping.ResultsFifty-six patients were included in the analysis. The mean health care costs were lower, €3863 (95% CI: -€8020 to €385), for the laparoscopic group. Postoperative quality of life improved with laparoscopic resection and resulted in a gain in QALYs of 0.08 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.25). The laparoscopic group had lower costs and improved QALYs in 79% of bootstrap samples. With a cost-per-QALY threshold of €50 000, 95.4% of the bootstrap samples were in favour of laparoscopic resection.ConclusionLaparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with numerically lower health care costs and improvements in QALYs compared with the open approach. The results support the ongoing transition from open to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies.
|
|
| 9. |
- Johansen, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Preoperative Biliary Drainage Does Not Independently Reduce Survival After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Among Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma : A National Registry Study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery Open: perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches. - : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. - 2691-3593. ; 2:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: This study aimed to explore a possible relationship between preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) and overall survival in a national cohort of Swedish patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Background: PBD has been shown to increase postoperative complications after PD, but its use is steadily increasing. There are a few small studies that have indicated that PBD might in itself negatively affect overall survival after PD. Methods: Patients from the Swedish National Registry for tumors in the pancreatic and periampullary region diagnosed from 2010 to 2019 who underwent PD for PDAC were included. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to investigate survival. Results: Out of 15,818 patients in the registry, 3113 had undergone PD, of whom 1471 had a histopathological diagnosis of PDAC. Patients who had undergone PBD had significantly worse survival, but the effect of PBD disappeared in the multivariable analysis when elevated bilirubin at any time was included. Conclusions: PBD does not independently influence survival after PD for PDAC, but this study implies that even a nominally increased preoperative bilirubin level might impair long-term survival.
|
|
| 10. |
- Johansen, Karin, 1990-, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality of life after open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: long-term results from a randomized clinical trial
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS. - 2474-9842. ; 7:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Pancreatic surgery is rapidly transitioning towards minimally invasive methods. Positive results have been published regarding the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, but postoperative quality of life after operation remains relatively unexplored. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term quality of life after open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.Methods A long-term analysis of quality-of-life data after laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy based on the LAPOP trial (a single-centre, superiority, parallel, open-label, RCT in which patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy were randomized 1 : 1 to either the open or laparoscopic approach). Patients received the quality-of-life questionnaires QLQ-C30 and PAN26 before surgery and at 5-6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery.Results Between September 2015 and February 2019, a total of 60 patients were randomized, and 54 patients (26 in the open group and 28 in the laparoscopic group) were included in the quality-of-life analysis. A significant difference was observed in six domains in the mixed model analysis, with better results among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. At the 2-year measurement, a statistically significant difference between groups was seen in three domains, and a clinically relevant difference of 10 or more was seen in 16 domains, with better results among the patients who underwent laparoscopic resection.Conclusion Considerable differences were shown in postoperative quality of life after laparoscopic compared with open distal pancreatectomy, with better results among the patients who had undergone laparoscopic resection. Of note, some of these differences persisted up to 2 years after surgery. These results strengthen the ongoing transition from open to minimally invasive pancreatic surgery for distal pancreatectomy. Registration number: ISRCTN26912858 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
|
|
