| 1. |
- Rechl, Victor, et al.
(författare)
-
Factors Influencing the Outcome of Patients with Primary Ewing Sarcoma of the Sacrum.
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Sarcoma. - 1357-714X. ; 2024
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a rare and highly malignant bone tumor primarily affecting children, adolescents, and young adults. The pelvis, trunk, and lower extremities are the most common sites, while EwS of the sacrum as a primary site is very rare, and only few studies focusing on this location are published. Due to the anatomical condition, local treatment is challenging in sacral malignancies. We analyzed factors that might influence the outcome of patients suffering from sacral EwS.We retrospectively analyzed data of the GPOH EURO-E.W.I.N.G 99 trial and the EWING 2008 trial, with a cohort of 124 patients with localized or metastatic sacral EwS. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). OS and EFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate comparisons were estimated using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in a multivariable Cox regression model.The presence of metastases (3y-EFS: 0.33 vs. 0.68; P < 0.001; HR=3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.6; 3y-OS: 0.48 vs. 0.85; P < 0.001; HR=4.23, 95% CI 1.8 to 9.7), large tumor volume (≥200ml) (3y-EFS: 0.36 vs. 0.69; P=0.02; HR=2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.0; 3y-OS: 0.42 vs. 0.73; P=0.04; HR=2.1, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.5), and age ≥18years (3y-EFS: 0.41 vs. 0.60; P=0.02; HR=2.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.2; 3y-OS: 0.294 vs. 0.59; P=0.01; HR=2.92, 95% CI 1.29 to 6.6) were revealed as adverse prognostic factors.Young age seems to positively influence patients` survival, especially in patients with primary metastatic disease. In this context, our results support other studies, stating that older age has a negative impact on survival. Tumor volume, metastases, and the type of local therapy modality have an impact on the outcome of sacral EwS. Level of evidence: Level 2. This trial is registered with NCT00020566 and NCT00987636.
|
|
| 2. |
- Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani, Sahar, et al.
(författare)
-
PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE : Collaboration for implementation of precision cancer medicine in Europe
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - 1651-226X .- 1651-226X. ; 63, s. 385-391
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: In the two European Union (EU)-funded projects, PCM4EU (Personalized Cancer Medicine for all EU citizens) and PRIME-ROSE (Precision Cancer Medicine Repurposing System Using Pragmatic Clinical Trials), we aim to facilitate implementation of precision cancer medicine (PCM) in Europe by leveraging the experience from ongoing national initiatives that have already been particularly successful. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE gather 17 and 24 partners, respectively, from 19 European countries. The projects are based on a network of Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP)-like clinical trials that are currently ongoing or soon to start in 11 different countries, and with more trials expected to be established soon. The main aims of both the projects are to improve implementation pathways from molecular diagnostics to treatment, and reimbursement of diagnostics and tumour-tailored therapies to provide examples of best practices for PCM in Europe. RESULTS: PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE were launched in January and July 2023, respectively. Educational materials, including a podcast series, are already available from the PCM4EU website (http://www.pcm4eu.eu). The first reports, including an overview of requirements for the reimbursement systems in participating countries and a guide on patient involvement, are expected to be published in 2024. CONCLUSION: European collaboration can facilitate the implementation of PCM and thereby provide affordable and equitable access to precision diagnostics and matched therapies for more patients. ble from the PCM4EU website (http://www.pcm4eu.eu). The first reports, including an overview of requirements for the reimbursement systems in participating countries and a guide on patient involvement, are expected to be published in 2024. CONCLUSION: European collaboration can facilitate the implementation of PCM and thereby provide affordable and equitable access to precision diagnostics and matched therapies for more patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Koch, Raphael, et al.
(författare)
-
Zoledronic Acid Add-on Therapy for Standard-Risk Ewing Sarcoma Patients in the Ewing 2008R1 Trial
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. - 1078-0432. ; 29:24, s. 5057-5068
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: The phase III, open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized Ewing 2008R1 trial (EudraCT2008-003658-13) was conducted in 12 countries to evaluate the effect of zoledronic acid (ZOL) maintenance therapy compared with no add-on regarding event-free survival (EFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) in standard-risk Ewing sarcoma (EWS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had localized EWS with either good histologic response to induction chemotherapy and/or small tumors (<200 mL). Patients received six cycles of VIDE induction and eight cycles of VAI (male) or eight cycles of VAC (female) consolidation. ZOL treatment started parallel to the sixth consolidation cycle. Randomization was stratified by tumor site (pelvis/other). The two-sided adaptive inverse-normal four-stage design (planned sample size 448 patients, significance level 5%, power 80%) was changed after the first interim analysis using the Müller-Schäfer method. RESULTS: Between April 2010 and November 2018, 284 patients were randomized (142 ZOL/142 no add-on). With a median follow-up of 3.9 years, EFS was not significantly different between ZOL and no add-on group in the adaptive design (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.43-1.28, P = 0.27, intention-to-treat). Three-year EFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 77.7%-90.8%) for ZOL vs. 81.7% (95% CI, 75.2%-88.8%) for no add-on. Results were similar in the per-protocol collective. OS was not different between groups. The 3-year OS was 92.8% (95% CI, 88.4%-97.5%) for ZOL and 94.6% (95% CI, 90.9%-98.6%) for no add-on. Noticeable more renal, neurologic, and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed for ZOL (P < 0.05). Severe renal toxicities occurred more often in the ZOL arm (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with standard-risk localized EWS, there is no additional benefit from maintenance treatment with ZOL.
|
|
| 4. |
- Taskén, Kjetil, et al.
(författare)
-
Single point of entry to the European precision cancer medicine trial network PRIME-ROSE
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 1527-7755 .- 0732-183X. ; 42:16
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Over the last decades, there has been a surge in the development and approval of targeted drugs and immunotherapies for treating cancer patients, as seen by the 757 % increase in approvals by the FDA for new cancer treatments since 2000 (1). This has significantly impacted cancer care and contributed to improving overall survival in various cancer subgroups. However, access to these new treatments is constrained by the market access strategy of the patent-owning company and available knowledge of treatment effects. Only a few treatments have received pan-cancer approval from EMA or FDA, and most drugs receive market authorization per indication. As a result, there is a widening access gap between patients with different cancer types (2). Methods: Exploring the effect of biomarker-driven treatments in new cancer subtypes requires the ability to find patients with rare biomarkers. PRIME-ROSE is a European precision medicine network comprising 11 ongoing or soon-to-start national DRUP-like clinical trials testing registered drugs outside their current label (www.prime-rose.eu). Patients with relevant tumor biomarkers are identified and treated with matched drugs available in each trial’s drug portfolio. The ambition is to swiftly and systematically evaluate the effectiveness of approved precision cancer medicines in new indications through pragmatic trial designs and with RWE control cohorts, ensuring expansion into all relevant patient groups to maximize societal benefit. This is particularly relevant for rare cancers, which are enriched in precision medicine trials (3). Results: In PRIME-ROSE, the trials now share and aggregate data to build evidence faster and more effectively impact patient care by addressing key challenges in precision cancer medicine implementation (increasing the recruitment area to 71 million inhabitants). This will significantly reduce the time for filling treatment cohorts and contribute to closing the indication/drug-specific knowledge gap. In fact, several pharmaceutical companies have already shown their interest in and commitment to participating in PRIME-ROSE, as it offers the unique advantage of entering the trials in the network simultaneously (single point of entry) and with a floating allocation of treatment slots between trials, increasing efficiency in finding patients with specific biomarkers to fill treatment cohorts. Conclusions: A unified entry point to the PRIME-ROSE network is feasible and can facilitate building the knowledge base faster for label expansion and/or country-specific approvals/ reimbursement. National multi-stakeholder ecosystems that include pragmatic, RWE-controlled DRUP-like clinical trials may advance precision medicine implementation.
|
|
