| 1. |
- Enblad, Malin, et al.
(författare)
-
Importance of Absent Neoplastic Epithelium in Patients Treated With Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1068-9265 .- 1534-4681. ; 23:4, s. 1149-1156
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The importance of absent neoplastic epithelium in specimens from cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic value of histopathology without neoplastic epithelium in patients treated with CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Data were extracted from medical records and histopathology reports for patients treated with initial CRS and HIPEC at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, between 2004 and 2012. Patients with inoperable disease and patients undergoing palliative non-CRS surgery were excluded from the study. Patients lacking neoplastic epithelium in surgical specimens from CRS, with or without mucin, were classified as "neoplastic epithelium absent" (NEA), and patients with neoplastic epithelium were classified as "neoplastic epithelium present" (NEP). The study observed NEA in 78 of 353 patients (22 %). Mucin was found in 28 of the patients with NEA. For low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and adenomas, the 5-year overall survival rate was 100 % for NEA and 84 % for NEP, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100 % for NEA and 59 % for NEP. For appendiceal/colorectal adenocarcinomas (including tumors of the small intestine), the 5-year overall survival rate was 61 % for NEA and 38 % for NEP, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 60 % for NEA and 14 % for NEP. Carcinoembryonic antigen level, peritoneal cancer index, and completeness of the cytoreduction score were lower in patients with NEA. A substantial proportion of patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC have NEA. These patients have a favorable prognosis and a decreased risk of recurrence. Differences in patient selection can affect the proportion of NEA and hence explain differences in survival rates between reported series.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ghanipour, Lana, et al.
(författare)
-
Detection of prognostic biomarkers with solid-phase proximity ligation assay in patients with colorectal cancer
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Translational Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1944-7124 .- 1936-5233. ; 9:3, s. 251-255
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In the search for prognostic biomarkers a significant amount of precious biobanked blood samples is needed if conventional analyses are used. Solid-phase proximity ligation assay (SP-PLA) is an analytic method with the ability to analyse many proteins at the same time in small amounts of plasma. The aim of this study was to explore the potential use of SP-PLA in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).Material and methods: Plasma from patients with stage I-IV CRC, with (n=31) and without (n=29) disease dissemination at diagnosis or later, was analysed with SP-PLA using 35 antibodies targeting an equal number of proteins in 5 ml plasma. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), analysed earlier on this cohort, was used as a reference.Results: A total of 21 of the 35 proteins were detectable with SP-PLA. Patients in stage II-III with disseminated disease had lower plasma concentrations of HCC-4 (p=0.025). Low plasma levels of TIMP-1 were seen in patients with disseminated disease stage II (p=0.003). The level of CEA was higher in patients with disease dissemination compared to those without (p=0.007).Conclusion: SP-PLA has the ability to analyse many tumour markers simultaneously in a small amount of blood. However, none of the markers selected for the present SP-PLA analyses gave better prognostic information compared with CEA.
|
|
