SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Gisleskog Per Olsson)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Gisleskog Per Olsson) > (2020) > Pharmacometric Inve...

Pharmacometric Investigations of Prediction Precision and Advances of Models for Composite Scale Data

Wellhagen, Gustaf, 1988- (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för farmaci,Farmakometri
Kjellsson, Maria C., docent, 1975- (preses)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för farmaci
Hamrén, Bengt, Dr. (preses)
AstraZeneca AB
visa fler...
Olsson Gisleskog, Per, Dr. (opponent)
POG Pharmacometrics
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
ISBN 9789151310671
Uppsala : Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2020
Engelska 86 s.
  • Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Clinical trials are needed to evaluate new treatments. In late-stage clinical trials, failures are mostly due to lack of efficacy. Fit-for-purpose analysis methods will likely increase the success rates and advance drug development by providing higher precision to support decisions such as go/no-go, dose selection, or sample size. This thesis presents new methods for analysis of composite scale data, and comparisons of prediction precision of new and standard analysis methods. Composite scale data arise from questions/items rated with integers. A total score can be derived, which is discrete and bounded. Item response theory (IRT) models are the natural choice for such data, since they use the item-level information. However, when only the total score is available they cannot be used. The bounded integer (BI) model is a new method for discrete, bounded outcomes. With composite scale total score data, it had superior fit compared to standard methods, because it respects the nature of the data. Further, a new method, formally linking IRT models to models for total score, was developed. The expected mean and variance, given an IRT model, was implemented in BI and continuous variable models. This improved fit, allowed estimation of IRT parameters, and allowed comparison of different model types.The prediction precision of both outcome and parameters were investigated with different methods, ranging from t-test to mechanistic pharmacometric models, for composite scale and continuous data. The most suitable method depended on the purpose, for example mechanistic models are superior at establishing a drug’s site of action.In conclusion, the choice of method should be based on the primary question, and also the data collected. The method should not be more complex than necessary, and the nature of the data respected. This thesis will help modellers select the most appropriate analysis method for a problem at hand.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Farmaceutiska vetenskaper (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Pharmaceutical Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

pharmacometrics
modelling
non-linear mixed effects modelling
composite scale data
total score data
total score analysis
precision prediction
bounded integer
bounded integer model
IRT-informed total score analysis
item response theory-informed
mixed models for repeated measures
MMRM
dose-response
dose-response mixed models for repeated measures
DR-MMRM
HbA1c models
fit-for-purpose analysis
clinical trial analysis
Farmaceutisk vetenskap
Pharmaceutical Science

Publikations- och innehållstyp

vet (ämneskategori)
dok (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy