Search: WFRF:(Glaudemans Andor W J M)
> (2024) >
A systematic review...
A systematic review for the evidence of recommendations and guidelines in hybrid nuclear cardiovascular imaging.
-
Besson, Florent L (author)
-
Treglia, Giorgio (author)
-
Bucerius, Jan (author)
-
show more...
-
Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos (author)
-
Buechel, Ronny R (author)
-
Dweck, Marc R (author)
-
Erba, Paula A (author)
-
Gaemperli, Oliver (author)
-
Gimelli, Alessia (author)
-
Gheysens, Olivier (author)
-
Glaudemans, Andor W J M (author)
-
Habib, Gilbert (author)
-
Hyafil, Fabian (author)
-
- Lubberink, Mark (author)
- Uppsala universitet,Radiologi
-
Rischpler, Christopher (author)
-
Saraste, Antti (author)
-
Slart, Riemer H J A (author)
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2024
- 2024
- English.
-
In: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. - 1619-7070 .- 1619-7089.
- Related links:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
show more...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the level of evidence of expert recommendations and guidelines for clinical indications and procedurals in hybrid nuclear cardiovascular imaging.METHODS: From inception to August 2023, a PubMed literature analysis of the latest version of guidelines for clinical hybrid cardiovascular imaging techniques including SPECT(/CT), PET(/CT), and PET(/MRI) was performed in two categories: (1) for clinical indications for all-in primary diagnosis; subgroup in prognosis and therapy evaluation; and for (2) imaging procedurals. We surveyed to what degree these followed a standard methodology to collect the data and provide levels of evidence, and for which topic systematic review evidence was executed.RESULTS: A total of 76 guidelines, published between 2013 and 2023, were included. The evidence of guidelines was based on systematic reviews in 7.9% of cases, non-systematic reviews in 47.4% of cases, a mix of systematic and non-systematic reviews in 19.7%, and 25% of guidelines did not report any evidence. Search strategy was reported in 36.8% of cases. Strengths of recommendation were clearly reported in 25% of guidelines. The notion of external review was explicitly reported in 23.7% of cases. Finally, the support of a methodologist was reported in 11.8% of the included guidelines.CONCLUSION: The use of evidence procedures for developing for evidence-based cardiovascular hybrid imaging recommendations and guidelines is currently suboptimal, highlighting the need for more standardized methodological procedures.
Keyword
- Cardiovascular guidelines
- Evidence-based practice
- Hybrid imaging
- Positron emission tomography
- Recommendations
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database
- By the author/editor
-
Besson, Florent ...
-
Treglia, Giorgio
-
Bucerius, Jan
-
Anagnostopoulos, ...
-
Buechel, Ronny R
-
Dweck, Marc R
-
show more...
-
Erba, Paula A
-
Gaemperli, Olive ...
-
Gimelli, Alessia
-
Gheysens, Olivie ...
-
Glaudemans, Ando ...
-
Habib, Gilbert
-
Hyafil, Fabian
-
Lubberink, Mark
-
Rischpler, Chris ...
-
Saraste, Antti
-
Slart, Riemer H ...
-
show less...
- Articles in the publication
-
European Journal ...
- By the university
-
Uppsala University