| 3. |
- Hjamarson, A, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of controlled-release metoprolol on total mortality, hospitalizations, and well-being in patients with heart failure. The Metoprolol CR/XL randomized intervention trial in congestive heart failure
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American Medical Association. - : JAMA. - 0221-7678. ; 283:10, s. 1295-1302
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Results from recent studies on the effects of beta1-blockade in patients with heart failure demonstrated a 34% reduction in total mortality. However, the effect of beta1-blockade on the frequency of hospitalizations, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with heart failure has not been fully explored. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of the beta1-blocker controlled-release/extended-release metoprolol succinate (metoprolol CR/XL) on mortality, hospitalization, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind controlled trial, preceded by a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, conducted from February 14, 1997, to October 31, 1998, with a mean follow-up of 1 year. SETTING: Three hundred thirteen sites in 14 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 3991) with chronic heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to IV, and ejection fraction of 0.40 or less who were stabilized with optimum standard therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to metoprolol CR/XL, 25 mg once per day (NYHA class II), or 12.5 mg once per day (NYHA class III or IV), titrated for 6 to 8 weeks up to a target dosage of 200 mg once per day (n = 1990); or matching placebo (n = 2001). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total mortality or any hospitalization (time to first event), number of hospitalizations for worsening heart failure, and change in NYHA class, by intervention group; quality of life was assessed in a substudy of 741 patients. RESULTS: The incidence of all predefined end points was lower in the metoprolol CR/XL group than in the placebo group, including total mortality or all-cause hospitalizations (the prespecified second primary end point; 641 vs 767 events; risk reduction, 19%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-27%; P<.001); total mortality or hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure (311 vs 439 events; risk reduction, 31%; 95% CI, 20%-40%; P<.001), number of hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure (317 vs 451; P<.001); and number of days in hospital due to worsening heart failure (3401 vs 5303 days; P<.001). NYHA functional class, assessed by physicians, and McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation score, assessed by patients, both improved in the metoprolol CR/XL group compared with the placebo group (P = .003 and P = .009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with symptomatic heartfailure, metoprolol CR/XL improved survival, reduced the need for hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure, improved NYHA functional class, and had beneficial effects on patient well-being.
|
|
| 4. |
- Larsson, Lisa, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Beneficial effect on cardiac function by intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy is not due to neutralization of anti-receptor autoantibody
- 2004
-
Ingår i: Autoimmunity. - 0891-6934. ; 37:6-7, s. 489-493
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Anti-beta1-adrenoceptor (beta1AR) autoantibodies have been shown to be pathophysiologically important in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has shown beneficial effects in both DCM and ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, the underlying mechanism has not been clarified. In the present study, we therefore examined whether the improvement of cardiac function was due to neutralization of functional beta1AR autoantibodies by anti-idiotypic antibodies. Autoantibodies against the beta1AR was analysed in sera from patients with DCM and coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with IVIG or placebo before, 6 and 12 months. Six month after treatment, DCM patients showed increase in beta1AR autoantibodies, mostly in IgG1 and IgG2, whereas in CAD patients mostly in IgG2. No changes in beta1AR autoantibodies after 12 months were detected. In summary, our results indicate that improvement of cardiac function by IVIG is not due to neutralization of beta1AR autoantibodies.
|
|
