| 1. |
- Hallonsten, Gösta, et al.
(författare)
-
Benedikt XVI/Joseph Ratzinger
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Moderne teologi: Tradisjon og nytenkning hos det 20. århundrets teologer. - 9788276345858 ; , s. 324-337
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- The Article is an introduction to the theology of Benedikt XVI/Joseph Ratzinger based on an analysis of his main works. It is shown that Joseph Ratzinger is part of the general renewal of Roman Catholic theology during the second half of the 20th century. Contrary to widespread assumptions there can be shown only small changes in the writings of this important theologian and present pope.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Hallonsten, Gösta
(författare)
-
Gardells GT-brottning
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Signum: Katolsk orientering om kyrka, kultur, samhälle. - 0347-0423. ; 34:4, s. 30-35
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Artikeln är en kritisk diskussion av Jonas Gardells bok "Om Gud". Särskilt fokuseras på frågan om helhetstolkning av Bibeln och vad vi menar med uppenbarelse.
|
|
| 5. |
- Hallonsten, Gösta
(författare)
-
Kristen och postkristen teologi - en lägesrapport
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Signum: Katolsk orientering om kyrka, kultur, samhälle. - 0347-0423. ; 34:2, s. 8-14
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Artikeln är en kritisk diskussion av Martinson, Sigurdson, Svenungsson, "Systematisk teologi - en introduktion" 2007 och av Mattias Martinson, "Postkristen teologi - experiment och tydningsförsök" 2007.
|
|
| 6. |
- Hallonsten, Gösta
(författare)
-
När blev Jesus Guds Son?
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift. - 0039-6761. ; 85:1, s. 14-18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Popular discussions over Jesus as the Son of God are mostly predetermined by the Creed or by a ”Christology from above”. Against this background the question on when Jesus began to be called ”Son of God” might be answered in a reductionist way, giving priority to the oldest and least developed forms of Christology. As a matter of fact, however, historical-critical exegesis has shown that titles and names given Jesus in the gospels are diverse. Christological titles are confessions of faith that try to explicate the new and overwhelming experience of Jesus being raised by God after having died an ignominious death on the cross. The apparent negation of the message and claims of Jesus by his execution was refuted by God through his resurrection. In the light of this Jesus was interpreted anew through recollection of what had happened in combination with an ongoing reclecture of the Scriptures. The point in time when Jesus was assigned title Son of God was pushed back, and the meaning of the title was being deepended. ”Christology from below” led to ”Christology from above”. Jesus ”became” the Son of God, and he was believed to be so from the beginning! How is that paradox possible to uphold? Most likely through paying attention to the ever remaining dialectics between Jesus and the Creed. Also: Wouldn’t it be possible to simultaneously hold that Jesus became the Son of God – at resurrection, baptism, annunciation – and that he was the Son of God from eternity? Within the limits of a now out-dated ontology of substance, I contend that this was what the Chalcedonian dogma intended to say.
|
|
| 7. |
- Hallonsten, Gösta, et al.
(författare)
-
Theosis in Recent Research: A Renewal of Interest and a Need for Clarity
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Partakers of the Divine Nature. The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions.. - 9780838641118 - 0838641113
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This article was given as a paper at the conference on Deification/Theosis at Drew University, Madison, N.J. in May 2004. The article adresses the growing interest in deification/theosis in contemporary Western theology. Recent research on deification/theosis in Luther and Thomas Aquinas are critically evaluated. The article ends with a proposal. For the better understanding of similarities and differences between Eastern and Western talk on the topic one should distinguish between the theme of deification/theosis and the doctrine proper.
|
|
| 8. |
-
Sarah Coakley - A Symposium
- 2009
-
Proceedings (redaktörskap) (refereegranskat)abstract
- The papers of the Sarah Coakley Symposium held at the Centre for Theology and Religious Studies, Lund University, on April 15th 2009 are published here. After an introduction to the symposium by the editor, the key note adress of Sarah Coakley follows: "Is there a Future for Gender and Theology? On Gender, Contemplation and the Systematic Task". Papers on the theology of Sarah Coakley are given by Antje Jackelén, Philip Geister, Anne-Louise Eriksson, Jonna Bornemark and Jayne Svenungsson. Responses by Sarah Coakley are included.
|
|
