| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Hallonsten, Olof, et al.
(författare)
-
Afterword
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Metaphors We Supervise By. - 9789144184197 ; , s. 135-138
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
- Hallonsten, Olof, et al.
(författare)
-
Got it, do it!
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Metaphors We Supervise By. - 9789144184197 ; , s. 127-132
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
- Hallonsten, Olof, et al.
(författare)
-
Introduction
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Metaphors We Supervise By. - 9789144184197 ; , s. 7-12
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 5. |
- Hallonsten, Olof, et al.
(författare)
-
Is there an ‘iron law’ of Big Science?
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Big Science and Research Infrastructures in Europe. - : Edward Elgar Publishing. - 9781839100000 - 9781839100017 ; , s. 217-231
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Big Science is costly and complex, and historical evidence seems to suggest that projects often get delayed and more expensive than planned. On the basis of several studies of large infrastructures such as railroads and bridges, the Danish geographer Bent Flyvbjerg has proposed that there is an “iron law” of megaprojects, meaning that they almost without exception turn out more expensive and more time-consuming to complete than originally envisaged. In this chapter, the “iron law” is applied on Big Science in Europe, to see whether it holds, and if so, to make a preliminary analysis of why. The chapter uses a sample of the 17 most expensive Research Infrastructures listed on ESFRI roadmaps, complemented by an in-depth case study of the neutron facility European Spallation Source currently under construction in Lund, Sweden to investigate this matter, important for both policymaking and scholarly research.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Alvehus, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Institutional Logics and Functionalist Differentiation Theory: Challenges and pathways forward
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Organization Theory. - : SAGE Publications. - 2631-7877. ; 3:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- As a theoretical framework in organization studies, institutional logics is immensely popular. It has been used in a large amount of highly contributory and enlightening empirical studies, and developed far beyond its original formulation in a classical paper by Friedland and Alford (1991). In our paper, we identify three key theoretical problems that have emerged in the development and use of institutional logics theory in the past three decades: the lack of uniformity and coherence in the definitions and empirical identifications of logics; the tendency of institutional logics theorists to attempt to build grand theory to connect micro, meso, and macro levels of analysis; and the difficulties to explain how institutional logics are reproduced and how institutional logics interrelate and evolve over time. To address these issues, we highlight the similarities between institutional logics theory and classical functionalist differentiation theory, drawing its legacy from Max Weber, Talcott Parsons, and Robert Merton, and propose its use as a resource in further theoretical development. The aim of the paper is not to reject institutional logics theory, or merely to point out its weaknesses, but to demonstrate how a revival of some classics in sociological theory can be used to sharpen institutional logics as an analytical tool and thus assist in efforts to further improve the usefulness of institutional logics as a theoretical framework in organization studies.
|
|
| 8. |
- Bergh, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Enhetslösningarnas tyranni
- 2021
-
Bok (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Storskalighet, centralism och likriktning. Enhetslösningarnas tyranni breder ut sig i det moderna samhället, från storföretaget till den statliga byråkratin. Men vill vi förstå – och kunna motverka – denna process måste vi söka oss bortom de vanliga uppdelningarna mellan vänster och höger och mellan stat och marknad.
|
|
| 9. |
-
Big Science and Research Infrastructures in Europe
- 2020
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This thought-provoking book expands on the notion that Big Science is not the only term to describe and investigate particularly large research projects, scientific collaborations and facilities. It investigates the significant overlap between Big Science and Research Infrastructures (RIs) in a European context since the early twenty-first century. Contributions to this innovative book not only augment the study of Big Science with new perspectives, but also launch the study of RIs as a promising new line of inquiry.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
