| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Blomberg, Staffan, et al.
(författare)
-
Barn och socialt arbete : Socialhögskolans årsbok 2019
- 2020
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Årsboken ger en inblick i delar av den forskning kring socialt arbete med barn som sker vid Socialhögskolan. Den ger också en kort introduktion till verksamheten vid Socialhögskolan.
|
|
| 3. |
- Lui Gallassi, Ada, et al.
(författare)
-
Sidestepping Rights: An Analysis of the Intersection of Human Rights Obligations and Their Practical Implications for Older Migrants
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Social Exclusion in Later Life : Interdisciplinary and Policy Perspectives - Interdisciplinary and Policy Perspectives. - Cham : Springer International Publishing. - 2197-585X .- 2197-5841. - 9783030514082 - 9783030514051 - 9783030514068 ; 28:1, s. 275-286
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Kapitlet lyfter fram frågan om mänskliga rättigheter i utvalda former och hur de påverkar migranters positioner. Ett svenskt exempel illustrerar de utmaningar som migranter står inför i termer av exkludering.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Sandén, Ulrika, et al.
(författare)
-
A perspective-taking university course for cancer survivors, loved ones and healthcare professionals
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Social Sciences & Humanities Open. - : Elsevier. - 2590-2911. ; 2024:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study reports the results of a university course aimed at exploring and improving cooperation in healthcare with both cancer survivors, loved ones and healthcare professionals as students.Central to the course was the understanding of and moving between each other's perspectives. Operating within a framework inspired by problem-based learning (PBL), small groups consisting of at least one cancer survivor, one loved one and one healthcare professional, collaboratively created scenarios based on their personal experiences. The students developed, elaborated, and identified problems and potential solutions. The pedagogical framing illustrated an empowering process of defining and elaborating a problem of their combined concerns, using their different knowledge. Although cooperation presented challenges, most students were able to explore and appreciate each other's perspectives when provided with a safe environment. Our experiences highlight the importance of both contextual safety and personal development as key factors in addressing power imbalances in healthcare.
|
|
| 6. |
- Sandén, Ulrika, et al.
(författare)
-
Breaking the patientification process - through co-creation of care, using old arctic survival knowledge
- 2021
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1748-2631 .- 1748-2623. ; 16:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Cancer research and connected innovation processes often lack a major component; patient participation. We revisit three studies (a-c) in order to explore how Momentary contentment theory may be used to improve patient participation and psychosocial health.Method: We revisited data from the initial (a) classic grounded theory study on Momentary contentment, based on four years of observation and 14 interviews. It explains a way of dealing with life close to death and morbidity. In the imminence of danger the studied culture resembles the context of cancer patients. The two following studies used focus group interviews with (b) 19 cancer patients and (c) 17 relatives of cancer patients in southern Sweden.Results: We suggest a process where cancer patients are taught to be submissive and that the support they receive from health providers may be counterproductive to contentment; a patientification process. We present alternative ways for people to handle issues such as hope, waiting, knowledge gaps and healthcare navigation while living with cancer. We introduce an alternative to patientification and passive patients where active patients create their own safety and truly participates in their care. Conclusions: We propose clinical studies to introduce such a shift from patentification to co-creation of care.
|
|
| 7. |
- Thulesius, Hans, et al.
(författare)
-
Pluralistic retasking. Re-thinking cancer diagnostics from a primary care physician perspective. A grounded theory study.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Core values of family medicine: Threats and opportunities. - : WONCA.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundCancer diagnostics is heterogeneous depending on disease type, age, gender, socioeconomical and geographical contexts of patients and caregivers.QuestionsHow could cancer be diagnosed in a more timely way from a primary care perspective?MethodsData from 1752 primary care physician (PCP) respondents in 20 countries and 20 Spanish and 7 Swedish PCP interviewees 2013-2019 analysed with classic grounded theory, especially free text responses to “How do you think the speed of diagnosis of cancer in primary care could be improved?”. Secondary analysis of interviews and literature. OutcomesWe call PCP's ideas on improved cancer work-up pluralistic retasking: task shifting among physicians, nurses, assistants and secretaries involving task redistribution, task sharing, task collaboration, changing tasks – cancer fast tracks or cancer screening instead of cancer case finding when appropriate. Cognitive retasking involves both slow rational thinking in algorithms and fast intuitive thinking through gut feelings. Digital retasking bridges time and place by eHealth to reduce “elsewhereism” of experts and power symmetry issues between patient/caregiver. Shrinking gaps between and amongst patients and caregivers requires care restructuring and reallocation of funds. Care refinancing is thus necessary to improve diagnostic timeliness. Good cancer diagnostics needs good time management. Not too early (to avoid overdiagnosis) and never too late.DiscussionPluralistic retasking is a conceptual summary of multiple strategies needed to optimise the timeliness of cancer diagnostics.Take Home Message for PracticeCan I do something differently to diagnose cancer in a more timely way?
|
|
| 8. |
- Thulesius, Hans, et al.
(författare)
-
Pluralistic task shifting for a more timely cancer diagnosis. A grounded theory study from a primary care perspective
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. - : Taylor & Francis Group. - 0281-3432 .- 1502-7724. ; 39:4, s. 486-497
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective To explore how cancer could be diagnosed in a more timely way. Design Grounded theory analysis of primary care physicians' free text survey responses to: 'How do you think the speed of diagnosis of cancer in primary care could be improved?'. Secondary analysis of primary care physician interviews, survey responses, literature. Setting Primary care in 20 European orenas Research Group countries. Subjects Primary care physicians: 1352 survey respondents (2013-2016), 20 Spanish and 7 Swedish interviewees (2015-2019). Main outcome measures Conceptual explanation of how to improve timeliness of cancer diagnosis. Results Pluralistic task shifting is a grounded theory of a composite strategy. It includes task sharing - among nurses, physicians, nurse assistants, secretaries, and patients - and changing tasks with cancer screening when appropriate or cancer fast-tracks to accelerate cancer case finding. A pluralistic dialogue culture of comprehensive collaboration and task redistribution is required for effective pluralistic task shifting. Pluralistic task shifting relies on cognitive task shifting, which includes learning more about slow analytic reasoning and fast automatic thinking initiated by pattern recognition; and digital task shifting, which by use of eHealth and telemedicine bridges time and place and improves power symmetry between patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Financial task shifting that involves cost tracking followed by reallocation of funds is necessary for the restructuring and retraining required for successful pluralistic task shifting. A timely diagnosis reduces expensive investigations and waiting times. Also, late-stage cancers are costlier to treat than early-stage cancers. Timing is central to cancer diagnosis: not too early to avoid overdiagnosis, and never too late. Conclusions We present pluralistic task shifting as a conceptual summary of strategies needed to optimise the timeliness of cancer diagnosis.
|
|
