| 1. |
- Berbres, Malin, et al.
(författare)
-
Women's use of Swedish health care during the postpartum period in relation to maternal country of birth-A population-based study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. - 0001-6349 .- 1600-0412.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Migrant women are a heterogenous group with both higher and lower risk for pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes compared with women in the receiving countries. This study aimed to investigate women's use of Swedish healthcare postpartum, in terms of hospital stay >48 h, readmission to hospital, and specialized out-patient clinic visits, in relation to maternal country of birth.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based register study including 278 219 primiparous and 367 776 multiparous women in Sweden (2014-2019) using data from Swedish Pregnancy Register, National Patient Register and Statistics Sweden. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate associations between maternal country of birth and outcomes, adjusting for year of birth, maternal age, education, pre-gestational hypertension and diabetes, and healthcare region, presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) with Swedish-born women as reference.RESULTS: Subgroups of migrant women had higher odds of postpartum hospital stays > 48 h, particularly women from Eritrea (primiparous aOR 2.80, CI 2.49-3.15; multiparous aOR 2.78, CI 2.59-2.98), Somalia (primiparous aOR 2.61, CI 2.34-2.92; multiparous aOR 1.87, CI 1.79-1.97), and India (primiparous aOR 2.52, CI 2.14-2.97; multiparous aOR 2.61, CI 2.33-2.93), compared to Swedish-born women. Primiparous women from Afghanistan (aOR 1.32, CI 1.08-1.6), Iraq (aOR 1.30, CI 1.16-1.46), and Iran (aOR 1.23, CI 1.04-1.45) had slightly higher odds of hospital readmission, along with multiparous women from India (aOR 1.34, CI 1.02-1.76) and Somalia (aOR 1.24, CI 1.11-1.38). Specialized out-patient clinic visits were most common in primiparous women from Somalia (aOR 1.47, CI 1.35-1.59), Iran (aOR 1.31, CI 1.22-1.42) and Afghanistan (aOR 1.31, CI 1.18-1.46), and in multiparous women from Iran (aOR 1.30, CI 1.20-1.41) and Iraq (aOR 1.15, CI 1.11-1.20), however less common in women from some other countries.CONCLUSIONS: The use of Swedish health care during the postpartum period varied among women, depending on their country of birth. Women from certain countries had particularly high odds of postpartum hospital stays exceeding 48 h, compared to Swedish-born women, regardless of parity and pre-gestational medical disorders. Further studies are needed to determine whether the individual needs of migrant women are being met during the postpartum period or not.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bergendahl, Sandra, et al.
(författare)
-
Lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy in vacuum assisted delivery in nulliparous women (EVA) : multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial
- 2024
-
Ingår i: BMJ (Clinical research ed.). - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 1756-1833. ; 385
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of lateral episiotomy, compared with no episiotomy, on obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous women requiring vacuum extraction.DESIGN: A multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.SETTING: Eight hospitals in Sweden, 2017-23.PARTICIPANTS: 717 nulliparous women with a single live fetus of 34 gestational weeks or more, requiring vacuum extraction were randomly assigned (1:1) to lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy using sealed opaque envelopes. Randomisation was stratified by study site.INTERVENTION: A standardised lateral episiotomy was performed during the vacuum extraction, at crowning of the fetal head, starting 1-3 cm from the posterior fourchette, at a 60° (45-80°) angle from the midline, and 4 cm (3-5 cm) long. The comparison was no episiotomy unless considered indispensable.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the episiotomy in vacuum assisted delivery (EVA) trial was obstetric anal sphincter injury, clinically diagnosed by combined visual inspection and digital rectal and vaginal examination. The primary analysis used a modified intention-to-treat population that included all consenting women with attempted or successful vacuum extraction. As a result of an interim analysis at significance level P<0.01, the primary endpoint was tested at 4% significance level with accompanying 96% confidence interval (CI).RESULTS: From 1 July 2017 to 15 February 2023, 717 women were randomly assigned: 354 (49%) to lateral episiotomy and 363 (51%) to no episiotomy. Before vacuum extraction attempt, one woman withdrew consent and 14 had a spontaneous birth, leaving 702 for the primary analysis. In the intervention group, 21 (6%) of 344 women sustained obstetric anal sphincter injury, compared with 47 (13%) of 358 women in the comparison group (P=0.002). The risk difference was -7.0% (96% CI -11.7% to -2.5%). The risk ratio adjusted for site was 0.47 (96% CI 0.23 to 0.97) and unadjusted risk ratio was 0.46 (0.28 to 0.78). No significant differences were noted between groups in postpartum pain, blood loss, neonatal outcomes, or total adverse events, but the intervention group had more wound infections and dehiscence.CONCLUSIONS: Lateral episiotomy can be recommended for nulliparous women requiring vacuum extraction to significantly reduce the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02643108.
|
|
