| 1. |
- Dickstein, Yaakov, et al.
(författare)
-
Colistin Resistance Development Following Colistin-Meropenem Combination Therapy Versus Colistin Monotherapy in Patients With Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Clinical Infectious Diseases. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1058-4838 .- 1537-6591. ; 71:10, s. 2599-2607
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether carbapenem-colistin combination therapy given to patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms reduces the emergence of colistin resistance compared to colistin monotherapy.METHODS: This is a pre-planned analysis of a secondary outcome from a randomized controlled trial comparing colistin monotherapy with colistin-meropenem combination for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant, colistin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria. We evaluated rectal swabs taken on day 7 from enrollment or later for the presence of new colistin-resistant (ColR) isolates. We evaluated the emergence of any ColR isolate and the emergence of ColR Enterobacteriaceae (ColR-E).RESULTS: Data were available for 214 patients for the primary analysis; emergent ColR organisms were detected in 22 (10.3%). No difference was observed between patients randomized to treatment with colistin monotherapy (10/106, 9.4%) vs. patients randomized to colistin-meropenem combination therapy (12/108, 11.1%), p=0.669. ColR-E organisms were detected in 18/249 (7.2%) patients available for analysis. No difference was observed between the two treatment arms (colistin monotherapy 6/128 [4.7%] vs. combination therapy 12/121 [9.9%], p=0.111). Enterobacteriaceae as the index isolate was found to be associated with development of ColR-E (HR 3.875 95% CI 1.475-10.184, p=0.006).CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem-colistin combination therapy did not reduce the incidence of colistin resistance emergence in patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant organisms. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the development of colistin resistance and methods for its prevention.
|
|
| 2. |
- Nutman, Amir, et al.
(författare)
-
Colistin plus meropenem for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections : in vitro synergism is not associated with better clinical outcomes
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Clinical Microbiology and Infection. - : Elsevier BV. - 1198-743X .- 1469-0691. ; 26:9, s. 1185-1191
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- ObjectivesIn vitro models showing synergism between polymyxins and carbapenems support combination treatment for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CRGN) infections. We tested the association between the presence of in vitro synergism and clinical outcomes in patients treated with colistin plus meropenem.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of AIDA, a randomized controlled trial comparing colistin with colistin–meropenem for severe CRGN infections. We tested in vitro synergism using a checkerboard assay. Based on the fractional inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC) index for each colistin–meropenem combination, we categorized results as synergistic, antagonistic or additive/indifferent. The primary outcome was clinical failure at 14 days. Secondary outcomes were 14- and 28-day mortality and microbiological failure.ResultsThe sample included 171 patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 131), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 37) and Pseudomonas aeuruginosa (n = 3). In vitro testing showed synergism for 73 isolates, antagonism for 20 and additivism/indifference for 78. In patients who received any colistin plus meropenem, clinical failure at 14 days was 59/78 (75.6%) in the additivism/indifference group (reference category), 54/73 (74.0%) in the synergism group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.31–1.83), and 11/20 (55%) in the antagonism group (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.22–2.73). There was no significant difference between groups for any secondary outcome. Comparing the synergism group to patients treated with colistin monotherapy, synergism was not protective against 14-day clinical failure (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26–1.04) or 14-day mortality (aOR1.09, 95% CI 0.60–1.96).DiscussionIn vitro synergism between colistin and meropenem via checkerboard method did not translate into clinical benefit.
|
|
