| 1. |
- Akselsson, Roland, et al.
(författare)
-
Multidisciplinary Research on Integration of Human Factors and Production Concepts such as TQM - A Participatory Discussion Session
- 1999
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the Conference on TQM and Human Factors. - 9172195207 ; 2, s. 439-448
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- A discussion session where the conference participants are invited to participate is planned. One topic for the session is to discuss experiences of multidisciplinary research on integration of human factors and different production concepts applied in change processes within Swedish companies. An important question that the discussion will focus on is: How to get high quality in multidisciplinary research? Another topic is to discuss how people from different disciplines in the companies interact with each other and with the researchers. Researchers from the centre Change@Work at Lund University in Sweden will present some of their experiences from several years of multidisciplinary research in companies. As a background the research questions within Change@Work are presented below. Discussions during the workshop will be performed according to methods used by the researchers in their research in the companies. All discussion will be documented and later sent to all workshop participants.
|
|
| 2. |
- Birznieks, Ingvars, et al.
(författare)
-
Mechanisms for force adjustments to unpredictable frictional changes at individual digits during two-fingered manipulation.
- 1998
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neurophysiology. - 0022-3077 .- 1522-1598. ; 80:4, s. 1989-2002
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Previous studies on adaptation of fingertip forces to local friction at individual digit-object interfaces largely focused on static phases of manipulative tasks in which humans could rely on anticipatory control based on the friction in previous trials. Here we instead analyze mechanisms underlying this adaptation after unpredictable changes in local friction between consecutive trials. With the tips of the right index and middle fingers or the right and left index fingers, subjects restrained a manipulandum whose horizontal contact surfaces were located side by side. At unpredictable moments a tangential force was applied to the contact surfaces in the distal direction at 16 N/s to a plateau at 4 N. The subjects were free to use any combination of normal and tangential forces at the two fingers, but the sum of the tangential forces had to counterbalance the imposed load. The contact surface of the right index finger was fine-grained sandpaper, whereas that of the cooperating finger was changed between sandpaper and the more slippery rayon. The load increase automatically triggered normal force responses at both fingers. When a finger contacted rayon, subjects allowed slips to occur at this finger during the load force increase instead of elevating the normal force. These slips accounted for a partitioning of the load force between the digits that resulted in an adequate adjustment of the normal:tangential force ratios to the local friction at each digit. This mechanism required a fine control of the normal forces. Although the normal force at the more slippery surface had to be comparatively low to allow slippage, the normal forces applied by the nonslipping digit at the same time had to be high enough to prevent loss of the manipulandum. The frictional changes influenced the normal forces applied before the load ramp as well as the size of the triggered normal force responses similarly at both fingers, that is, with rayon at one contact surface the normal forces increased at both fingers. Thus to independently adapt fingertip forces to the local friction the normal forces were controlled at an interdigital level by using sensory information from both engaged digits. Furthermore, subjects used both short- and long-term anticipatory mechanisms in a manner consistent with the notion that the central nervous system (CNS) entertains internal models of relevant object and task properties during manipulation.
|
|
| 3. |
- Burstedt, Magnus K, et al.
(författare)
-
Control of forces applied by individual fingers engaged in restraint of an active object.
- 1997
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neurophysiology. - 0022-3077 .- 1522-1598. ; 78:1, s. 117-128
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We investigated the coordination of fingertip forces in subjects who used the tips of two fingers to restrain an instrumented manipulandum with horizontally oriented grip surfaces. The grip surfaces were subjected to tangential pulling forces in the distal direction in relation to the fingers. The subjects used either the right index and middle fingers (unimanual grasp) or both index fingers (bimanual grasp) to restrain the manipulandum. To change the frictional condition at the digit-object interfaces, either both grip surfaces were covered with sandpaper or one was covered with sandpaper and the other with rayon. The forces applied normally and tangentially to the grip surfaces were measured separately at each plate along with the position of the plates. Subjects could have performed the present task successfully with many different force distributions between the digits. However, they partitioned the load in a manner that reflected the frictional condition at the local digit-object interfaces. When both digits contacted sandpaper, they typically partitioned the load symmetrically, but when one digit made contact with rayon and the other with sandpaper, the digit contacting the less slippery material (sandpaper) took up a larger part of the load. The normal forces were also influenced by the frictional condition, but they reflected the average friction at the two contact sites rather than the local friction. That is, when friction was low at one of the digit-object interfaces, only the applied normal forces increased at both digits. Thus sensory information related to the local frictional condition at the respective digit-object interfaces controlled the normal force at both digits. The normal:tangential force ratio at each digit appeared to be a controlled variable. It was adjusted independently at each digit to the minimum ratio required to prevent frictional slippage, keeping an adequate safety margin against slippage. This was accomplished by the scaling of the normal forces to the average friction and by partitioning of the load according to frictional differences between the digit-object interfaces. In conclusion, by adjusting the normal:tangential force ratios to the local frictional condition, subjects avoided excessive normal forces at the individual digit-object interfaces, and by partitioning the load according the frictional difference, subjects avoided high normal forces. Thus the local frictional condition at the separate digit-object interfaces is one factor that can strongly influence the distribution of forces across digits engaged in a manipulative act.
|
|
| 4. |
- Burstedt, Magnus K, et al.
(författare)
-
Coordination of fingertip forces during human manipulation can emerge from independent neural networks controlling each engaged digit.
- 1997
-
Ingår i: Experimental Brain Research. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0014-4819 .- 1432-1106. ; 117:1, s. 67-79
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We investigated the coordination of fingertip forces in subjects who lifted an object (i) using the index finger and thumb of their right hand, (ii) using their left and right index fingers, and (iii) cooperatively with another subject using the right index finger. The forces applied normal and tangential to the two parallel grip surfaces of the test object and the vertical movement of the object were recorded. The friction between the object and the digits was varied independently at each surface between blocks of trials by changing the materials covering the grip surfaces. The object's weight and surface materials were held constant across consecutive trials. The performance was remarkably similar whether the task was shared by two subjects or carried out unimanually or bimanually by a single subject. The local friction was the main factor determining the normal:tangential force ratio employed at each digit-object interface. Irrespective of grasp configuration, the subjects adapted the force ratios to the local frictional conditions such that they maintained adequate safety margins against slips at each of the engaged digits during the various phases of the lifting task. Importantly, the observed force adjustments were not obligatory mechanical consequences of the task. In all three grasp configurations an incidental slip at one of the digits elicited a normal force increase at both engaged digits such that the normal:tangential force ratio was restored at the non-slipping digit and increased at the slipping digit. The initial development of the fingertip forces prior to object lift-off revealed that the subjects employed digit-specific anticipatory mechanisms using weight and frictional experiences in the previous trial. Because grasp stability was accomplished in a similar manner whether the task was carried out by one subject or cooperatively by two subjects, it was concluded that anticipatory adjustments of the fingertip forces can emerge from the action of anatomically independent neural networks controlling each engaged digit. In contrast, important aspects of the temporal coordination of the digits was organized by a "higher level" sensory-based control that influenced both digits. In lifts by single subjects this control was mast probably based on tactile and visual input and on communication between neural control mechanisms associated with each digit. In the two-subject grasp configuration this synchronization information was based on auditory and visual cues.
|
|
| 5. |
- Häger-Ross, Charlotte, et al.
(författare)
-
Grip-force responses to unanticipated object loading : load direction reveals body- and gravity-referenced intrinsic task variables
- 1996
-
Ingår i: Experimental Brain Research. - : Springer. - 0014-4819 .- 1432-1106. ; 110:1, s. 142-150
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Humans preserve grasp stability by automatically regulating the grip forces when loads are applied tangentially to the grip surfaces of a manipulandum held in a precision grip. The effects of the direction of the load force in relation to the palm, trunk, and gravity were investigated in blindfolded subjects. Controlled, tangential load-forces were delivered in an unpredictable manner to the grip surface in contact with the index finger either in the distal and proximal directions (away from and toward the palm) or in the ulnar and radial directions (transverse to the palm). The hand was oriented in: (1) a standard position, with the forearm extended horizontally and anteriorly in intermediate pronosupination; (2) an inverted position, reversing the direction of radial and ulnar loads in relation to gravity; and (3) a horizontally rotated position, in which distal loads were directed toward the trunk. The amplitude of the grip-force responses (perpendicular to the grip surface) varied with the direction of load in a manner reflecting frictional anisotropies at the digit-object interface; that is, the subjects automatically scaled the grip responses to provide similar safety margins against frictional slips. For all hand positions, the time from onset of load increase to start of the grip-force increase was shorter for distal loads, which tended to pull the object out of the hand, than for proximal loads. Furthermore, this latency was shorter for loads in the direction of gravity, regardless of hand position. Thus, shorter latencies were observed when frictional forces alone opposed the load, while longer latencies occurred when gravity also opposed the load or when the more proximal parts of the digits and palm were positioned in the path of the load. These latency effects were due to different processing delays in the central nervous system and may reflect the preparation of a default response in certain critical directions. The response to loads in other directions would incur delays required to implement a new frictional scaling and a different muscle activation pattern to counteract the load forces. We conclude that load direction, referenced to gravity and to the hand's geometry, represents intrinsic task variables in the automatic processes that maintain a stable grasp on objects subjected to unpredictable load forces. In contrast, the grip-force safety margin against frictional slips did not vary systematically with respect to these task variables. Instead, the magnitude of the grip-force responses varied across load direction and hand orientation according to frictional differences providing similar safety margins supporting grasp stability.
|
|
| 6. |
- Häger-Ross, Charlotte, et al.
(författare)
-
Nondigital afferent input in reactive control of fingertip forces during precision grip
- 1996
-
Ingår i: Experimental Brain Research. - : Springer. - 0014-4819 .- 1432-1106. ; 110:1, s. 131-141
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Sensory inputs from the digits are important in initiating and scaling automatic reactive grip responses that help prevent frictional slips when grasped objects are subjected to destabilizing load forces. In the present study we analyzed the contribution to grip-force control from mechanoreceptors located proximal to the digits when subjects held a small manipulandum between the tips of the thumb and index finger. Loads of various controlled amplitudes and rates were delivered tangential to the grip surfaces at unpredictable times. Grip forces (normal to the grip surfaces) and the position of the manipulandum were recorded. In addition, movements of hand and arm segments were assessed by recording the position of markers placed at critical points. Subjects performed test series during normal digital sensibility and during local anesthesia of the index finger and thumb. To grade the size of movements of tissues proximal to the digits caused by the loadings, three different conditions of arm and hand support were used; (1) in the hand-support condition the subjects used the three ulnar fingers to grasp a vertical dowel support and the forearm was supported in a vacuum cast; (2) in the forearm-support condition only the forearm was supported; finally, (3) in the no-support condition the arm was free. With normal digital sensibility the size of the movements proximal to the digits had small effects on the grip-force control. In contrast, the grip control was markedly influenced by the extent of such movements during digital anesthesia. The poorest control was observed in the hand-support condition, allowing essentially only digital movements. The grip responses were either absent or attenuated, with greatly prolonged onset latencies. In the forearm and no-support conditions, when marked wrist movements took place, both the frequency and the strength of grip-force responses were higher, and the grip response latencies were shorter. However, the performance never approached normal. It is concluded that sensory inputs from the digits are dominant in reactive grip control. However, nondigital sensory input may be used for some grip control during impaired digital sensibility. Furthermore, the quality of the control during impaired sensibility depends on the extent of movements evoked by the load in the distal, unanesthetized parts of the arm. The origin of these useful sensory signals is discussed.
|
|
| 7. |
- Häger Ross, Charlotte, 1962-
(författare)
-
To grip and not to slip : sensorimotor mechanisms in reactive control of grasp stability
- 1995
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The reactive control of fingertip forces maintaining grasp stability was examined in man during a prehensile task. Blindfolded subjects used the precision grip between the tips of index finger and thumb to restrain an object that was subjected to unpredictable load forces. These were delivered tangential to the parallel grip surfaces of the object. Load forces, grip forces (perpendicular to the grip surfaces) and position of the object were recorded.Subjects automatically adjusted the grip forces to loads of various amplitudes and rates. Thereby they maintained a reliable safety margin against frictional slips without using excessive grip forces. A rapid rise in grip force lasting about 0.2 s was triggered after a short delay following the onset of a sustained ramp load increase. This 'catch-up' response caused a quick restoration of an adequate grip:load force ratio that prevented frictional slips. If the ramp load continued to increase after the catchup response, the grip force also increased in parallel with the load change in a 'tracking' manner. Consequently, during the hold phases of 'ramp-and-hold' loads, the employed grip forces were approximately proportional to the load amplitude. Sensory information about the rate of change of the load force parametrically scaled the 'catchup' and 'tracking' responses.Following anesthetic block of sensory input from the digits, the grip responses were both delayed and attenuated or even abolished. To compensate for these impairments, subjects had to voluntarily maintain exceedingly high grip forces to prevent the object from slipping. The grip control improved slightly during hand and forearm support conditions that allowed marked wrist movements to occur in response to the loading. This indicates that signals from receptors in muscles, joints or skin areas proximal to the digits can to some extent be used to adjust grip forces during impaired digital sensibility. In contrast, these signals had only minor influence on the control during normal digital sensibility.Grip responses to loads delivered in various directions revealed that the load direction, in relation to gravity and to the hand's geometry, represents intrinsic task variables in the automatic processes that maintain a stable grasp. The load direction influenced both the response latencies and the magnitudes of the grip responses. The response latencies were shortest for loads in directions that were the most critical with regard to the consequences of frictional slippage, i.e., loads directed away from the palm or in the direction of gravity. Recordings of signals in cutaneous afferents innervating the finger tips demonstrated that these effects on the response latencies depended on differences in the time needed by the central nervous system to implement the motor responses. The short latencies in the most ‘criticar load directions may reflect the preparation of a default response, while additional central processing would be needed to execute the response to loads in other directions. Adjustments to local frictional anisotropies at the digit-object interface largely explained the magnitude effects.In conclusion, grip responses are automatically adjusted to the current loading condition during unpredictable loading of a hand held object. Subjects call up a previously acquired sensorimotor transform that supports grasp stability by preventing both object slippage and excessive grip forces. Cutaneous sensory information about tangential forces and frictional conditions at the digit-object interface is used to initiate and scale the grip responses to the current loading conditions, largely in a predictive manner.
|
|
| 8. |
- Macefield, Vaughan G, et al.
(författare)
-
Control of grip force during restraint of an object held between finger and thumb : responses of cutaneous afferents from the digits
- 1996
-
Ingår i: Experimental Brain Research. - 0014-4819 .- 1432-1106. ; 108:1, s. 155-171
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Unexpected pulling and pushing loads exerted by an object held with a precision grip evoke automatic and graded increases in the grip force (normal to the grip surfaces) that prevent escape of the object; unloading elicits a decrease in grip force. Anesthesia of the digital nerves has shown that these grip reactions depend on sensory signals from the digits. In the present study we assessed the capacity of tactile afferents from the digits to trigger and scale the evoked grip responses. Using tungsten microelectrodes inserted percutaneously into the median nerve of awake human subjects, unitary recordings were made from ten FA I and 13 FA II rapidly adapting afferents, and 12 SA I and 18 SA II slowly adapting afferents. While the subject held a manipulandum between a finger and the thumb, tangential load forces were applied to the receptor-bearing digit (index, middle, or ring finger or thumb) as trapezoidal load-force profiles with a plateau amplitude of 0.5-2.0 N and rates of loading and unloading at 2-8 N/s, or as "step-loads" of 0.5 N delivered at 32 N/s. Such load trials were delivered in both the distal (pulling) and proximal (pushing) direction. FA I afferents responded consistently to the load forces, being recruited during the loading and unloading phases. During the loading ramp the ensemble discharge of the FA I afferents reflected the first time-derivative of the load force (i.e., the load-force rate). These afferents were relatively insensitive to the subject's grip force responses. However, high static finger forces appeared to suppress excitation of these afferents during the unloading phase. The FA II afferents were largely insensitive to the load trials: only with the step-loads did some afferents respond. Both classes of SA afferents were sensitive to load force and grip force, and discharge rates were graded by the rate of loading. The firing of the SA I afferents appeared to be relatively more influenced by the subject's grip-force response than the discharge of the SA II afferents, which were more influenced by the load-force stimulus. The direction in which the tangential load force was applied to the skin influenced the firing of most afferents and in particular the SA II afferents. Individual afferents within each class (except for the FA IIs) responded to the loading ramp before the onset of the subject's grip response and may thus be responsible for initiating the automatic increase in grip force. However, nearly half of the FA I afferents recruited by the load trials responded to the loading phase early enough to trigger the subject's grip-force response, whereas only ca. one-fifth of the SA Is and SA IIs did so. These observations, together with the high density of FA I receptors in the digits, might place the FA I afferents in a unique position to convey the information required to initiate and scale the reactive grip-force responses to the imposed load forces.
|
|
