↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Johnson Reed M) srt2:(2020-2024)"

Search: WFRF:(Johnson Reed M) > (2020-2024)

Result 1-6 of 6

Sort/group result

Sort by: Hits per page:

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Niemi, MEK, et al. (author) 2021 swepub:Mat__t
2.	2021 swepub:Mat__t
3.	Kanai, M, et al. (author) 2023 swepub:Mat__t
4.	Moradi, Sara, 1981, et al. (author) Global scaling of the heat transport in fusion plasmas 2020 In: Physical Review Research. - 2643-1564. ; 2:1 Journal article (peer-reviewed)
5.	Coleman, E, et al. (author) Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 2022 In: International journal of transgender health. - : Informa UK Limited. - 2689-5277 .- 2689-5269. ; 23:Suppl 1, s. S1-S258 Journal article (peer-reviewed)
6.	Reed, Julie, et al. (author) Quality of locally designed surveys in a quality improvement collaborative : review of survey validity and identification of common errors 2024 In: BMJ Open Quality. - London : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2399-6641. ; 13 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract Objective: Surveys are a commonly used tool in quality improvement (QI) projects, but little is known about the standards to which they are designed and applied. We aimed to investigate the quality of surveys used within a QI collaborative, and to characterise the common errors made in survey design.Methods: Five reviewers (two research methodology and QI, three clinical and QI experts) independently assessed 20 surveys, comprising 250 survey items, that were developed in a North American cystic fibrosis lung transplant transition collaborative. Content Validity Index (CVI) scores were calculated for each survey. Reviewer consensus discussions decided an overall quality assessment for each survey and survey item (analysed using descriptive statistics) and explored the rationale for scoring (using qualitative thematic analysis).Results: 3/20 surveys scored as high quality (CVI >80%). 19% (n=47) of survey items were recommended by the reviewers, with 35% (n=87) requiring improvements, and 46% (n=116) not recommended. Quality assessment criteria were agreed upon. Types of common errors identified included the ethics and appropriateness of questions and survey format; usefulness of survey items to inform learning or lead to action, and methodological issues with survey questions, survey response options; and overall survey design.Conclusion: Survey development is a task that requires careful consideration, time and expertise. QI teams should consider whether a survey is the most appropriate form for capturing information during the improvement process. There is a need to educate and support QI teams to adhere to good practice and avoid common errors, thereby increasing the value of surveys for evaluation and QI. The methodology, quality assessment criteria and common errors described in this paper can provide a useful resource for this purpose. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka

Permalink

Result 1-6 of 6

Refine your search

Type of publication: journal article (3)

Type of content: peer-reviewed (3)

Author/Editor: Thomas, J. (4); Patel, A (4); Shaw, R (4); Clark, A. (3); Lewis, A. (3); Walker, R. (3); show more...; Davies, E. (3); Haider, S. (3); Gupta, A. (3); Smith, M. (3); Martin, J. (3); Davies, G (3); Brown, A. (3); Brown, E. (3); Clark, M. (3); Jones, M. (3); Davies, R (3); Hussain, S. (3); Jones, R. (3); Lee, S (3); Williams, M (3); Thomas, E. (3); Green, J. (3); Ali, S (3); Biondi, A (3); Khan, M (3); Burton, M. (3); Knight, A. (3); Murphy, S. (3); Ali, A. (3); Davies, C (3); Durand, M (3); Johnson, R (3); Wright, J (3); Wang, B. (3); Martin, T. (3); Smith, L (3); Harris, J. (3); Jones, S. (3); Smith, J. (3); King, D. (3); Ahmed, A (3); Murphy, C (3); Gori, A (3); Morris, A (3); Patel, K (3); Patel, M (3); Findlay, L (3); Price, C (3); Thomas, A (3); show less...

University: Karolinska Institutet (3); Royal Institute of Technology (1); Halmstad University (1); Chalmers University of Technology (1)

Language: English (6)

Research subject (UKÄ/SCB): Natural sciences (1); Engineering and Technology (1); Medical and Health Sciences (1)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

Copyright © LIBRIS - National Library Systems
LIBRIS.kb.se

pil uppåt

Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view