SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Johnsson Åse Allansdotter 1966) srt2:(2010-2014)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Johnsson Åse Allansdotter 1966) > (2010-2014)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 28
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Ásgeirsdóttir, Helga, et al. (författare)
  • Depiction of anatomic structures of relevance for scoring of cystic fibrosis changes by chest tomosynthesis and computed tomography
  • 2014
  • Ingår i: Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 37th European Cystic Fibrosis Conference, 11-14 June 2014, Gothenburg, Sweden. ; 13:Suppl. 2
  • Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • Introduction: Chest radiography (CR) and computed tomography (CT) are commonly used for imaging of patients with cystic fibrosis, and scoring is applied to assess disease severity. Chest tomosynthesis (CTS) is a new imaging modality providing better anatomic visualization than CR at radiation doses and costs lower than CT. Objective: To compare visibility and size of anatomic structures of relevance for scoring in CTS and CT images. Methods: 21 adult patients with cystic fibrosis were examined both with CTS (VolumeRAD; GE Healthcare) and volumetric CT (LightSpeed Pro 16, LightSpeed VCT, Discovery CT750HD; GE healthcare and Somatom Definition, Siemens Medical Solutions). The average effective dose for a standard patient was 0.13 and 4.5 mSv for CTS and CT, respectively. Comparison of visibility and manual measurements of diameters of the central and peripheral bronchi and their accompanying artery, as well as bronchial wall thickness (BWT), were performed in a non-blinded fashion. Results: All central structures could be evaluated. Mean difference in diameter of central bronchi, accompanying artery and BWT between CTS and CT was −0.6 (SD 0.6), −0.7 (SD 0.7) and −0.4 (SD 0.2) mm, respectively. Peripheral structures were more difficult to assess by CTS. Peripheral bronchial diameter, BWT and diameter of accompanying artery could be assessed by CTS in 20, 15 and 4 cases, respectively and mean difference between measurements was −0.5 (SD 0.5), −0.3 (SD 0.3) and −0.4 (SD 0.4) mm, respectively. Conclusion: This study indicates that peripheral structures are more difficult to evaluate by CTS and that CTS slightly underestimate size of structures in comparison to CT
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  • Asplund, Sara, 1976, et al. (författare)
  • Extended analysis of the effect of learning with feedback on the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis
  • 2011
  • Ingår i: Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. - : SPIE. - 1605-7422. ; 7966
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • In chest tomosynthesis, low-dose projections collected over a limited angular range are used for reconstruction of section images of the chest, resulting in a reduction of disturbing anatomy at a moderate increase in radiation dose compared to chest radiography. In a previous study, we investigated the effects of learning with feedback on the detection of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis. Six observers with varying degrees of experience of chest tomosynthesis analyzed tomosynthesis cases for presence of pulmonary nodules. The cases were analyzed before and after learning with feedback. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was used as reference. The differences in performance between the two readings were calculated using the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC-2) as primary measure of detectability. Significant differences between the readings were found only for observers inexperienced in chest tomosynthesis. The purpose of the present study was to extend the statistical analysis of the results of the previous study, including JAFROC-1 analysis and FROC curves in the analysis. The results are consistent with the results of the previous study and, furthermore, JAFROC-1 gave lower p-values than JAFROC-2 for the observers who improved their performance after learning with feedback. © 2011 SPIE.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  • Asplund, Sara, 1976, et al. (författare)
  • Learning aspects and potential pitfalls regarding detection of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis and proposed related quality criteria.
  • 2011
  • Ingår i: Acta radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 1600-0455 .- 0284-1851. ; 52:5, s. 503-512
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background In chest tomosynthesis, low-dose projections collected over a limited angular range are used for reconstruction of an arbitrary number of section images of the chest, resulting in a moderately increased radiation dose compared to chest radiography. Purpose To investigate the effects of learning with feedback on the detection of pulmonary nodules for observers with varying experience of chest tomosynthesis, to identify pitfalls regarding detection of pulmonary nodules, and present suggestions for how to avoid them, and to adapt the European quality criteria for chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) to chest tomosynthesis. Material and Methods Six observers analyzed tomosynthesis cases for presence of nodules in a jackknife alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristics (JAFROC) study. CT was used as reference. The same tomosynthesis cases were analyzed before and after learning with feedback, which included a collective learning session. The difference in performance between the two readings was calculated using the JAFROC figure of merit as principal measure of detectability. Results Significant improvement in performance after learning with feedback was found only for observers inexperienced in tomosynthesis. At the collective learning session, localization of pleural and subpleural nodules or structures was identified as the main difficulty in analyzing tomosynthesis images. Conclusion The results indicate that inexperienced observers can reach a high level of performance regarding nodule detection in tomosynthesis after learning with feedback and that the main problem with chest tomosynthesis is related to the limited depth resolution.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  • Båth, Magnus, 1974, et al. (författare)
  • Chest tomosynthesis
  • 2014
  • Ingår i: Tomosynthesis Imaging. Ed. Stephen Glick. - Boca Raton : CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. - 9781439878705 ; , s. 189-197
  • Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
9.
  • Fisichella, Valeria A, 1974, et al. (författare)
  • Evaluation of image quality and lesion perception by human readers on 3D CT colonography: comparison of standard and low radiation dose
  • 2010
  • Ingår i: European Radiology. - 1432-1084. ; 20:3, s. 630-9
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • AIMS: We compared the prevalence of noise-related artefacts and lesion perception on three-dimensional (3D) CT colonography (CTC) at standard and low radiation doses. METHODS: Forty-eight patients underwent CTC (64 x 0.625 mm collimation; tube rotation time 0.5 s; automatic tube current modulation: standard dose 40-160 mA, low dose 10-50 mA). Low- and standard-dose acquisitions were performed in the supine position, one after the other. The presence of artefacts (cobblestone and snow artefacts, irregularly delineated folds) and the presence of polyps were evaluated by five radiologists on 3D images at standard dose, the original low dose and a modified low dose, i.e. after manipulation of opacity on 3D. RESULTS: The mean effective dose was 3.9 +/- 1.3 mSv at standard dose and 1.03 +/- 0.4 mSv at low dose. The number of images showing cobblestone artefacts and irregularly delineated folds at original and modified low doses was significantly higher than at standard dose (P < 0.0001). Most of the artefacts on modified low-dose images were mild. No significant difference in sensitivity between the dose levels was found for polyps >/=6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of the effective dose to 1 mSv significantly affects image quality on 3D CTC, but the perception of >/=6 mm lesions is not significantly impaired.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 28

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy