| 1. |
- Drevhammar, Thomas, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Delivered by Seven Ventilators Using Simulated Neonatal Breathing
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. - 1529-7535 .- 1947-3893. ; 14:4, s. E196-E201
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is an established treatment for respiratory distress in neonates. Most modern ventilators are able to provide NCPAP. There have been no large studies examining the properties of NCPAP delivered by ventilators. The aim of this study was to compare pressure stability and imposed work of breathing (iWOB) for NCPAP delivered by ventilators using simulated neonatal breathing. Design: Experimental in vitro study. Setting: Research laboratory in Sweden. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: Neonatal breathing was simulated using a mechanical lung simulator. Seven ventilators were tested at different CPAP levels using two breath profiles. Pressure stability and iWOB were determined. Results from three ventilators revealed that they provided a slight pressure support. For these ventilators, iWOB could not be calculated. There were large differences in pressure stability and iWOB between the tested ventilators. For simulations using the 3.4-kg breath profile, the pressure swings around the mean pressure were more than five times greater, and iWOB more than four times higher, for the system with the highest measured values compared with the system with the lowest. Overall, the Fabian ventilator was the most pressure stable system. Evita XL and SERVO-i were found more pressure stable than Fabian in some simulations. The results for iWOB were in accordance with pressure stability for systems that allowed determination of this variable. Conclusions: Some of the tested ventilators unexpectedly provided a minor degree of pressure support. In terms of pressure stability, we have not found any advantages of ventilators as a group compared with Bubble CPAP, Neopuff, and variable flow generators that were tested in our previous study. The variation between individual systems is great within both categories. The clinical importance of these findings needs further investigation.
|
|
| 2. |
- Drevhammar, Thomas, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of seven infant continuous positive airway pressure systems using simulated neonatal breathing
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. - 1529-7535 .- 1947-3893. ; 13:2, s. E113-E119
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Continuous positive airway pressure is an established treatment for respiratory distress in neonates. Continuous positive airway pressure has been applied to infants using an array of devices. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the characteristics of seven continuous positive airway pressure systems using simulated breath profiles from newborns. Design: Experimental in vitro study. Setting: Research laboratory in Sweden. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: In vitro simulation of spontaneous neonatal breathing was achieved with a mechanical lung model. Simulation included two breath profiles, three levels of continuous positive airway pressure with and without short binasal prongs and different levels of constant leak. Pressure stability and imposed work of breathing were determined. Seven continuous positive airway pressure systems were tested. There were large differences in pressure stability and imposed work of breathing between tested continuous positive airway pressure systems. Neopuff and Medijet had the highest pressure instability and imposed work of breathing. Benveniste, Hamilton Universal (Arabella), and Bubble continuous positive airway pressure showed intermediate results. AirLife and Infant Flow had the lowest pressure instability and imposed work of breathing. AirLife and Infant Flow showed the least decrease in delivered pressure when challenged with constant leak. Conclusion: The seven tested continuous positive airway pressure systems showed large variations in pressure stability and imposed work of breathing. They also showed large differences in how well they maintain continuous positive airway pressure when exposed to leak. For most systems, imposed work of breathing increased with increasing continuous positive airway pressure level. The clinical importance of the difference in pressure stability is uncertain. Our results may facilitate the design of clinical studies examining the effect of pressure stability on outcome.
|
|
