SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Kalashnikova M)
 

Search: WFRF:(Kalashnikova M) > (2020) > Recurrent versus fi...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Recurrent versus first cervical artery dissection - a retrospective study of clinical and vascular characteristics

Kloss, M. (author)
Kalashnikova, L. (author)
Dobrynina, L. (author)
show more...
Traenka, C. (author)
Engelter, S. T. (author)
Metso, T. M. (author)
Tatlisumak, Turgut (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology
Urbanek, C. (author)
Grau, A. (author)
Kellert, L. (author)
Brandt, T. (author)
Wieker, C. M. (author)
Grond-Ginsbach, C. (author)
Pezzini, A. (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2020-07-22
2020
English.
In: European Journal of Neurology. - : Wiley. - 1351-5101 .- 1468-1331. ; 27:11, s. 2185-2190
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background and purpose Most recurrent cervical artery dissection (CeAD) events occur shortly after the acute first CeAD. This study compared the characteristics of recurrent and first CeAD events and searched for associations between subsequent events of an individual person. Methods Cervical artery dissection patients with a new CeAD event occurring during a 3-6 month follow-up were retrospectively selected in seven specialized stroke centers. Clinical and vascular characteristics of the initial and the recurrent CeADs were compared. Results The study sample included 76 patients. Recurrent CeADs were occlusive in one (1.3%) patient, caused cerebral ischaemia in 13 (17.1%) and were asymptomatic in 39 (51.3%) patients, compared to 29 (38.2%) occlusive, 42 (55.3%) ischaemic and no asymptomatic first CeAD events. In 52 (68.4%) patients, recurrent dissections affected both internal carotid arteries or both vertebral arteries, whilst 24 (31.6%) patients had subsequent dissections in both types of artery. Twelve (28.6%) of 42 patients with an ischaemic first dissection had ischaemic symptoms due to the recurrent CeADs, too. However, only one (1.3%) of 34 patients with a non-ischaemic first CeAD suffered ischaemia upon recurrence. Conclusion Recurrent CeAD typically affects the same site of artery. It causes ischaemic events less often than the first CeAD. The risk that patients who presented with solely non-ischaemic symptoms of a first CeAD will have ischaemic symptoms in the case of a recurrent CeAD seems very small.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Neurovetenskaper (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Neurosciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

arterial dissection
epidemiology
cerebrovascular diseases and cerebral
circulation
cerebral infarction
stroke
endarterectomy
risk
Neurosciences & Neurology

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view