| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Aw, S T, et al.
(författare)
-
Individual semicircular canal function in superior and inferior vestibular neuritis
- 2001
-
Ingår i: Neurology. - 1526-632X. ; 57:5, s. 768-774
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To examine the concept of selective superior and inferior vestibular nerve involvement in vestibular neuritis by studying the distribution of semicircular canal (SCC) involvement in such patients. BACKGROUND: Vestibular neuritis was traditionally thought to involve the superior and inferior vestibular nerves. Recent work suggests that in some patients, only the superior nerve is involved. So far there are no reported cases of selective involvement of the inferior vestibular nerve. METHODS: The authors measured the vestibuloocular reflex from individual SCC at natural head accelerations using the head impulse test. The authors studied 33 patients with acute unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy, including 29 with classic vestibular neuritis and 4 with simultaneous ipsilateral hearing loss, 18 healthy subjects and 15 surgical unilateral vestibular deafferented patients. RESULTS: In patients with preserved hearing, eight had deficits in all three SCC, suggesting involvement of the superior and inferior vestibular nerves. Twenty-one had a lateral SCC deficit or a combined lateral and anterior SCC deficit consistent with selective involvement of the superior vestibular nerve. Two patients with ipsilateral hearing loss had normal caloric responses and an isolated posterior SCC deficit on impulsive testing. The authors propose that these two patients had a selective loss of inferior vestibular nerve function. CONCLUSION: Vestibular neuritis can affect the superior and inferior vestibular nerves together or can selectively affect the superior vestibular nerve.
|
|
| 3. |
- Betts, G A, et al.
(författare)
-
Neck muscle vibration alters visually-perceived roll after unilateral vestibular loss
- 2000
-
Ingår i: NeuroReport. - 1473-558X. ; 11:12, s. 2659-2662
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Unilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle vibration was applied to 21 normal and six unilateral vestibular deafferented (uVD) human subjects at head erect and during 30 degrees left and right whole body roll-tilt. In normal subjects, neck vibration had no effect upon the settings of a visual bar to subjective visual horizontal (SVH) in any roll-tilt condition. In uVD subjects settings to SVH were significantly altered by neck vibration, with ipsilesional neck vibration increasing the SVH bias at head erect. Further, during contralesional roll-tilt, ipsilesional neck vibration in uVD subjects significantly increased the E-effect. These results suggest that compensation after vestibular loss allows cervical signals to influence visual perception of roll-tilt.
|
|
| 4. |
- Fransson, Per-Anders, et al.
(författare)
-
Direction of galvanically-induced vestibulo-postural responses during active and passive neck torsion
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1651-2251 .- 0001-6489. ; 120:4, s. 500-503
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The direction of a postural response induced by galvanic vestibular stimulation depends on the head and trunk position. The relative importance of afferent information (proprioception) and efferent motor command/corollary discharge is unknown. We studied the direction of body sway evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation in 9 healthy subjects during active and passive head positioning at 0 degrees frontal position, 35 degrees to the left, and 75 degrees to the right, using a custom-built collar. At 0 degrees and 75 degrees there were no significant differences in sway direction between active and passive head positioning. The galvanic stimulation invoked sway toward the anode, mainly in the inter-aural direction. The sway direction differed significantly between active and passive positioning at 35 degrees to the side (p < 0.05). When the head was actively kept in this position, the body sway was mainly in an inter-aural direction. The sway shifted to a naso-occipital direction when the head was passively positioned at 35 degrees. Our results indicate that the afferent proprioceptive information has the largest influence on the direction of the galvanically-induced postural response, although some dependence on efferent motor commands and non-linear cervical proprioception cannot be ruled out entirely.
|
|
| 5. |
- Fransson, Per-Anders, et al.
(författare)
-
Postural Control Adaptation during Galvanic Vestibular and Vibratory Proprioceptive Stimulation
- 2003
-
Ingår i: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. - 1558-2531. ; 50:12, s. 1310-1319
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- he objective for this study was to investigate whether the adaptation of postural control was similar during galvanic vestibular stimulation and during vibratory proprioceptivestimulation of the calf muscles. Healthy subjects were tested during erect stance with eyes open or closed. An analysis method designed to consider the adaptive adjustments was used to evaluate the motion dynamics and the evoked changes of posture and stimulation response.Galvanic vestibular stimulation induced primarily lateral body movements and vibratory proprioceptive stimulation induced anteroposterior movements. The lateral body sway generated by the galvanic stimulation was proportionally smaller and contained more high-frequency movements (0.1 Hz) than the anteroposterior body sway induced by the vibratory stimulation. The adaptive adjustments of the body sway to the stimulation had similar time course and magnitude during galvanic and vibratory stimulation. The perturbations induced by stimulation were gradually reduced within the same time range (15–20 s) and both kinds of stimulation induced a body leaning whose direction was dependent on stimulus. The similarities in the adjustmentpatterns suggest that postural control operates in the same way independent of the receptor systems affected by the disturbance and irrespective of whether the motion responses were induced in a lateral or anteroposterior direction.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Hafström, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Visual influence on postural control, with and without visual motion feedback.
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1651-2251 .- 0001-6489. ; 122:4, s. 392-397
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Body sway was investigated in 20 healthy subjects to determine whether visual input must contain motion feedback information from the surroundings in order to influence postural control. Posturography was used to record body sway under the following visual conditions: eyes open with or without a restricted visual field; eyes open in ganzfield white light; eyes open in darkness with a head-fixed visual target; eyes open in darkness; and eyes closed in darkness. Stance was perturbed by means of a pseudorandomly applied vibratory stimulation to the calf muscles. Least sway was found with eyes open in an unrestricted visual field but increased in a restricted visual field. Greatest sway was found without visual motion feedback, i.e. under the following conditions: eyes closed; eyes open in darkness; eyes open in ganzfield white light; and with a head-mounted fixation point. Sway was significantly (p < 0.05) greater with eyes open in darkness compared with eyes closed during the initial 50 s with perturbations. After 150 s, sway was almost identical under the four test conditions without visual motion feedback. Standing with eyes open in darkness was initially a disadvantage compared with having the eyes closed. The postural control system may be programmed to expect visual feedback information when the eyes are open, which may delay changes in postural strategy.
|
|
| 10. |
- Halmagyi, G M, et al.
(författare)
-
Inferior vestibular neuritis
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. - 0077-8923. ; 956, s. 306-313
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Sudden, spontaneous, unilateral loss of vestibular function without simultaneous hearing loss or brain stem signs is generally attributed to a viral infection involving the vestibular nerve and is called acute vestibular neuritis. The clinical hallmarks of acute vestibular neuritis are vertigo, spontaneous nystagmus, and unilateral loss of lateral semicircular function as shown by impulsive and caloric testing. In some patients with vestibular neuritis the process appears to involve only anterior and lateral semicircular function, and these patients are considered to have selective superior vestibular neuritis. Here we report on two patients with acute vertigo, normal lateral semicircular canal function as shown by both impulsive and caloric testing, but selective loss of posterior semicircular canal function as shown by impulsive testing and of saccular function as shown by vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing. We suggest that these patients had selective inferior vestibular neuritis and that contrary to conventional teaching, in a patient with acute spontaneous vertigo, unilateral loss of lateral semicircular canal function is not essential for a diagnosis of acute vestibular neuritis.
|
|
