| 1. |
- Abdin, Amr, et al.
(författare)
-
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment strategies
- 2024
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 412
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The prevalence of HF with preserved ejection raction (HFpEF, with EF >= 50%) is increasing across all populations with high rates of hospitalization and mortality, reaching up to 80% and 50%, respectively, within a 5-year timeframe. Comorbidity-driven systemic inflammation is thought to cause coronary microvascular dysfunction and increased epicardial adipose tissue, leading to downstream friborsis and molecular changes in the cardiomyocyte, leading to increased stiffness and diastolic dynsfunction. HFpEF poses unique challenges in terms of diagnosis due to its complex and diverse nature. The diagnosis of HFpEF relies on a combination of clinical assessment, imaging studies, and biomarkers. An additional important step in diagnosing HFpEF involves excluding certain cardiac diagnoses that may be specific underlying causes of HFpEF or may be masquerading as HFpEF and require specific alternative treatment approaches. In addition to administering sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors to all patients, the most effective approach to enhance clinical outcomes may involve tailored therapy based on each patient's unique clinical profile. Exercise should be recommended for all patients to improve the quality of life. Glucagon-like peptide-1 1 agonists are a promising treatment option in obese HFpEF patients. Novel approaches targeting inflammation are also in early phase trials.
|
|
| 2. |
- Becher, Peter Moritz, et al.
(författare)
-
Eligibility for sotagliflozin in a real-world heart failure population based on the SOLOIST-WHF trial enrolment criteria: data from the Swedish heart failure registry
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS. - 2055-6837 .- 2055-6845. ; 9:4, s. 343-352
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims The SOLOIST-WHF trial demonstrated efficacy of sotagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and recent worsening heart failure (HF) regardless of ejection fraction (EF). Selection criteria in trials may limit their generalizability. Therefore, we aimed to investigate eligibility for sotagliflozin based on the SOLOIST-WHF criteria in a real-world HF population. Methods and results SOLOIST-WHF criteria were applied to patients stabilized after HF hospitalization in the Swedish HF Registry according to (i) literal scenario (all inclusion/exclusion criteria) or (ii) pragmatic scenario (only criteria likely to influence treatment decisions). Of 5453 inpatients with T2DM and recent worsening HF, 51.4% had reduced EF (HFrEF), 19.1% mildly reduced (HFmrEF), and 29.5% preserved EF (HFpEF). Eligibility (literal) was: 27.2% (32.4% in HFrEF, 24.7% in HFmrEF, 19.7% in HFpEF) and eligibility (pragmatic) was 62.8% (69.1%, 60.3%, 53.4%, respectively). In the literal scenario, criteria limiting eligibility were HF duration <3 months, eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), age >85 years, acute coronary syndrome <3 months, and insufficiently high N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Eligible vs. non-eligible patients had more severe HF, higher cardiovascular (CV) comorbidity burden, higher use of HF treatments, and higher event rates (all-cause death 30.8 vs. 27.2 per 100 patient-years, CV death 19.1 vs. 16.6, and HF hospitalization 36.7 vs. 24.0). Conclusion In this large, real-world HF cohort with T2DM, similar to 1/3 of patients were eligible for sotagliflozin in the literal and similar to 2/3 of patients in the pragmatic scenario. Eligible patients had more severe HF and higher event rates, in particular CV and HF events.
|
|
| 3. |
- Brunner-La Rocca, Hans-Peter, et al.
(författare)
-
Which heart failure patients profit from natriuretic peptide guided therapy? A meta-analysis from individual patient data of randomized trials.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 17:12, s. 1252-1261
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: Previous analyses suggest that heart failure (HF) therapy guided by (N-terminal pro-)brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) might be dependent on left ventricular ejection fraction, age and co-morbidities, but the reasons remain unclear.METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine interactions between (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy and HF with reduced [ejection fraction (EF) ≤45%; HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), n = 1731] vs. preserved EF [EF > 45%; HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), n = 301] and co-morbidities (hypertension, renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular insult, peripheral vascular disease) on outcome, individual patient data (n = 2137) from eight NT-proBNP guidance trials were analysed using Cox-regression with multiplicative interaction terms. Endpoints were mortality and admission because of HF. Whereas in HFrEF patients (NT-pro)BNP-guided compared with symptom-guided therapy resulted in lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.97, P = 0.03] and fewer HF admissions (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, P = 0.02), no such effect was seen in HFpEF (mortality: HR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.76-1.96, P = 0.41; HF admissions HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.67-1.53, P = 0.97; interactions P < 0.02). Age (74 ± 11 years) interacted with treatment strategy allocation independently of EF regarding mortality (P = 0.02), but not HF admission (P = 0.54). The interaction of age and mortality was explained by the interaction of treatment strategy allocation with co-morbidities. In HFpEF, renal failure provided strongest interaction (P < 0.01; increased risk of (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy if renal failure present), whereas in HFrEF patients, the presence of at least two of the following co-morbidities provided strongest interaction (P < 0.01; (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy beneficial only if none or one of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, cardiovascular insult, or peripheral vascular disease present). (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy was harmful in HFpEF patients without hypertension (P = 0.02).CONCLUSION: The benefits of therapy guided by (NT-pro)BNP were present in HFrEF only. Co-morbidities seem to influence the response to (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy and may explain the lower efficacy of this approach in elderly patients.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hübbert, Laila, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-term and real-life incidence of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in patients with breast cancer: a Swedish cohort study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Oncology. - : FRONTIERS MEDIA SA. - 2234-943X. ; 44
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundThe administration of anticancer drugs in females with comorbidity increases the risk for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT), which in turn contributes to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Furthermore, a pathophysiological connection between cancer and cardiovascular disease may exist. ObjectiveTo assess the long-term risks and predictors of CTR-CVT, including clinical hypertension (HT), coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), as well as all-cause mortality in women diagnosed with early breast cancer (BC) and eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy in Sweden. MethodsData were extracted from Swedish registers and medical records on 433 women, 18-60 years of age, diagnosed 1998-2002 with lymph node-positive BC, and considered for adjuvant chemotherapy. CTR-CVT was defined as HT, CAD, HF, or AF after the diagnosis of BC. Follow-up was from the date of BC diagnosis until November 30, 2021, or death. Prevalence of CTR-CVT and all-cause mortality were calculated. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined for factors associated with CTR-CVT. ResultsThe median age was 50 (interquartile range (IQR) 32) years. 910 CTR-CVT events were diagnosed in 311 women with a median of 19.3 (IQR 15,3) years follow-up. The proportions of CTR-CVT events were: HT 281 (64%); CAD 198 (46%); HF 206 (47%); and AF 225 (51%). The cumulative incidence of CTR-CVT was 71.8%, and 50% of all 433 patients developed CTR-CVT within 11.7 years of BC diagnosis (standard deviation (SD) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6-12.9). Age was a risk factor for CTR-CVT. Anthracycline increased the risk for HF (p=0,001; HR 2,0; 95%CI 1,4-2,8), CAD (p= 0,002; HR 1,7; 95% CI 1,2-2,4), and AF (p=0,013; HR 1,5; 95% CI 1,0-2,0). At the end of the 24-year study period, 227 of the 433 women were alive, and the total cumulative mortality was 47,6%. ConclusionThe prevalence of CTR-CVT and all-cause mortality is high after BC diagnosis and treatment, particularly in older patients and those receiving anthracyclines. These findings and the onset of CTR-CVT support cardio-oncology guidelines recommending initial risk stratification and cardiovascular monitoring during treatment, followed by long-term annual screening for cardiovascular risk factors and CTR-CVT among BC survivors.
|
|
| 5. |
- Karlström, Patric, et al.
(författare)
-
Can BNP-guided therapy improve health-related quality of life, and do responders to BNP-guided heart failure treatment have improved health-related quality of life? Results from the UPSTEP study.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. - : BioMed Central. - 1471-2261 .- 1471-2261. ; 16
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: To investigate whether B-type natriuretic peptide (NP)-guided treatment of heart failure (HF) patients improved their health related quality of life (Hr-QoL) compared to routine HF treatment, and whether changes in Hr-QoL differed depending on whether the patient was a responder to NP-guided therapy or not.Methods: A secondary analysis of the UPSTEP-study, a Scandinavian multicentre study using a prospective, randomized, open, blinded evaluation design on patients with HF with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV. NP-guiding was aimed to reduce BNP <150 ng/L if<75 years or BNP<300 ng/L if>75 years. A responder was defined as a patient with a BNP<300 ng/L and/or a decrease in BNP of at least 40 % in week 16 compared to study start. Short form-36 (SF-36) was used to measure Hr-QoL. At the study start, 258 patients presented evaluable SF-36 questionnaires, 131 in the BNP group and 127 in the control group. At the study end 100 patients in the NP-guided group and 98 in the control group, presenting data from both the study start and the study end.Results: There were no significant differences in Hr-QoL between NP-guided HF treatment and control group; however significant improvements could be seen in four of the eight domains in the NP-guided group, whereas in the control group improvements could be seen in six of the domains.Among the responders improvements could be noted in four domains whereas in the non-responders improvements could be seen in only one domain evaluating within group changes.Conclusions: Improved Hr-QoL could be demonstrated in several of the domains in both the NP-guided and the control group. In the responder group within group analyses showed more increased Hr-QoL compared to the non-responder group. However, all groups demonstrated increase in Hr-QoL.
|
|
| 6. |
- Karlström, Patric
(författare)
-
Heart failure : biomarker effect and influence on quality of life
- 2016
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background and aims: Heart failure (HF) is a life threatening condition and optimal handling is necessary to reduce risk of therapy failure. The aims of this thesis were: (Paper I) to examine whether BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide)-guided HF treatment improves morbidity and mortality when compared with HF therapy implemented by a treating physician at sites experienced in managing patients with HF according to guidelines; (Paper II) to investigate how to define a responder regarding optimal cut-off level of BNP to predict death, need for hospitalisation, and worsening HF and to determine the optimal time to apply the chosen cut-off value; (Paper III) to evaluate how Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) is influenced by natriuretic peptide guiding and to study how HR-QoL is affected in responders compared to non-responders; (Paper IV) to evaluate the impact of patient age on clinical outcomes, and to evaluate the impact of duration of the HF disease on outcomes and the impact of age and HF duration on BNP concentration.Methods: A randomized, parallel group, multi-centre study was undertaken on 279 patients with HF and who had experienced an episode of worsening HF with increased BNP concentration. The control group (n=132) was treated according to HF guidelines and in the BNP-guided group (n=147) the HF treatment algorithm goal was to reduce BNP concentration to < 150 ng/L in patients < 75 years and <300 ng/L in patients > 75 years (Paper I), and to define the optimal percentage decrease in BNP and at what point during the follow-up to apply the definition (Paper II). To compare the BNP-guided group with the conventional HF treated group (Paper I), and responders and non-responders (Paper II) regarding HR-QoL measured with Short Form 36 (SF-36) at study start and at study end (Paper III) and to evaluate if age or HF duration influenced the HF outcomes and the influence of BNP on age and HF duration (Paper IV).Results: The primary outcome (mortality, hospitalisation and worsening HF) was not improved by BNP-guided HF treatment compared to conventional HF treatment or in any of the secondary outcome variables (Paper I). Applying a BNP decrease of at least 40 percent in week 16 (compared to study start) and/or a BNP<300 ng/L demonstrated the best risk reduction for cardiovascular mortality, by 78 percent and 89 percent respectively for HF mortality (Paper II). The HR-QoL improved in four domains in the BNP-guided group and in the control group in six of eight domains; however there were no significant differences between the groups (Paper III). For responders the within group analysis showed improvement in four domains compared to the non-responders that improved in one domain; however there were no significant differences between the two groups. There were improvements in HR-QoL in all four groups (Paper III). Age did not influence outcome but HF duration did. HF duration was divided into three groups: HF duration less than 1 year (group 1), 1-5 years (group 2) and >5 years (group 3). A 1.65-fold increased risk could be demonstrated in those with HF duration of more than five years compared to patients with short HF duration. The BNP concentration was increased with increased age, and there was a better response regarding BNP decrease in NP-guiding in patients with short HF duration, independent of age (Paper IV).Conclusions: There were no significant differences between BNP-guided HF treatment group and the group with conventional HF treatment as regards mortality, hospitalisation or HR-QoL. The responders to HF treatment showed a significantly better outcome in mortality and hospitalisation compared to non-responders but no significant differences in HR-QoL. The duration of HF might be an important factor to consider in HF treatment by BNP-guiding in the future.
|
|
| 7. |
- Karlström, Patric, et al.
(författare)
-
Modern heart failure treatment is superior to conventional treatment across the left ventricular ejection spectrum: real-life data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry 2013-2020
- 2024
-
Ingår i: CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY. - : SPRINGER HEIDELBERG. - 1861-0684 .- 1861-0692. ; 113, s. 1355-1368
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives This study is aimed to compare the effectiveness of modern therapy including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with conventional heart failure treatment in the real world. Background Since ARNI and SGLT2i were introduced to treat heart failure (HF), its therapeutic regimen has modernized from previous treatment with beta-blocker (BB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) as added-on in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, a comparison between conventional and modern treatment strategies with drugs in combination has not been performed. Methods This observational study (2013-2020), using the Swedish HF Registry, involved 20,849 HF patients. Patients received either conventional (BB, ACEi/ARB, with/without MRA, n = 20,140) or modern (BB, ACEi/ARB, MRA, SGLT2i or BB, ARNI, MRA with/without SGLT2i, n = 709) treatment at the index visit. The endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Results Modern HF therapy was associated with a significant 28% reduction in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.72 (0.54-0.96); p = 0.024) and a significant 62% reduction in CV mortality (aHR, 0.38 (0.21-0.68); p = 0.0013) compared to conventional HF treatment. Similar results emerged in a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching. The interaction analyses did not reveal any trends for EF (< 40% and >= 40%), sex, age (< 70 and >= 70 years), eGFR (< 60 and >= 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), and etiology of HF subgroups. Conclusion In this nationwide study, modern HF therapy was associated with significantly reduced all-cause and CV mortality, regardless of EF, sex, age, eGFR, and etiology of HF. [GRAPHICS] .
|
|
| 8. |
- Karlström, Patric, et al.
(författare)
-
Responder to BNP-guided treatment in heart failure. The process of defining a responder.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1401-7431 .- 1651-2006. ; 49:6, s. 316-324
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels predict prognosis and outcome in heart failure (HF) patients. To evaluate the optimal cut-off level of BNP to predict death, need for hospitalization, and worsening HF, and also to determine the optimal time to apply the chosen cut-off value.DESIGN: In a sub-study from the Use of PeptideS in Tailoring hEart failure Project or UPSTEP study where tailoring treatment of HF by BNP level was evaluated, we assessed the change in percentage between levels of BNP at study start versus a specific week (2, 6, 10, 16, 24, 36, or 48) during the follow-up period.RESULTS: The optimum cut-off percentage levels were obtained using a Cox proportional regression analysis of death, hospitalization, and worsening HF. A decrease in BNP by less than 40% in week 16 compared with study start and/or a BNP > 300 ng/L presented the highest hazard ratio (HR) for a non-responder to reach a combined endpoint (HR: 2.43; 95% confidence interval or CI: 1.61-3.65; p < 0.00003). This definition gave a 78% risk reduction of cardiovascular (CV) mortality (p > 0.0005) and an 89% risk reduction of HF mortality (p > 0.004), and reduced risk of CV and HF hospitalization for the responders.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a decrease in BNP of more than 40% compared with that at study start and/or a BNP level below 300 ng/L at week 16 had a significantly reduced risk of CV and HF mortality and hospitalization.
|
|
| 9. |
- Karlström, Patric, et al.
(författare)
-
Responder to BNP-guided treatment in heart failure. The process of defining a responder Results from the Use of PeptideS in Tailoring hEart failure Project or UPSTEP study
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1401-7431 .- 1651-2006. ; 49:6, s. 316-324
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels predict prognosis and outcome in heart failure (HF) patients. To evaluate the optimal cut-off level of BNP to predict death, need for hospitalization, and worsening HF, and also to determine the optimal time to apply the chosen cut-off value. Design. In a sub-study from the Use of PeptideS in Tailoring hEart failure Project or UPSTEP study where tailoring treatment of HF by BNP level was evaluated, we assessed the change in percentage between levels of BNP at study start versus a specific week (2, 6, 10, 16, 24, 36, or 48) during the follow-up period. Results. The optimum cut-off percentage levels were obtained using a Cox proportional regression analysis of death, hospitalization, and worsening HF. A decrease in BNP by less than 40% in week 16 compared with study start and/or a BNP > 300 ng/L presented the highest hazard ratio (HR) for a non-responder to reach a combined endpoint (HR: 2.43; 95% confidence interval or CI: 1.61-3.65; p < 0.00003). This definition gave a 78% risk reduction of cardiovascular (CV) mortality (p > 0.0005) and an 89% risk reduction of HF mortality (p > 0.004), and reduced risk of CV and HF hospitalization for the responders. Conclusions. Patients with a decrease in BNP of more than 40% compared with that at study start and/or a BNP level below 300 ng/L at week 16 had a significantly reduced risk of CV and HF mortality and hospitalization.
|
|
| 10. |
- Karlström, Patric, et al.
(författare)
-
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are associated with reduced risk of mortality and readmissions in heart failure
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Esc Heart Failure. - : WILEY PERIODICALS, INC. - 2055-5822. ; 11:1, s. 327-337
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims Compelling evidence from randomized trials has shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are effective in heart failure (HF) across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions. However, there are very few studies with real-world data.Methods and results A retrospective cohort analysis was performed based on patient-level data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) linked with three other national registers. Patients included had an index registration between 3 September 2013 and 31 December 2020 in SwedeHF and were on treatment with guideline-recommended therapy without or with SGLT2i 3 months before or 6 months after their index registration. Endpoints were mortality or readmissions. Association between the use of SGLT2i and endpoints was studied using adjusted Cox models. In the overall cohort, 796/22 405 patients were included with/without SGLT2i. In patients with SGLT2i, 93.5% had diabetes mellitus. In the overall cohort, SGLT2i was statistically significantly associated with all-cause mortality {hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.79], P < 0.0001}, cardiovascular mortality [HR: 0.29 (95% CI 0.17-0.50), P < 0.0001], cardiovascular mortality or HF readmission [HR: 0.89 (95% CI 0.80-1.00), P = 0.046], and all-cause readmissions [HR: 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-0.99), P = 0.038]. Similar results were obtained for the diabetes cohort. However, no association with cause-specific readmissions was observed.Conclusions This nationwide real-world study indicates that patients with HF, in which majority coexisted with diabetes mellitus, who received SGLT2i were statistically significantly associated with lower risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular mortality or HF readmissions, and all-cause readmissions, in line with the randomized trials assessing SGLT2i.
|
|
