| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Agha, R. A., et al.
(författare)
-
The SCARE 2018 statement: Updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines
- 2018
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Surgery. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1743-9191. ; 60, s. 132-136
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: The SCARE Guidelines were published in 2016 to provide a structure for reporting surgical case reports. Since their publication, SCARE guidelines have been widely endorsed by authors, journal editors, and reviewers, and have helped to improve reporting transparency of case reports across a range of surgical specialties. In order to encourage further progress in reporting quality, the SCARE guidelines must themselves be kept up to date. We completed a Delphi consensus exercise to update the SCARE guidelines. Methods: A Delphi consensus exercise was undertaken. All members of the previous Delphi group were invited to participate, in addition to researchers who have previously studied case reports, and editors from the International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. The expert group was sent an online questionnaire where they were asked to rate their agreement with proposed changes to each of the 24 items. Results: 56 people agreed to participate and 45 (80%) invitees completed the survey which put forward modifications to the original guideline. The collated responses resulted in modifications. There was high agreement amongst the expert group. Conclusion: A modified and improved SCARE checklist is presented, after a Delphi consensus exercise was completed. The SCARE 2018 Statement: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines. © 2018
|
|
| 3. |
- Gaipov, Abduzhappar, et al.
(författare)
-
Acute kidney injury following coronary revascularization procedures in patients with advanced CKD.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0931-0509 .- 1460-2385. ; 34:11, s. 1894-1901
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Previous studies reported that compared with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with a reduced risk of mortality and repeat revascularization in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Information about outcomes associated with CABG versus PCI in patients with advanced stages of CKD is limited. We evaluated the incidence and relative risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with CABG versus PCI in patients with advanced CKD.Methods: We examined 730 US veterans with incident ESRD who underwent a first CABG or PCI up to 5 years prior to dialysis initiation. The association of CABG versus PCI with AKI was examined in multivariable adjusted logistic regression analyses.Results: A total of 466 patients underwent CABG and 264 patients underwent PCI. The mean age was 64 ± 8 years, 99% were male, 20% were African American and 84% were diabetic. The incidence of AKI in the CABG versus PCI group was 67% versus 31%, respectively (P < 0.001). The incidence of all stages of AKI were higher after CABG compared with PCI. CABG was associated with a 4.5-fold higher crude risk of AKI {odds ratio [OR] 4.53 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.28-6.27]; P < 0.001}, which remained significant after multivariable adjustments [OR 3.50 (95% CI 2.03-6.02); P < 0.001].Conclusion: CABG was associated with a 4.5-fold higher risk of AKI compared with PCI in patients with advanced CKD. Despite other benefits of CABG over PCI, the extremely high risk of AKI associated with CABG should be considered in this vulnerable population when deciding on the optimal revascularization strategy.
|
|
| 4. |
- Gaipov, Abduzhappar, et al.
(författare)
-
Predialysis coronary revascularization and postdialysis mortality
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. - : MOSBY-ELSEVIER. - 0022-5223 .- 1097-685X. ; 157:3, s. 976-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with better survival than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the optimal strategy for coronary artery revascularization in patients with advanced CKD who transition to ESRD is unclear. Methods: We examined a contemporary national cohort of 971 US veterans with incident ESRD who underwent first CABG or PCI up to 5 years before dialysis initiation. We examined the association of a history of CABG versus PCI with all-cause mortality following transition to dialysis using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for time between procedure and dialysis initiation, sociodemographics, comorbidities, and medications. Results: In total, 582 patients underwent CABG and 389 patients underwent PCI. The mean age was 64 +/- 8 years, 99% of patients were male, 79% were white, 19% were African American, and 84% had diabetes. The all-cause post-dialysis mortality rates after CABG and PCI were 229 per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 205-256) and 311 per 1000 patient years (95% CI, 272-356), respectively. Compared with PCI, patients who underwent CABG had 34% lower risk of death (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86, P = .002) after initiation of dialysis. Results were similar in all subgroups of patients stratified by age, race, type of intervention, presence/absence of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and diabetes. Conclusions: CABG in patients with advanced CKD was associated lower risk of death after initiation of dialysis compared with PCI.
|
|
