| 1. |
- Suhonen, Riitta, et al.
(författare)
-
European orthopaedic and trauma patients' perceptions of nursing care : a comparative study
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Nursing. - 0962-1067 .- 1365-2702. ; 18:20, s. 2818-2829
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIM: To compare English, Finnish, Greek and Swedish orthopaedic and trauma patients' perceptions of nursing care received during hospitalisation. BACKGROUND: Patient perceptions are important when evaluating nursing care delivery. Evaluations usually take place sub-nationally though European citizens may be treated throughout the European Union. International comparative studies are possible because of the universal nature and philosophical roots of quality in nursing care. They are needed to assist in improving care outcomes. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, comparative study design was used. METHOD: The Schmidt Perception of Nursing Care Survey was used to obtain data from orthopaedic and trauma patients in acute hospitals in four countries: Finland (n = 425, response rate 85%), Greece (n = 315, 86%), Sweden (n = 218, 73%) and UK (n = 135, 85%). Data were first analysed using descriptive statistics, then between-country comparisons were computed inferentially using a one-way analysis of variance and a univariate analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Between-country differences were found in patients' perceptions of the nursing care received. Over the whole Schmidt Perception of Nursing Care Survey the Swedish and Finnish patients gave their care the highest assessments and the Greek patients the lowest. The same trend was seen in each of the four sub-scales: Seeing The Individual Patient, Explaining, Responding and Watching. Responding was given the highest assessments in each participating country and Seeing the Individual Patient the lowest except in Greece. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to consider whether the between-country differences found are caused by differences between cultures, nursing practices, roles of healthcare personnel or patients in the different countries. The Schmidt Perception of Nursing Care Survey is suitable for the assessment of European orthopaedic and trauma patients' perceptions of nursing care received during hospitalisation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results are useful in evaluating and developing nursing care in hospitals from different European countries.
|
|
| 2. |
- Suhonen, Riitta, et al.
(författare)
-
European orthopaedic and trauma patients perceptions of nursing care : a comparative study
- 2009
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING. - : Wiley. - 0962-1067 .- 1365-2702. ; 18:20, s. 2818-2829
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim. To compare English, Finnish, Greek and Swedish orthopaedic and trauma patients perceptions of nursing care received during hospitalisation. Background. Patient perceptions are important when evaluating nursing care delivery. Evaluations usually take place sub-nationally though European citizens may be treated throughout the European Union. International comparative studies are possible because of the universal nature and philosophical roots of quality in nursing care. They are needed to assist in improving care outcomes. Design. A cross-sectional, comparative study design was used. Method. The Schmidt Perception of Nursing Care Survey was used to obtain data from orthopaedic and trauma patients in acute hospitals in four countries: Finland (n = 425, response rate 85%), Greece (n = 315, 86%), Sweden (n = 218, 73%) and UK (n = 135, 85%). Data were first analysed using descriptive statistics, then between-country comparisons were computed inferentially using a one-way analysis of variance and a univariate analysis of covariance. Results. Between-country differences were found in patients perceptions of the nursing care received. Over the whole Schmidt Perception of Nursing Care Survey the Swedish and Finnish patients gave their care the highest assessments and the Greek patients the lowest. The same trend was seen in each of the four sub-scales: Seeing The Individual Patient, Explaining, Responding and Watching. Responding was given the highest assessments in each participating country and Seeing the Individual Patient the lowest except in Greece. Conclusions. Further research is needed to consider whether the between-country differences found are caused by differences between cultures, nursing practices, roles of healthcare personnel or patients in the different countries. The Schmidt Perception of Nursing Care Survey is suitable for the assessment of European orthopaedic and trauma patients perceptions of nursing care received during hospitalisation. Relevance to clinical practice. The results are useful in evaluating and developing nursing care in hospitals from different European countries.
|
|
| 3. |
- Suhonen, Riitta, et al.
(författare)
-
Individualised care from the orthopaedic and trauma patients' perspective : an international comparative survey
- 2008
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Nursing Studies. - 0020-7489 .- 1873-491X. ; 45:11, s. 1586-1597
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Although individualised nursing care is considered a core value in nursing in different countries, international comparative studies in this area are rare. In Western countries, common hospitalised patients, e.g. orthopaedic patients, often perceive health care as impersonal rather than individualised; a term which may also have different connotations in different cultures. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare orthopaedic and trauma patients' perceptions of individuality in their care in four European countries. DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparative study. SETTINGS: 24 orthopaedic and trauma wards in 13 acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from orthopaedic and trauma patients in Finland (n=425, response rate 85%), Greece (n=315, 86%), Sweden (n=218, 73%) and UK (n=135, 58%) between March 2005 and December 2006. METHODS: Questionnaire survey data using the Individualised Care Scale (ICS) were obtained and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics including frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals (CI), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi2 statistics and univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). RESULTS: Patients perceived that nurses generally supported their individuality during specific nursing interventions and perceived individuality in their care. There were some between-country differences in the results. Patients' individuality in the clinical situation and in decisional control over their care were also generally well supported and taken into account. However, patients' personal life situation was not supported well through nursing interventions and these patients perceived lower levels of individualised care. CONCLUSIONS: North-South axis differences in patients' perceptions of individualised care may be attributed to the way nursing care is defined and organised in different European countries. Differences may be due to the differences in regional samples, and so no firm conclusions can be made. Further research will be needed to examine the effect of patient characteristics' and health care organisation variables in association with patients' perceptions of individualised care.
|
|
| 4. |
- Suhonen, Riitta, et al.
(författare)
-
Individualised care from the orthopaedic and trauma patients perspective : An international comparative survey
- 2008
-
Ingår i: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES. - : Elsevier BV. - 0020-7489 .- 1873-491X. ; 45:11, s. 1586-1597
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Although individualised nursing care is considered a core value in nursing in different countries, international comparative studies in this area are rare. In Western countries, common hospitalised patients, e.g. orthopaedic patients, often perceive health care as impersonal rather than individualised; a term which may also have different connotations in different cultures. Objectives: To describe and compare orthopaedic and trauma patients perceptions of individuality in their care in four European countries. Design: A cross-sectional comparative study. Settings: 24 orthopaedic and trauma wards in 13 acute care hospitals. Participants: Data were collected from orthopaedic and trauma patients in Finland (n = 425, response rate 85%), Greece (n = 315, 86%), Sweden (n = 218, 73%) and UK (n = 135, 58%) between March 2005 and December 2006. Methods: Questionnaire survey data using the Individualised Care Scale (ICS) were obtained and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics including frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals (CI), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi(2) statistics and univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Results: Patients perceived that nurses generally supported their individuality during specific nursing interventions and perceived individuality in their care. There were some between-country differences in the results. Patients individuality in the clinical situation and in decisional control over their care were also generally well supported and taken into account. However, patients personal life situation was not supported well through nursing interventions and these patients perceived lower levels of individualised care. Conclusions: North-South axis differences in patients perceptions of individualised care may be attributed to the way nursing care is defined and organised in different European countries. Differences may be due to the differences in regional samples, and so no firm conclusions can be made. Further research will be needed to examine the effect of patient characteristics and health care organisation variables in association with patients perceptions of individualised care.
|
|
| 5. |
- Suhonen, Riitta, et al.
(författare)
-
Individualised care from the orthopaedic nurses' point of view : a cross-cultural comparative study
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing. - : 2nd AMON International Orthopaedic Nursing Conference 15-16 October, 2009 St.Julians MALTA. - 1361-3111 .- 1873-4839. ; 13:4, s. 214-214
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- International cross-cultural comparative nursing research is considered important for the advancement of nursing knowledge, offering a global perspective for nursing. Although this is recognised in policy statements and quality standards, international comparative studies are rare in database citations. In western countries there is a major drive for quality improvement including patient-centred and individualised care. There are only a few studies about nurses’ perceptions of individualised care. The aim of this international cross-cultural study, IC Project International Nurse Study, was to describe and compare individualised care from the nurses’ point of view in eight countries and to pilot and validate the English, Finnish, Greek, Swedish, Portuguese and Turkish versions of the ICS – Nurse Instrument. Data were collected using questionnaires from orthopaedic and trauma nurses from eight countries, Cyprus, Finland, Greece, Portugal, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom (England) and the USA (Kansas). The target population of the study was nurses working in hospital orthopaedic in-patient wards. The study included a pilot study (n=30 per country) in January 2009. The main data collection took place from March to May 2009 (n=1200, at least 150 completed questionnaires from each country, based on power analysis for between-country comparison). The analysis is based on statistical methods. The results of this cross-cultural comparative nursing study will be shared with delegates. Based on the results of the earlier comparative nursing studies cross-cultural differences are expected in nurses’ perceptions about individualised nursing care.
|
|
