| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Athias, Jean -Denis, et al.
(författare)
-
Emergence of social-psychological barriers to social-ecological resilience : from causes to solutions
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Ecology and Society. - 1708-3087. ; 29:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study explores social-psychological barriers that may affect resilience in the context of sustainability. These barriers can be understood as unobserved processes that reduce the capacity of a social-ecological system to recover after a perturbation or transformation. Analyzing social-psychological processes enables us to distinguish passive and active processes, at the individual and collective levels. Our work suggests that interacting social and psychological processes should be considered as dynamically evolving determinants of resilience, especially when perturbations can change the psychology of individuals, and thus the underlying dynamics of social-ecological systems. Hence, considering social-psychological barriers and the conditions under which they emerge may provide decision makers with useful insights for coping with ineluctable uncertainties that reduce systems' transformative capacity and thus their general resilience.
|
|
| 3. |
- Engström, Gustav, et al.
(författare)
-
Carbon pricing and planetary boundaries
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Nature Communications. - BERLIN GERMANY : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2041-1723. ; 11:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Human activities are threatening to push the Earth system beyond its planetary boundaries, risking catastrophic and irreversible global environmental change. Action is urgently needed, yet well-intentioned policies designed to reduce pressure on a single boundary can lead, through economic linkages, to aggravation of other pressures. In particular, the potential policy spillovers from an increase in the global carbon price onto other critical Earth system processes has received little attention to date. To this end, we explore the global environmental effects of pricing carbon, beyond its effect on carbon emissions. We find that the case for carbon pricing globally becomes even stronger in a multi-boundary world, since it can ameliorate many other planetary pressures. It does however exacerbate certain planetary pressures, largely by stimulating additional biofuel production. When carbon pricing is allied with a biofuel policy, however, it can alleviate all planetary pressures.
|
|
| 4. |
- Engström, Gustav, et al.
(författare)
-
What Policies Address Both the Coronavirus Crisis and the Climate Crisis?
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Environmental and Resource Economics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0924-6460 .- 1573-1502. ; 76, s. 789-810
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The coronavirus pandemic has led many countries to initiate unprecedented economic recovery packages. Policymakers tackling the coronavirus crisis have also been encouraged to prioritize policies which help mitigate a second, looming crisis: climate change. We identify and analyze policies that combat both the coronavirus crisis and the climate crisis. We analyze both the long-run climate impacts from coronavirus-related economic recovery policies, and the impacts of long-run climate policies on economic recovery and public health post-recession. We base our analysis on data on emissions, employment and corona-related layoffs across sectors, and on previous research. We show that, among climate policies, labor-intensive green infrastructure projects, planting trees, and in particular pricing carbon coupled with reduced labor taxation boost economic recovery. Among coronavirus policies, aiding services sectors (leisure services such as restaurants and culture, or professional services such as technology), education and the healthcare sector appear most promising, being labor intensive yet low-emission-if such sectoral aid is conditioned on being directed towards employment and on low-carbon supply chains. Large-scale green infrastructure projects and green R&D investment, while good for the climate, are unlikely to generate enough employment to effectively alleviate the coronavirus crisis.
|
|
| 5. |
- Hassler, John, et al.
(författare)
-
SNS Economic Policy Council Report 2020 : Swedish Policy for Global Climate
- 2020
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Climate policy is a complex area that requires input from many different perspectives. The sns Economic Policy Council 2020 comprises nine researchers from a range of disciplines, with different backgrounds and with varied opinions on the debate surrounding climate policy. They analyse Swedish climate policy in a global context, describing the causes and consequences of climate change and focusing on how policy can achieve the desired reductions in carbon emissions. The report also provides answers to questions that are frequently discussed in the Swedish debate, such as the effectiveness of climate aid and whether Sweden should generate a larger surplus of fossil-free electricity for export.
|
|
| 6. |
- Hassler, John, et al.
(författare)
-
Svensk politik för globalt klimat
- 2020
-
Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Nio forskare från olika discipliner ingår i SNS Konjunkturråd 2020. Forskarna har bred bakgrund inom nationalekonomi, juridik, naturvetenskap och ingenjörsvetenskap. Tillsammans har de skrivit SNS Konjunkturrådsrapport 2020: Svensk politik för globalt klimat, där de fokuserar på hur politiken ska utformas för att bromsa och till slut stoppa klimatförändringarna. Några av deras viktigaste förslag och rekommendationer: Låt kolet stanna i marken. Det är kolet, inte konventionell olja, som är det centrala hotet mot klimatet. Om klimatförändringarna ska hejdas måste Kina bli av med sitt kolberoende. Indien och Afrika kan inte heller följa Kinas kolkraftsbaserade utvecklingsstrategi. Merparten av världens kolreserver måste stanna i marken.Inför globalt minimipris på koldioxidutsläpp och slopa fossilsubventioner. Det är två nödvändiga ingredienser i klimatpolitiken som måste diskuteras på FN:s nästa stora klimatkonferens COP26 i Glasgow.Gröna subventioner räcker inte för att minska utsläppen. Billig grön energi leder till ökad användning av sådan men inte automatiskt till att fossila bränslen utkonkurreras.Bidra till rätt global inriktning. Den svenska klimatpolitiken bör ha som överordnat mål att minska de globala utsläppen.Bidra finansiellt till andra länders omställning. Klokt och välavvägt klimatbistånd är både möjligt och önskvärt. Inom ramen för EU:s klimatpolitik finns fungerande sätt att finansera mindre rika medlemsländers utsläppsminskningar. Men eftersom även Sverige måste bli klimatneutralt bör ett ökat klimatbistånd inte minska de svenska klimatambitionerna.Klimatklubbar. Sverige bör driva frågan om att det ska vara tillåtet att införa klimattullar mot länder som inte har en acceptabel nivå på utsläppspriset. En modell är så kallade klimatklubbar där länder går ihop och sätter ett enhetligt utsläppspris. Import från länder som inte deltar i klubben beläggs med en tull.Fossilfri elexport kan ge betydande minskningar av utsläppen inom EU genom att pressa undan kolkraft där sådan fortfarande används.Finansiera insamling och lagring av koldioxid (CCS-teknik) med lagringspeng. Vi kan ta hand om koldioxid motsvarande hälften av Sveriges utsläpp till en kostnad motsvarande det som dras in till staten via koldioxidskatten. Det krävs dock en statlig finansiering som bör utformas som ett bidrag per ton insamlad och säkert lagrad koldioxid:– Motsvarande runt hälften av Sveriges koldioxidutsläpp kan tas bort om CCS-tekniken införs på de 27 industrianläggningar som släpper ut mest i Sverige. Detta är mer än utsläppen från hela den svenska vägtrafiken. Tekniken fungerar också i resten av världen och Sverige kan här bli ett föregångsland, säger John Hassler, ordförande i SNS Konjunkturråd 2020.
|
|
| 7. |
- Hesselink, André, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Healthy Nordic diet and associations with plasma concentrations of metabolites in the choline oxidation pathway: a cross-sectional study from Northern Sweden
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Nutrition Journal. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 1475-2891. ; 22:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundThe choline oxidation pathway and metabolites involved have been linked to diseases including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and cancer. A healthy Nordic diet is a recently defined dietary pattern associated with decreased risk for these diseases. Our aim was to explore associations between adherence to a healthy Nordic diet and plasma concentrations of metabolites of the choline oxidation pathway.MethodsThe Healthy Nordic Food Index (HNFI) and Baltic Sea Diet Score (BSDS) were applied to cross-sectional data (n = 969) from the Vasterbotten Intervention Programme in Northern Sweden to score adherence to a healthy Nordic diet. Data included responses to a dietary questionnaire and blood sample analyses (1991-2008). Associations of diet scores with plasma concentrations of metabolites of the choline oxidation pathway and total homocysteine (tHcy), seven metabolites in total, were evaluated with linear regression, adjusting for age, BMI, education and physical activity.ResultsHNFI scores showed linear relationships with plasma choline (beta = 0.11), betaine (beta = 0.46), serine (beta = 0.98) and tHcy (beta = - 0.38), and BSDS scores with betaine (beta = 0.13) and tHcy (beta = - 0.13); unstandardized beta coefficients, all significant at P < 0.05. The regression models predicted changes in plasma metabolite concentrations (+/- 1 SD changes in diet score) in the range of 1-5% for choline, betaine, serine and tHcy. No other statistically significant associations were observed.ConclusionsA healthy Nordic diet was associated with plasma concentrations of several metabolites of the choline oxidation pathway. Although relationships were statistically significant, effect sizes were moderate. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms and associations with health outcomes.
|
|
| 8. |
- Hjorth, Therese, et al.
(författare)
-
Changes in dietary carbon footprint over ten years relative to individual characteristics and food intake in the Vasterbotten Intervention Programme
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Scientific Reports. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2045-2322. ; 10:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The objective was to examine 10-year changes in dietary carbon footprint relative to individual characteristics and food intake in the unique longitudinal Vasterbotten Intervention Programme, Sweden. Here, 14 591 women and 13 347 men had been followed over time. Food intake was assessed via multiple two study visits 1996-2016, using a 64-item food frequency questionnaire. Greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) related to food intake, expressed as kg carbon dioxide equivalents/1000 kcal and day, were estimated. Participants were classified into GHGE quintiles within sex and 10-year age group strata at both visits. Women and men changing from lowest to highest GHGE quintile exhibited highest body mass index within their quintiles at first visit, and the largest increase in intake of meat, minced meat, chicken, fish and butter and the largest decrease in intake of potatoes, rice and pasta. Women and men changing from highest to lowest GHGE quintile exhibited basically lowest rates of university degree and marriage and highest rates of smoking within their quintiles at first visit. Among these, both sexes reported the largest decrease in intake of meat, minced meat and milk, and the largest increase in intake of snacks and, for women, sweets. More research is needed on how to motivate dietary modifications to reduce climate impact and support public health.
|
|
| 9. |
- Isacs, Lina
(författare)
-
Deliberating value : On the theory and practice of valuation of nature from neoclassical to ecological economics
- 2021
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This thesis is about whether it is a good idea to place monetary value on nature, to remedy the fact that we treat it as having no particular value to us humans, although it clearly has. The thesis is based on five research papers that can be said to position themselves on opposite sides in the debate on monetisation of nature. The first two papers consider the basis of neoclassical environmental economics and apply the value theory and valuation methods from normative neoclassical welfare theory, on which monetisation of nature is based. The other three papers examine, with increasing degrees of criticism, this theory of value and especially its central assumption that value can be derived from people’s choices, or “revealed preferences”. The thesis itself is a “reflective story” about the journey I made as I learned to think about and understand neoclassical environmental economics in new ways. I reflect upon my work from a philosophy of science perspective, consider how for-granted-taken ideas from neoclassical economics affect environmental economic analysis and its conclusions, and examine the subject of value and valuation from what has become my new theoretical standpoint, ecological economics. It concerns meta-theoretical questions about ontology, that is, ideas in a research discipline about how things really are (what is), and epistemology, ideas about how researchers can provide relevant knowledge about reality. Such ideas are often taken for granted in neoclassical economic analysis and how they affect the analysis and its conclusions is not seldom unreflective. In the thesis, I move from explaining why neoclassical environmental economists advocate monetisation and pricing of nature as important solutions to environmental problems, to exemplifying how this turned out in research projects intended to serve as decision support in practice, and then to exploring and clarifying an alternative theory of value and valuation from ecological economics based on value pluralism and so-called deliberative valuation. In a concluding discussion, I point out that there are reasons to be sceptical about whether monetisation of nature is the right path to follow if we want to change our unsustainable relationship with nature and tackle the serious ecological crises we currently face. I show that monetisation of nature in practice requires a considerable amount of pragmatism, since the applied version of the theory deviates far from its idealised claims about the possibility to capture actual, total values. I also show that the descriptive (so-called positive) part of neoclassical theory and its normative part overlap in a way that makes it very difficult to speak of “objective” science in environmental economics. Instead, and despite strong recognition in the discipline that environmental problems are “market failures”, neoclassical theory has an ethical and ideological bias that favours individuals’ freedom of choice and market solutions, at the expense of collective decision-making and discussions about values that cannot be quantified. The important contribution of the thesis is that it clarifies the consequences of a central idea in the theory behind environmental economic analysis, namely the idea of values as commensurable, that is, measurable in one single unit. This idea links to the misleading conception of choices as “trade-offs”, where all choices are essentially viewed as the result of people’s constant exchange of costs and benefits within themselves in every choice they make, with the result that everything gets better (or at least not worse). Based on my research, I suggest that, in reality, people do not generally “make” trade-offs. If anything, people try to avoid them, especially when it comes to difficult choices, such as those concerning the true value of nature, because such choices involve moral conflicts between values that are incommensurable. As a basis for valuing transformational change, monetisation is therefore unsuitable, as it conceals rather than reveals the ethical dilemmas that are the very definition of sustainability problems and causes us to search for the efficient or so-called “optimal” solutions claimed possible in neoclassical theory and rhetoric, although such solutions do not exist. What we need instead is to represent public opinion in environmental decision-making in ways that do not conceal people’s actual moral considerations. Environmental valuation is political. It must be done together with others through reason-sensitive means, where people’s actual experiences of value conflicts – within us and between us – can be deliberated before making decisions. This makes decision-making more complex, but as an alternative to monetisation, this realism is not necessarily unrealistic. The fact that incommensurability is grounded in human experience means that the complexity of social and environmental decision-making has a real counterpart in conflicts within ourselves. One could see this as a potentiality, because we may have more confidence in people’s ability to recognise the relevance and necessity of less simplification and more complexity in decision-making. People need to “deliberate values” rather than “consuming” them and being expected to express all sorts of values through money.
|
|
| 10. |
- Isacs, Lina, PhD, et al.
(författare)
-
'I didn't count "willingness to pay" as part of the value' : Monetary valuation through respondents' perspectives
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Environmental Values. - : Sage Publications. - 0963-2719 .- 1752-7015. ; 33:2, s. 163-188
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A frequent justification in the literature for using stated preference methods (SP) is that they are the only methods that can capture the so-called total economic value (TEV) of environmental changes to society. Based on follow-up interviews with SP survey respondents, this paper addresses the implications of that argument by shedding light on the construction of TEV, through respondents' perspective. It illuminates the deficiencies of willingness to pay (WTP) as a measure of value presented as three aggregated themes considering respondents' unintentionality, their retraction once they understood that their WTP could be decisive in cost-benefit analysis and the inherent incompleteness of WTP. We discuss why the TEV discourse persists, how it conceals rather than reveals broader notions of value and in what ways our results support the development of alternative approaches that truly endorse plurality in environmental valuation and decision-making.
|
|
