| 1. |
- Klionsky, Daniel J., et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lindén, Mårten, et al.
(författare)
-
Galectin-1, a potential therapeutic target, in primary tumors and metastases of urinary bladder carcinomas
- 2013
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Urinary bladder cancer would gain from new protein biomarkers due to the heterogeneity of disease. The beta-galactoside-binding protein (GAL1) is one such candidate and in present study its prognostic value and expression at protein level in metastatic bladder cancer-disease, have been evaluated. The protein expression of GAL1 was investigated by immunohistochemistry in two tumor cohorts, one with primary tumors of different stage and grade (n=344) and another with primary tumors matched with metastases (n=90). The expression in the actual cancer cells as well as in stroma and blood vessels were considered since the presence of GAL1 in different tissue compartments has shown cancer relevance. The cellular expression increased with increased tumor stage and grade (p<0.001). For the majority of the patients, cells from both primary tumor and metastasis showed a positive immunoreactivity for GAL1 (91% (n=64) for primary tumors with single metastasis (n=70) and 100% (n=20) for primary tumors with multiple metastasis (n=20). Further, strong immunoreactivity in T1 tumor cells correlated with lower risk of recurrence (p<0.05). Both tumors and metastasis exhibited strong stromal-GAL1 staining that could not be correlated with clinical parameters. The expression in vessels showed that T1 tumors surrounded by GAL1 negative blood vessels had a higher risk of progression (p<0.0001) into muscle invasive T2-4 stages. The results show that GAL1 is an important bladder cancer-protein from several aspects. Further, GAL1 is a promising therapeutic target in bladder cancer due to the general expression in advanced disease.
|
|
