| 1. |
- Lindström, Björn E., et al.
(author)
-
Borrelia Ocular Infection : A Case Report and a Systematic Review of Published Cases
- 2022
-
In: Ophthalmic Research. - : S. Karger. - 0030-3747 .- 1423-0259. ; 65:2, s. 121-130
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Lyme borreliosis can cause many diverse manifestations, also ocular disease where the diagnosis of ocular borreliosis is challenging. The primary aim was to report on the evidence of Borrelia spirochetes in the ocular tissue in presumed ocular borreliosis.METHODS: A systematic review of pathological eye conditions was performed where Borrelia has been suspected in relevant ocular tissue, together with a case report of diagnosed uveitis with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed Borrelia afzelii in the vitreous. The evidence for clinical and laboratory diagnosis was evaluated systematically. As a secondary aim, the treatment of ocular Borrelia infection was also evaluated for confirmed cases.RESULTS: Thirteen includable studies were found, and after the removal of case duplicates, eleven unique cases were extracted. Apart from the present case report, 4 other cases reported strong evidence for the detection of B. spirochetes in ocular tissue. Four cases presented reasonable evidence for assumed detected Borrelia, while three additional cases showed only weak diagnostic credibility that Borrelia was detected.CONCLUSION: This systematic review, including all reported cases and our case report, supports evidence of ocular infection of Borrelia species. Furthermore, in case of suspicion of infection and seronegativity, it is justified to look for Borrelia in eye tissue samples. In addition, microscopy without using PCR is not sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of borreliosis on ocular tissue. In the articles studied, there was no unambiguous recommendation of treatment.
|
|
| 2. |
- Hermansson, Ruth S., et al.
(author)
-
Elderly women's experiences of self-sampling for HPV testing.
- 2020
-
In: BMC Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2407. ; 20:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Self-sampling for HPV testing, as an alternative to the conventional speculum based sampling, is highly acceptable to women of screening ages. The aim of this study was to describe older women's (60 to 75 years) experiences of self-sampling.METHODS: In Sweden a descriptive study with quantitative and qualitative methods was designed to collect data from a survey of women who participated in self-sampling for HPV testing. Individual interviews were done with women who tested positive in the first self-sampling, and were either negative in their second HPV test or were positive in their second HPV test, but without precancerous lesions or cancer.RESULTS: Of 893 eligible women, 868 (97.2%) answered the survey. Among the surveyed women, 49.2% reported it was very easy to perform self-sampling, 46.8% answered it was easy and 2.0% answered it was not easy. A majority (58.9%) answered that they prefer self-sampling, 16.5% that they prefer sample collection by a healthcare provider, 23.7% did not have any preference and 0.9% did not answer the question. In the interviews, 13 of 16 invited women participated. Most of them reported that they prefer self-sampling because it was easy to perform, less embarrassing and less time consuming than a visit to a clinic. The majority of women reported that they were not worried when informed about having an HPV positive test. Overall, participating women with better knowledge about the significance of an HPV infection were more worried about having a positive HPV test.CONCLUSION: Cervical cancer remains a highly preventable disease through screening and early treatment. Our results indicated that vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing was a well-accepted method for cervical cancer prevention in this group of older women.TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.researchweb.org/is/en/fouckfuu/project/272587. Registered 24 June 2019-retrospectively registered. www.researchweb.org.
|
|
| 3. |
- Hermansson, Ruth S., et al.
(author)
-
Incidence of oncogenic HPV and HPV-related dysplasia five years after a negative HPV test by self-sampling in elderly women
- 2022
-
In: Infectious Agents and Cancer. - : Springer Nature. - 1750-9378. ; 17:42
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: Cervical cancer prevention for older women can be challenging since there are no specific guidelines for this group. This study aimed to determine the incidence of oncogenic HPV and HPV-related dysplasia in elderly women 5 years after being HPV negative.Methods: Invited women participated five years earlier in a study where self-sampling for HPV testing was applied, at this time, they were all HPV negative. The women were now, five years later invited to perform self-sampling for HPV testing. Women with a positive result performed a repeat HPV test. Those with a positive repeat HPV test were examined by colposcopy, biopsy and cytology.Results: Of the 804 invited women, 634 (76.9%) agreed to participate in the study and a self-sampling kit was sent to them. Of these, 99.6% (632/634) sent a sample to the HPV laboratory. The participation rate in each age group was 93.3% at age 65, 74.0% at age 70, 80.7% at age 75 and 64.6% at age 80. Overall 18 women (2.8%, 95% CI 3.2 to 6.0) were HPV positive in the first test and 8 (1.3%, 95% CI 0.6 to 2.6) in the second test. Sampling for the second test was done on average 5.4 months after the first test. Fifty per cent (4/8) of the women with a positive repeat test had dysplasia in histology.Conclusions: The incidence of HPV in previously HPV-negative elderly women was low. Among women who were HPV positive in a repeat test, there was a high prevalence of low grade dysplasia.
|
|
| 4. |
- Lannér, Lars, et al.
(author)
-
Incidence of HPV and HPV related dysplasia in elderly women in Sweden
- 2020
-
In: PLOS ONE. - : PLOS. - 1932-6203. ; 15:3
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: About one-third of the cervical cancer cases in Sweden occur in women over the age of 60. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of HPV, and HPV related dysplasia, in elderly women who had an HPV negative test at the age of 60 years or older.METHODS: From October 2004 to June 2019, 1784 women aged 60-90 years were sampled for an HPV test when attending an outpatient gynecology clinic. Of these women, 827 HPV-negative women had two or more HPV tests at intervals of three months to eleven years (mean 3.2 years). The women with positive results had a repeat HPV test and cytology after 2.5 months on average. Those with a positive repeat HPV test were examined by colposcopy and biopsy.FINDINGS: The overall prevalence of HPV was 5.4%, (95%CI 4.4-6.6, 96/1784). The incidence of HPV in the 827 women, who were HPV negative in their first test, was 2.4% (95%CI 1.5-3.8, n = 20). At the repeat test 1.2% remained positive (95%CI 0.6-2.3, n = 10). HPV-related dysplasia diagnosed by histology was found in 1.2% (95%CI 0.6-2.3, n = 10) of the 827 women. CIN2+ was found in 0.5% (95%CI 0.2-1.3, n = 4). In the repeat HPV test 52.6% 10/19) were HPV positive. The time between an HPV negative test and an HPV positive test and CIN2+ was on average 45.5 months (range 10-85 months). The positive predictive value (PPV) for CIN2+ was 20.0% in the first positive HPV test and 40.0% in the repeat HPV test. The women with CIN2+ had normal cytology. No cancer or glandular dysplasia was detected.INTERPRETATION: In this study older HPV-negative women were at risk of becoming HPV positive. Among the women who were HPV positive in a repeat test, there was a high risk of dysplasia.
|
|
