| 1. |
- Schramm, W., et al.
(författare)
-
Haemophilia Care in Europe: the ESCHQoL study
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 18:5, s. 729-737
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to determine the clinical conditions of patients with haemophilia within Europe as recommended by the European Commission. In this multicentre, cross-sectional, ambispective study, conducted within 21 European countries patients' clinical data were collected, amongst others haemophilia type, severity, treatment pattern, use of factor products, bleeding, orthopaedic joint scores and infections. A total of 1400 patients, 84.3% with haemophilia A and 15.7% with haemophilia B were enrolled by 42 centres between 2004 and 2006. Thereof, 417 were children (30.0%) and 983 were adults (70.0%). About 70% of patients had severe factor deficiency (<1%). More than half of the adults were carriers of chronic infections (12.6% HIV, 55.8% HCV), compared to only 3.8% children (no HIV, 2.9% HCV). Patients were grouped according to per capita amount of clotting factor used in patients' region of residence in 2005: region 1: >5 IU; region 2: 25 IU; region 3: <2 IU. Paediatric and adult patients in region 3 had median numbers of three and eight joint bleeds, respectively, with worse joint scores compared to region 1 with zero and one bleed. Prophylactic therapy was used in only 31.3% children and 8.9% adults with severe haemophilia in region 3 compared to 93.7% and 54.1%, respectively, in region 1. Statistical analysis revealed that residence in areas with low factor consumption/availability is the most prominent risk factor for joint disease. Access of European patients with haemophilia to optimal care with safe factor VIII concentrates is limited and depends on the region of residence.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ljung, L., et al.
(författare)
-
Good response on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors is associated with a decreased risk of acute coronary syndrome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. - : Informa Healthcare. - 0300-9742 .- 1502-7732. ; 43:Suppl. 127 Meeting Abstract OP11/PP156, s. 8-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Inflammatory activity, as well as traditional cardiovascular risk factors, is thought to underlie the increased risk of coronary disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We therefore wanted to evaluate whether the level of response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in RA are associated with the risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Method: All patients with RA and no previous ischaemic heart disease who started treatment with a first TNFi during 2001–2010 as registered in the Swedish Biologics Register were identified. Of the patients (n ¼ 6615) at risk for exposure (i.e. EULAR response at 5 3 months), response data was available for 75% (n¼ 4938). For each patient, five matched referents were selected randomly from the Population Register. Follow-up was maximized to 1 and 2 years, respectively. The outcome, incident ACS, was defined as a primary discharge diagnosis of myocardial infarction or unstable angina, or myocardial infarction as the underlying cause of death. Incidence rates were calculated and adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models were used for risk estimations.Results: During the first year of follow-up, 33 cases of ACS occurred among the patients. The risk (hazard ratio, HR) of ACS for good responders compared with none responders, fully adjusted, was 0.26 (95% CI 0.08–0.83), and for moderate responders compared with no responders 0.81 (95% CI 0.36–1.79). Compared with the general population no increase in the risk of ACS was observed among good responders (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.27–2.06). The lower risk of ACS among good responders was also noted during 2 years of follow-up.Conclusions: Good EULAR response after 5 months of treatment with TNFi in RA patients was associated with a significantly decreased risk of ACS. In patients with good response on therapy, no significant increase in the risk of ACS was detectable in comparison with the risk in the general population during the 2 years after the evaluation.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Lundin, Björn, et al.
(författare)
-
An MRI scale for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy from the International Prophylaxis Study Group.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 18:6, s. 962-970
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Evaluation of prophylactic treatment of haemophilia requires sensitive methods. To design and test a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scale for haemophilic arthropathy, two scales of a combined MRI scoring scheme were merged into a single scale which includes soft tissue and osteochondral subscores. Sixty-one joint MRI's of 46 patients with haemophilia were evaluated by four radiologists using the new and older scales. Forty-six of the joints were evaluated using two X-ray scales. For all MRI scores, interreader agreement and correlations with X-ray scores and lifetime number of haemarthroses were analysed. The interreader agreement intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.82, 0.89 and 0.88 for the soft tissue and osteochondral subscores and the total score, as evaluated according to the new MRI scale, compared to 0.80 and 0.89 as for the older scales. The total score and osteochondral subscore according to the new scale, as well as scores according to the older scales were correlated (P < 0.01) with number of haemarthroses (Spearman correlation 0.35-0.68) and with the X-ray scores (Spearman correlation 0.40-0.76), but no correlation (P > 0.05) was found between the soft tissue subscore of the new MRI scale and the X-ray scores. The new MRI scale is simpler to apply than the older and has similar reader reliability and correlation with lifetime number of haemarthroses, and by separating soft tissue and osteochondral changes it gives additional information. The new scale is useful for analyses of early and moderate stages of arthropathy, and may help to evaluate prophylactic haemophilia treatment.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
