| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Wijns, W, et al.
(författare)
-
Myocardial revascularization
- 2011
-
Ingår i: REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA. - : Elsevier BV. - 0870-2551 .- 2174-2049. ; 30:12, s. 951-1005
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Borer, J. S., et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: the SHIFT Study
- 2012
-
Ingår i: European heart journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1522-9645 .- 0195-668X. ; 33:22, s. 2813-2820
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AimsWe explored the effect of treatment with ivabradine, a pure heart rate-slowing agent, on recurrent hospitalizations for worsening heart failure (HF) in the SHIFT trial.Methods and resultsSHIFT was a double-blind clinical trial in which 6505 patients with moderate-to-severe HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, all of whom had been hospitalized for HF during the preceding year, were randomized to ivabradine or to placebo on a background of guideline-recommended HF therapy (including maximized beta-blockade). In total, 1186 patients experienced at least one additional HF hospitalization during the study, 472 suffered at least two, and 218 suffered at least 3. Patients with additional HF hospitalizations had more severe disease than those without. Ivabradine was associated with fewer total HF hospitalizations [902 vs. 1211 events with placebo; incidence rate ratio, 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65-0.87, P = 0.0002] during the 22.9-month median follow-up. Ivabradine-treated patients evidenced lower risk for a second or third additional HF hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR): 0.66, 95% CI, 0.55-0.79, P < 0.001 and HR: 0.71, 95% CI, 0.54-0.93, P = 0.012, respectively]. Similar observations were made for all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalizations.ConclusionTreatment with ivabradine, on a background of guidelines-based HF therapy, is associated with a substantial reduction in the likelihood of recurrent hospitalizations for worsening HF. This benefit can be expected to improve the quality of life and to substantially reduce health-care costs.
|
|
| 8. |
- Delgado-Ortega, L., et al.
(författare)
-
PCV45 Health Economic Evaluation of Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Patients (ACS) Based on the Plato Study from A Spanish Health Care Perspective
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Value in Health. - : Elsevier. - 1098-3015 .- 1524-4733. ; 14:7, s. A372-A372
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- ObjectivesPLATO was a multi centered, double blind, randomized study that included 18,624 ACS patients from 43 countries, comparing ticagrelor + aspirin versus clopidogrel + aspirin. The PLATO demonstrated that ticagrelor was superior on the primary composite endpoint: myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.92) without an increase in major bleedings compared to clopidogrel, and whether the strategy of choice was invasive or conservative. The aim of this analysis is to estimate direct health care costs from a Spanish health care perspective (excluding drug costs because ticagrelor price has not yet been established).MethodsResource utilization was pre specified in the PLATO trial and included hospitalization bed days, investigations, interventions and blood products. Direct health care costs per patient at 12 months were estimated by multiplying the resource use with Spanish unit costs derived from the Spanish database e-salud, the GRDs of the Ministry of Health, published literature, and the CMBD 2008.ResultsTicagrelor resulted in numerically fewer bed days (mean difference per patient 0.21, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.59), PCIs (mean difference per patient 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03) and CABGs (mean difference per patient 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.01). Ticagrelor is associated with €341 reduction per patient (95% CI: 31 to 652) in healthcare costs at 12 months compared to clopidogrel. The reduction in healthcare costs was mainly due to fewer hospital days and cardiovascular interventions in the ticagrelor group. The reduction in cost increased over the 12-month treatment period consistent with the rate of clinical events over time in the PLATO study.ConclusionsTreatment with ticagrelor is associated with cost savings in patients with ACS at 12 months compared with clopidogrel (excluding drug costs) from a Spanish health care perspective. However, the total cost savings will depend on drug price, data not available yet.
|
|
| 9. |
- Kolh, P, et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1873-734X .- 1010-7940. ; 3838 Suppl, s. S1-S52
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
